New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Professional Ethics, Week 3 Notes Part 1

by: Chloe Luyet

Professional Ethics, Week 3 Notes Part 1 PHI 1120, Professional Ethics

Marketplace > Wayne State University > PHIL-Philosophy > PHI 1120, Professional Ethics > Professional Ethics Week 3 Notes Part 1
Chloe Luyet

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

This is part 1 notes for this week (week 3). I decided to upload day one of week three lecture notes early because Dr. Fanselow hinted in lecture that the concepts covered in lecture today (the on...
Professional Ethics
Dr. Ryan Fanselow
Study Guide
50 ?




Popular in Professional Ethics

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy

This 4 page Study Guide was uploaded by Chloe Luyet on Tuesday January 26, 2016. The Study Guide belongs to PHI 1120, Professional Ethics at Wayne State University taught by Dr. Ryan Fanselow in Winter 2016. Since its upload, it has received 118 views. For similar materials see Professional Ethics in PHIL-Philosophy at Wayne State University.

Similar to PHI 1120, Professional Ethics at WSU

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy


Reviews for Professional Ethics, Week 3 Notes Part 1


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 01/26/16
Learning Objectives 1. Gain a better understanding of professional-client relationship 2. Be able to describe and apply the 5 models of the professional- client relationship a. We want models that do three things: i. explains an obscure relationship (illuminating), using relationships that are already familiar to us (i.e. friendships and family) ii. we can use to determine if any given relationship between professional and client is healthy iii. and is plausible (the relationship model should make sense from what we already know about the professional-client relationship) I. MODELS 1. Agency Model  professional is an expert acting at the direction of the client  client sets the ends and the professional’s job is to find the means (separation of labor)  professionals don’t decide what goals to pursue, but do what the clients tell them  professionals are the “Mouthpieces” and/or “Hired guns” a. Mouthpiece: speaks on your behalf b. Hired gun: does what is asked, no questions  professional doesn’t worry about the “end”/whether it’s moral or not  professional looks out for clients needs/wants (the professional is the client’s advocate)  PROS  keeps the relationship very professional/business-oriented  non-confrontational model – every party knows their position in the relationship  CONS  professional has more knowledge and may know what’s better a. EX/ you want to lose weight, but the doctor doesn’t think that’s a good idea for body-weight statistical reasons/evidence.  too narrow of a model…the professional is an expert not only on how to get what the client wants, but also is the expert on whether or not to even do it  strong role-differentiated behavior  awkward model for accountants (they just read the numbers even if a client doesn’t want to find fraud) 2. Contract Model  2 free and informed persons (professional and client) make an agreement (or contract)  both parties aren’t forced and they know the deal  professional and client’s job is to carry out the terms of the agreement  PROS  no surprises – both parties know their responsibilities toward each other in the relationship  CONS  not a very flexible system b/c one might want to change the contract  worry exists about the extent to which “free” and “informed” applies to the client’s side of the relationship a. professional knows much more than the client (informed) b. client has more to lose oftentimes than the professional (free) i. EX/ professional might just lose some money/regular business, but the client’s life could be on the line (emergency room)  contract model doesn’t account well for the superiority of the professional (the higher intelligence factor) 3. Friendship Model  professional and client are friends, as the name implies  they’re involved in a partnership characterized by trust and mutual cooperation  they take each other’s interests more seriously than the interests of strangers  PROS  not a negotiation, like contract model (not adversarial)  more flexible (unlike contract model)  CONS  friends are usually equals, but professional has superior knowledge  friendship leads to expectations and professionals should keep clients at some distance personally  professionals can be engaged in interests of their clients, but not ALL interests (only interested in the interests of the client that apply to the service provided)  professional is getting paid (not a in the relationship as a friend/not for “love”)  professionals could go along with something unethical if the relationship was friendship based (look to the “Inner Ring” – belonging to something often makes people act wrongly/unethically) 4. Parent Model  professional is like a parent (parent has superior knowledge and experience in relation to a child)  thus, professionals take responsibility and authority in decision-making  CONS  client’s freedom is take away  client’s autonomy is jeopardized a. autonomy has two factors: i. we have the capacity to make decisions for ourselves ii. we should respect each person’s autonomy  relies solely on trust  gives the professional the opportunity to take advantage of the child/client BUT this particular model (keep in mind) assumes that the professional is acting in what he/she thinks is in the best interests of the client  what the professional THINKS is best for the client is just his/her opinion a. EX/ say a client is told he/she can live a long life w/ some neuro procedure, but it’ll cost his/her left arm. the only thing this person wants is to be a gr8 golfer; therefore, to the client, it’d be better to live a shorter life playing golf than a long one without playing 5. Fiduciary Model  takes the advantages of all of them and puts it together  HOW IT WORKS: a. professional figures out what to do and suggests course of action to client b. professional gives the client the necessary information to make an informed decision c. ultimately, it is the client that has the final say (giving consent or refusing)  professional decides; client consents  division of labor again  respects autonomy of client  difference b/w fiduciary and client model: clients have a “veto-power” of sorts to the professional’s decisions  CONS  cases when the client is incapable of making a decision (i.e. mentally incompetent clients require the use of the parent model)  guardians are the exception


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

50 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Allison Fischer University of Alabama

"I signed up to be an Elite Notetaker with 2 of my sorority sisters this semester. We just posted our notes weekly and were each making over $600 per month. I LOVE StudySoup!"

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.