Description
Self-Testing Questions
In order to test your understanding of the concepts you are supposed to have learned, ask yourself the following questions and answer them (either in writing or just in your mind) without looking at the book:
1. Why do we need an argument when there is an issue? 2. What are the two main parts of an argument?
3. What is the purpose of offering an argument?
4. Can you persuade someone without offering an argument? Why?
5. What is the difference between a claim that is objective and a claim that is subjective? (Give some examples.)
6. What are cognitive biases? (Give some examples.)
* If you don't know how to answer any of the above questions, you should reread the relevant section(s).
Exercises
Do the following exercises (answers have been posted in this learning module):
Exercise 1-1
Exercise 1-3
Exercise 1-4
Exercise 1-5
Exercise 1-6
Exercise 1-12
Exercise 1-14
Exercise 1-1
▲1. An argument consists of two parts, one of which is intended to provide a reason for accepting the other part.
2. True
3. False
▲4. False
5. True
6. True
▲7. True
8. False
9. True
▲10. False. As an example of an opinion that isn't subjective, we (the authors) are of the opinion there is life somewhere else in the universe. If there is life, our opinion is true. If there isn't, then it is false. We don't know whether our opinion is true or false, but we do know that it is one or the other, and we know that whether it is true or false is independent of whether we think there is life somewhere else in the universe.
We also discuss several other topics like What is an absolute space?
11. False
12. Moral subjectivism
▲13. C. The first order of business is to determine what the issue is.
14. True
15. False
▲16. True
17. True
18. False
▲19. D
20. False
Exercise 1-3
▲1. Not objective
2. Objective Don't forget about the age old question of What do conceptual scheme relativists believe?
3. Objective
▲4. Not objective
5. Objective
6. Objective
▲7. Not objective
8. Not objective
9. Objective
▲10. Objective
11. Not objective
12. Objective
Exercise 1-4
▲1. Subjective
2. Not subjective
3. Not subjective
▲4. Subjective.
5. Not subjective
6. Subjective
▲7. Not subjective
8. Subjective
9. Subjective
▲10. Not subjective, unless the speaker intends to imply that Kerry's chin is unattractive, in which case the assertion would be subjective. If the speaker is taking a position on whether Kerry’s chin is quite unusual, the claim also would be subjective, even if he or she did not mean to imply that it is an unattractive chin.
Exercise 1-5
▲1. Argument
2. Not an argument
3. Not an argument
▲4. Not an argument
5. Not an argument
6. Argument
▲7. Not an argument
8. Argument
9. Argument
▲10. Argument We also discuss several other topics like What are the types of a pitch?
Exercise 1-6
▲1. No argument
2. The conclusion is that we will have to find someone else who owns a truck. 3. The conclusion is that bans on firearms are unproductive.
▲4. The conclusion is that computers will never be able to converse intelligently through speech.
5. The conclusion is that The Carrie Diaries isn’t very good.
6. No argument
▲7. The conclusion is that chemicals in teething rings and soft plastic toys may cause cancer. 8. The conclusion is that as long as the number of lethal weapons in the hands of the American people continues to grow, so will the murder rate. Don't forget about the age old question of How is ageism a form of discrimination and prejudice that has negative impacts on all members of society?
Don't forget about the age old question of Why was china not interested in importing anything else?
9. The conclusion is that times have changed.
10. No argument
Exercise 1-12
▲1. a
2. c
3. b
▲4. b
5. a We also discuss several other topics like Where did romulus set up a sanctuary for criminals?
6. b
▲7. e. The issue is whether it is surprising that the winner of this year's spelling bee is a straight A student whose favorite subject is science.
8. b
9. c
▲10. c. But notice YOUR FRIEND hasn't given a reason for thinking the governor has been good.
Exercise 1-14
▲1. MRS. is addressing both issues raised by MR.
2. MOORE raises the issue of whether the administration’s latest Afghanistan proposal will make matters worse. PARKER says nothing about that issue.
3. SHE has raised the issue of whether HE gives her enough help around the house, as well as the issue of whether HE ever does anything. HE responds to the second issue explicitly and by implication to the first issue. SHE responds by raising the question of who does the most.
▲4. CAUTIOUS is addressing the issue raised by HEEDLESS, of whether people should complain about what we are doing in Afghanistan.
5. MR. RJ raises the issue of whether more casinos are needed around here. MR. JR says nothing about that issue.
6. JOE FITNESS raises the issue of whether he should fix the chain on his bike. COUCH POTATO responds to that issue.
▲7. OLD GUY is addressing YOUNG GUY’S issue of whether baseball players are better now than forty years ago. He does not support his position with an argument, however.
8. STUDENT ONE raises the issue of whether studying is a waste of time. STUDENT TWO does not respond to that issue.
9. PATRIOT does not take issue with PHILATELIST’S statement that U.S. postage stamps are now being printed in Canada. He or she instead raises the question of whether that is a good thing.
▲10. SECOND NEIGHBOR is addressing the issue raised by FIRST NEIGHBOR, which is whether SECOND NEIGHBOR has a right to make so much noise at night. SECOND NEIGHBOR thinks he has the right.
11. STUDY PARTNER TWO doesn’t take issue with whether they should get a pizza. Instead, he or she raises the question of whether to get an anchovy pizza.
12. FEMALE STUDENT raises the question of whether the Internet is overrated. MALE STUDENT doesn’t address that issue.
▲13. DEVON is not addressing RAMON’S issue, which is whether this English course is a complete waste of time.
14. CULTURALLY CHALLENGED PERSON’S SPOUSE has asked CULTURALLY CHALLENGED PERSON to go to a concert, he has declined, and she is trying to force him. They are both addressing the same issue.
15. REPUBLICAN has raised the issue of whether Obama’s budget requests makes sense. DEMOCRAT does not address that issue.
▲16. PARKER isn’t addressing Moore’s issue, which is whether Thomas Brothers or Vernon Construction does better work. Instead, he addresses whether Thomas Brothers charges too much.
17. URBANITE raises the issue of whether the new requirements are a good thing environmentally. SUBURBANITE does not address that issue.
18. CRITIC has questioned the morally propriety of selling junk bonds without emphasizing the risks. ENTREPRENEUR responds to that issue.
▲19. On the surface, it may seem that both hands address the issue of whether a person such as ONE HAND can feel safe in her own home. But ONE HAND’S real issue is whether the large number of handguns makes one unsafe in one’s own home. OTHER HAND ignores this issue completely.
20. ONE GUY has raised the issue of whether DVD recorders are overpriced. ANOTHER does not address that issue.
21.FED UP has raised the issue of whether to exercise an early retirement option and move to his place in Arkansas. FRIEND addresses this issue.
▲22. JENNIFER does not address the issue raised by KATIE, which is whether she (JENNIFER) would be better off riding a bike to school. JENNIFER in effect changes the subject. Instead of addressing whether she would be better off riding a bike to school, JENNIFER starts talking about KATIE, as if KATIE’S behavior somehow invalidates what KATIE has asserted. This is like item 5, in which MR. JR changes the subject in a similar way.
23. DEZRA raised the issue of whether KEN should mow the lawn in his bare feet. KEN does not respond to this issue.
24. YAO raised the issue of whether the fact iMacs never get viruses isn’t a nice feature of the computer. MAO doesn’t respond to that issue.
▲25. HERR UBERALLES thinks they spend more than they should on heating. FRAU UBERALLES reminds him that she gets cold easily, which she thinks justifies the heating expense. She addresses the issue raised by him.
Chapter 1 What Is Critical Thinking, Anyway?
This chapter introduces some very basic concepts in critical thinking, such as cognitive biases, the concept of an argument, the distinction between objective claims and subjective claims, and the relation between truth and knowledge. Read the whole chapter once and then reread the following sections:
Objective Claims and Subjective Claims (p.4)
Arguments (pp.7-8)
Cognitive biases (pp.14-19)
What You Are Supposed to Have Learned After reading this chapter, you should understand:
1. Why we need critical thinking.
2. The difference between a sentence that is a claim and a sentence that is not a claim.
3. The difference between an objective claim and a subjective claim.
4. The purpose of an argument.
5. The basic structure of an argument.
6. What cognitive biases are.
7. The difficulty of getting rid of cognitive biases.
The Basics!
Chapter 1: First of Three Parts
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
1
When you try to support or prove a claim, you give a what? • An argument
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
2
The part of an argument you try to support is called the what? • The conclusion
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
3
The part that does the
supporting is?
• The premise (or premises)
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
4
An argument can have how many conclusions?
A. One only
B. More than one
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
5
How many premises can an argument have?
A. One only
B. More than one
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
6
“Carl would like to help out, but he won't be in town. So we'll have to find someone else who owns a truck.”
Is this an argument?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
7
“Carl would like to help out, but he won't be in town. So we'll have to find someone else who owns a truck.”
What’s the conclusion?
A. First sentence
B. Second sentence
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
8
“The Directory of Intentional Communities lists more than two hundred groups across the country organized around a wide variety of purposes, including environmentally aware living.”
Argument?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
9
“Fears that chemicals in teething rings and soft plastic toys may cause cancer may be justified. Last week, the Consumer Product
Safety Commission issued a report confirming that low amounts of DEHP, known to cause liver cancer in lab animals, may be absorbed from certain infant products.”
Argument?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
10
“Can it be established that genetic humanity is sufficient for moral humanity? I think there are very good reasons for not defining the moral community in this way.”
Argument?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
11
“Was Bush a good president? Heck yeah! He was great! If you don’t know that, your parents must be brother and sister.”
Argument?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
12
“Computers will never be able to converse intelligently through speech. A simple example proves this is so. The sentences ‘How do you recognize speech?’ and ‘How do you wreck a nice beach?’ have entirely different meanings, but they sound similar enough that a computer could not distinguish the two.”
Argument?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
13
“Computers will never be able to converse intelligently through speech. A simple example proves this is so. The sentences ‘How do you recognize speech?’ and ‘How do you wreck a nice beach?’ have entirely different meanings, but they sound similar enough that a computer could not distinguish the two.”
What is the conclusion of this argument? A. The first sentence
B. The second sentence
C. The third sentence
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
14
“Will hot water freeze faster than cold water? A lot of people have that idea, but they are wrong. Cold water freezes faster than hot water.”
What sentence contains the conclusion? A. The first sentence
B. The second sentence
C. The third sentence
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
15
?
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 16
Ha! It isn’t an argument!
“Will hot water freeze faster than cold water? A lot of people have that idea, but they are wrong. Cold water freezes faster than hot water.”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
17
“Who do I think will win American Idol next time? Not Fred Thompson.”
What sentence contains the conclusion? A. The first sentence
B. The second sentence
C. This isn’t an argument.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
18
"Some theorists believe it is appropriate to prevent people who enter politics from using their office to make financial gains. Others feel it may be shortsighted to create situations that violate the essence of political representation. Neither point of view is correct."
What sentence contains the conclusion? A. The first sentence
B. The second sentence
C. The third sentence
D. This isn’t an argument.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
19
"The victims' blood was on the glove they found behind Simpson's house. That means Simpson committed the murders.”
Which of these statements implies that the PREMISE is false?
1. “Maybe someone planted the glove behind his house.”
2. “So what? They didn’t link the glove to Simpson.”
3. “It was the same blood type, but it wasn’t their blood.”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
20
“The lawn was reseeded this fall.
Therefore, we won’t track mud into the house in the spring.”
Which of these statements implies that the PREMISE is false?
a. Maybe the new seed won’t germinate. b. Maybe the seed will germinate but will die out before spring.
c. Both of the above
d. None of the above
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
21
New Topic.
What is an ISSUE?????? Issue: a question that’s been raised
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
22
Can a single person raise an issue?
•Yes
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
23
“I know why I shouldn’t take that math course. First, it's too hard, and I’ll probably flunk it. Second, I’m going to spend the whole term in a state of frustration. Third, I’ll probably get depressed and do poorly in all the rest of his courses.”
The issue?
A. Whether I should take the math course B. Whether I would flunk the math course C. Whether I will spend the whole term in a state of frustration
D. Whether I will get depressed and do poorly in all the rest of his courses
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
24
“The defeat of the school voucher initiative was a bad thing for the country because now there won't be any incentive for public schools to clean up their act. Furthermore, the defeat perpetuates the private-school for-the-rich, public-school-for-the-poor syndrome.”
What is the issue?
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
25
The issue is…
A. Whether there is now any incentive for public schools to clean up their act B. Whether the defeat of the school voucher initiative was bad for the country C. Two issues are equally stressed in the passage; whether there is now any incentive for public schools to clean up their acts, AND whether the private school-for-the-rich, public-school-for-the poor syndrome will be perpetuated.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
26
“The party image of Choo-Choo State is not exaggerated. Surveys indicate a majority of Choo-Choo State students spend more time ‘socializing’ than preparing for classes.”
What is the issue?
A. Whether the surveys are accurate B. Whether the surveys show the party image is exaggerated
C. Whether the party image is
exaggerated
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
27
“The party image of Choo-Choo State is not exaggerated. Surveys indicate a majority of Choo-Choo State students say they spend more time ‘socializing’ than preparing for classes.”
What is the speaker’s POSITION on the issue?
A. The party image of Choo-Choo State is exaggerated.
B. The party image of Choo-Choo State is not exaggerated.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
28
“The party image of Choo-Choo State is not exaggerated. Surveys indicate a majority of Choo-Choo State students say they spend more time ‘socializing’ than preparing for classes.”
Repeat: the ISSUE is…
• WHETHER the party image of Choo-Choo State is exaggerated. The speaker’s POSITION is…
• THAT the party image of Choo Choo State is NOT exaggerated.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
29
“California’s telecom providers got a nice break from Schwarzenegger. He waived their fees for installing fiber optic conduit along state-owned rights of way.”
What is the issue?
A. Whether Calif’s telecom providers got a nice break from Schwarzenegger
B. Whether Schwarzenegger waived the providers’ fees
C. Whether Schwarzenegger did the
right thing by waiving the providers’ fees D. That Calif’s telecom providers got a nice break from Schwarzenegger
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
30
PENELOPE: I think toilet paper looks better if it unwinds from the back side of the spool.
PENNY: Not me. I think it looks better the other way.
Is Penny addressing the issue raised by Penelope?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
31
Review
• Argument
• Premise vs. Conclusion
• Issue vs. position on an issue
• Conclusion is a person’s position on an issue
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
32
PARKER: Bush’s latest Iraq proposal is going to make matters worse.
MOORE: You’re just saying that because you’re a Democrat.
Is Moore addressing the issue raised by Parker?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
33
R.J: As far as I am concerned, there are too many casinos around already. They should stop building new ones.
R.J.’s GIRL FRIEND: Yeah? Well, that’s a strange idea coming from someone who plays the lottery all the time.
Is R.J.’s girl friend addressing the issue raised by R.J.?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
34
KATIE: Hey, Jennifer. I hate to say this, but if you picked up your stuff once in a while this place would look a lot better.
JENNIFER: Hey, you leave things laying around too. You and your stupid boy friend.
Is Jennifer addressing the issue raised by Katie?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
35
DEZRA: What are you doing riding a motorcycle without a helmet? That’s totally unsafe.
DENNIS: C’mon. I’ve seen you driving around without a seat belt.
Is DENNIS addressing the issue raised by DEZRA?
A. Yes
B. No
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
36
LEE: Nice thing about Macs…they don’t get viruses.
HAM: Of course you would say that. You own one.
Is HAM addressing the issue raised by LEE?
A. Yes
B. No
37
HAM doesn’t address the issue of
whether Macs get viruses.
Instead, he addresses the issue of
LEE’s motivation for praising
Macs.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
Want to see the second part?
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
38
Yeah! Bring ‘er on!
S
I
B
R
O
C
/
e
e
r
F
-
y
t
l
a
y
o
R
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 39
The Basics (continued) Chapter 1: Second of Three Parts
Divide the following statements into two groups
1. Does God exist? Yes! I was brought up as a Christian!
2. Turtles can walk backwards! I’ve seen ‘em! 3. Does God exist? Yes! Something created the universe!
4. Turtles can walk backwards when they feel like it.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
2
Two items are arguments.
1. Does God exist? Yes! Something created the universe!
2. Turtles can walk backwards! I’ve seen ‘em! 3. Does God exist? Yes! I was brought up as a Christian! [no argument]
4. Turtles can walk backwards when they feel like it. [no argument]
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
3
Which are arguments?
1. I got sick because I didn’t get enough rest over the weekend.
2. The governor should resign because everyone has lost faith in his leadership ability.
3. Pine trees are called “evergreens” because they don’t lose their leaves.
4. You are making a mistake wearing that outfit because it looks tacky.
5. Jennifer doesn’t wear outfits like that because she thinks they look tacky.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
4
Only two arguments!
1. I got sick because I didn’t get enough rest over the weekend.
2. The governor should resign because everyone has lost faith in his leadership ability.
3. Pine trees are called “evergreens” because they don’t lose their leaves.
4. You are making a mistake wearing that outfit because it looks tacky.
5. Jennifer doesn’t wear outfits like that because she thinks they look tacky.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
5
What’s the difference between the following two statements???
1. “There is a lot of smoke in here because there is a fire out there.”
2. “There is a fire out there because there is a lot of smoke in here.”
Only # 2 is an argument!
A closer look…
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
6
1. “There is a lot of smoke in here because there is a fire out there.” 2. “There is a fire out there because there is a lot of smoke in here.”
Cause! Evidence!
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
7
Write two statements of the form
“X because Y.” Make only one an argument.
Example:
1. She just finished working out because she is sweating.
2. She is sweating because she just finished working out.
Argument! Gives a reason for thinking she just finished working out.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
8
Moral:
“X because Y!” might be an ARGUMENT: ???? She just finished working out because she is sweating.
Might also be CAUSE/EFFECT EXPLANATION: ???? She is sweating because she just finished working out.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
9
NEW DISTINCTION:
Objective vs. Subjective
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
10
DIVIDE INTO TWO GROUPS 1. Rice vinegar tastes better than white vinegar. 2. White vinegar removes lipstick stains; rice vinegar doesn’t.
3. None of the Supreme Court justices is good humored.
4. Nine authors collaborated on that article. 5. Microsoft shares are significantly overpriced.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
11
Three claims are SUBJECTIVE!
1. Rice vinegar tastes better than white vinegar. 2. White vinegar removes lipstick stains; rice vinegar doesn’t.
3. None of the Supreme Court justices is competent.
4. Nine authors collaborated on that article. 5. Microsoft shares are significantly overpriced.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
12
“Subjective judgment”: true if you think it is true
✔ “This class is challenging!”
✔ “Hillary is lots of fun.”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
13
Objective judgment: it’s truth is INDEPENDENT of what you think.
✔ “There are over 300 students in this class.” ✔ “The Dow Jones went up yesterday.” ✔ “There is life on Mars.”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
14
Which of these is subjective?
1. “That is a scary movie.”
2. “That movie scared me.”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
15
Which of these is subjective?
1. “Tastes great!”
2. “Less filling!”
Both!
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
16
Which of these is subjective?
1. “Teach doesn’t care if
you wear a baseball
cap in class.”
2. “It is silly for Teach to
care if you wear a
baseball cap in
class.”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
17
And which of these is
subjective?
1. “These shirts are for sale.”
2. “These shirts are on sale.”
Neither! Both are objective.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
18
Once more: Which is subjective?
1. “God exists.”
2. “God doesn’t exist.”
Neither.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
19
Again:
???? Subjective judgment: its truth depends on what you think; if you think it is true, it’s true for you, and you can’t be mistaken.
???? Objective judgment: its truth depends on objective fact, not on what you think.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
20
Relativism and Objective Claims:
Relativism is the view that if your culture and some other culture have different standards of truth or evidence, there is no independent way by which one culture’s standards can be seen to be more correct than the others’.
???? When a claim is objective its truth depends on objective fact, not on what you or your culture holds to be true.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
21
Last concept:
“Value judgment”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
22
Value Judgment
A value judgment judges the merit or praiseworthiness or desirability of someone or something.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
23
Examples:
???? “The best looking car ever? That would not be the Scion.”
???? “Bush was the best president since the one who came before him.”
???? “It was wrong for you to eat all their cheese.”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
24
More examples:
???? “Professor Stooler is one ugly dude.” ???? “The side-stroke is superior to the crawl.” ???? “You should honor your parents.”
???? “I don’t deserve to be flunked!”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
25
NOT value judgments:
???? “Susan cheated on the final.”
???? “Jennifer’s field goal percentage is higher than Nicole’s.”
???? “The Congressman lied to the grand jury.” ???? “John Kerry has an unusual chin.”
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
26
Unfortunately, there are borderline cases:
???? “Greg is a dedicated father.”
???? “Charles could stand to lose some weight.” ???? “No normal human has a chin like Kerry’s.”
The speaker might well be judging
someone’s or something’s merits with these statements.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
27
For now, we’ll stick to cases most of us will agree on.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
28
Which is a value judgment?
A. That kid looks like his
brother.
B. That kid is better
looking than his
brother.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
29
Which is a value judgment?
A. Secretary Rice is tall
and thin.
B. Secretary Rice is too
tall and thin.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
30
And which of these is a value judgment?
A. Driving solo in the car-pool lane is wrong. B. Driving solo in the car-pool lane is illegal.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
31
Which is a value judgment?
A. This class is too difficult.
B. Teach didn’t calculate my grade accurately.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
32
One more: which of these is a value judgment?
A. These exercises are useful and entertaining. B. Most students think these exercises are useful and entertaining.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
33
ALL these are value judgments. Divide them into two groups:
1. Miller tastes great!
2. You should treat your brother better. 3. That was the best Super Bowl ever. 4. Stealing is wrong.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
34