New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

HIST 308 Notes Feb.7-Feb.11,2016

by: Audra Oul

HIST 308 Notes Feb.7-Feb.11,2016 HIST 308

Marketplace > California State University Long Beach > History > HIST 308 > HIST 308 Notes Feb 7 Feb 11 2016
Audra Oul
Long Beach State

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

Death penalty Furman v. Georgia Jones v. Chaparral Early Method Joseph Wood
Law and Civilization
Martha Kadue
Law and Civilization
75 ?




Popular in Law and Civilization

Popular in History

This 5 page Bundle was uploaded by Audra Oul on Tuesday March 15, 2016. The Bundle belongs to HIST 308 at California State University Long Beach taught by Martha Kadue in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 31 views. For similar materials see Law and Civilization in History at California State University Long Beach.

Similar to HIST 308 at Long Beach State


Reviews for HIST 308 Notes Feb.7-Feb.11,2016


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 03/15/16
Monday, March 7, 2016 Death Penalty Eight Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment Today-is it unusual? (“who is sentenced to death” Wednesday is it cruel? (how is death penalty administered? 1791- Cruel and unusual punishment adopted early in America Government can impose cruel and unusual punishment Selected out for punishment Selected idea of capricious and arbitrary Capricious: sudden change of mood Arbitrary: based on personal whim and not reason Capricious-king inflects them Faith government imposes punishment unfairly. Not subject to arbitrary Furman v. Georgia 3 African American=defendant 2 rape white women 1 killed a man Got the death penalty, poorly educated Mentally disabled Love education Borderline personality State punish white people did not get the death penalty A particular jury is a problem Gave unlimited discretion to judges Furman v. Georgia: What does Justice Douglas assume about society’s view of poor and/or minority defendants? Crime to be poor? Crime to be non-white 1970s assumptions of poor not working more likely criminal Not good ethics or standards Stereotypes can cause someone their life Every stage had death penalty have statue involved States pass laws that created personal circumstances California Death Penalty Statue: What Societal Concerns are reflected in the special circumstances? What makes the death penalty appropriate the crime with special circumstances? California Death penalty disagree a lot spend on death penalty A lot of California not executed. Do not think it is appropriate 4 planted devices hidden Wrong place at the wrong time Randomness upsets the society Killing because part of jury system Plant bomb and guide system Do not want judge to be intimidated Have a much larger effect on society their job 21. A murder is the same as responsibility as someone planning Justice hope of redemption or rehabilitation in terms of murder Person in prison for life for killing somebody Death penalty crimes to be most horrendous, serious More research to build defense Impossible to equalize the situation If jury did not know the bank status Life or death? Victims was stabbed over crimes, had throat slit, gunshot wounded to heal 3-4 years old white female with no prior criminal history admitted killing but claimed self-defense against abusive boyfriend Life or death? Prosecutor claimed she killed in jealous rage when he tried to end relationship Contested psychiatric testimony regarding defendant PISD, anxiety from trauma (earlier by family) borderline personality (immaturity, unstable sense of identify) She was convicted of 1 degree murder Death penalty requires finding murder was “cruel, horrendous, or depraved” Sentence: Death or life without parole? Psychiatric situation: a mitigating factor Found mitigating factor she violent outburst Bias much more likely to cut slack for women than a man A lot of assumptions to look at applying assumptions Jones v. Chaparral Similar to an argument similar to Furman Time to limit execution It is an issue More likely to die in prison Ordered executed nor order in sentence to death It is random Sentence to death may be executed or not Arbitrary in nature The state can speed up the process States unwilling to fund the process Wednesday, March 9, 2016 Monday made a death penalty decision on a brief of an argument Long process of appeal-collateral appeals Two justices case brief argued Prosecution withheld evidence Knew of evidence that was beneficial Required to disclose it Death penalty is an inevitable penalty Early Method Method 1 and Method 2 Newer method is civilized Quartered-barbaric Guillotine-King of England Severe the neck separate the head from the bottom Used in France until 1997 France outlaw death penalty in 1981 Early Method Firing squad Civilized Cruel- meant to be pain Approved to be crueler Electric chair New York=Electric chair Developed in the 19 century Gas Chamber Direct current Standard of electricity Execution=deter the effect Crown identity with more people executed 1936 Blackmun was hanged Some 20, 000 people were seen around Not deemed appropriate display of state power Move to execution Today lethal injection Method infer scientific put day to sleep painless Seems to be scientific, less painful, and less barbaric Issue #1 availability of drugs One put proponents on the company Saved from execution Morphine not the one that causes the death Difficult for states to get drug curtail One stops the heart and the other the diaphragm Third one paralytic Lethal injection available to drugs Personal Some had to adjust dosage Health professional not something oath will do Get possible of best skilled Dragged over an hour Death penalty constitutional invited a way to be constitutional Courts deal with everything eventually had compelling evidence Good way of killing someone That is painful or too painful Glossip v. Gross: likely making accepting less accompanying for society? Society wants human Judge Zworski interesting idea of death penalty Fire squad is more efficient Have to acknowledge what they are doing 1976- Revisited statute and court upheld is constitutionality Look at death penalty Use this drug Arbitrary of the imposition =diminish psychological effect # of people on death row bound to be considered for death penalty Drugs are going to happen Do not want people of no form of rehabilitation Did nothing to prosecute witness Process people less reliable Place for criminal system for death penalty why don’t use fire squad Ways of making less personal Harder to both; harder to watch Dehumanizing the person when executed Joseph wood: Arizona, July 214 Received 15 times the amount of drugs in the state’s protocol over almost 2 hour period State Claimed wood was Wood was not in pain; observers said he gulped and gasped Wood’s attorneys had begun effort to obtain court order to stop the execution (by phone, but Wood died before Judge could rule) If unconscious, that should not being doing it… Clayton Lockett: Oklahoma, April 2014 Took an hour to successfully insert IV 1 drug Sedate (to block pain of next drugs) nd 2rd drug: paralyzes respiratory system 3 drug: stops heart Medieval personnel said he was not conscious And Lockett said, “I’m not” Observers screened continue not to move arms and legs, mumbled Died of heart attack


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

75 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Anthony Lee UC Santa Barbara

"I bought an awesome study guide, which helped me get an A in my Math 34B class this quarter!"

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.