New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Midterm Study Guide

by: Alexandra Intriago

Midterm Study Guide PHIL109124

Alexandra Intriago

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

This is a study guide for the Midterm on 2/17
Perspectives on Western Culture II
Professor Connors
Study Guide
philosophy, theology, Perspectives
50 ?




Popular in Perspectives on Western Culture II

Popular in Western Culture

This 13 page Study Guide was uploaded by Alexandra Intriago on Sunday February 14, 2016. The Study Guide belongs to PHIL109124 at Boston College taught by Professor Connors in Winter 2016. Since its upload, it has received 53 views. For similar materials see Perspectives on Western Culture II in Western Culture at Boston College.

Similar to PHIL109124 at BC

Popular in Western Culture


Reviews for Midterm Study Guide


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 02/14/16
Midterm Study Guide Theories of Human Nature Theory of Human Form of Government Nature Machiavelli People are naturally self- Autocracy. interested. They are irrational beings who are very similar to animals because they are strong and cunning. He stresses the fact that man must be a “fox and a lion.” Hobbes Humans are naturally in a Monarchy because the state of war because we monarch can protect our all have the same desires, self-interest. We give up so we are going to our wills to the monarch. compete in order to get there. Each individual gives up his or her will to a higher entity. Locke Humans are naturally free Anti-monarchy. He is for a and are born rational government based on the animals. They are able to protection of private choose what they believe, property mixed with labor. so they do not need a monarch in order to pander to their beliefs. Descartes The mind and body are He does not discuss two distinct things. We politics that much, but it derive our existence from can be implied that he was one extended being. Our a progressive in political judgment is the product of views. our understanding and our will. Machiavelli The Prince  Ends justify the means  Letter to Francesco Vettori o Niccolo Machiavelli came from humble origins o Studies, reads o Discussion, well-traveled o Manual labor o Common theme- seeks knowledge o Don’t do anything if it’s inconvenient for you  Kindness=weakness o Luck in favor of you take advantage of this  Fears for his life  Letter to Lorenzo o Knowledge=power o Knowledge for practical use and what helps you now o Seemingly humble compared to the king o Understand the ruler by the ruled and the ruled by the ruler  Principalities o Hereditary vs. New vs. Mixed  Humans only concerned with their own well being  If conquering a land with a different language, go and live there 1) No one will attack 2) Corrupt officials  Kingdom of Darius (Alexander VI took it over and the kingdom was maintained) o Rule by one o Nobility in charge o Direct and present rule  Sultan of Turkey vs. King of France o Focus power in authority o King of France distributed power, and this was a mistake  If the land was under previous rule, do not eradicate them because they will not take up arms. Instead, move there  Virtue over luck because luck is not consistent  Cesare Borgia o How not to rule o Used fortune to his advantage and this ended him  Citizen Ruler- person elected to power from elite or citizenry o Would rather be chosen by elite o Machiavelli says populace could be dangerous because they are more numerous  Strength of ruler is based on the safety and security of the society o Good army and military are other decisive factors of a good ruler Thomas Hobbes: The Leviathan Introduction- Letter to Mr. Francis Godolphin  better to have too much authority than to have too little  Some people may perceive that Hobbes is anti-religious  Nothing will be truly against the Catholic Church  Human Nature o From this, the ideal government should be formed o This is like the Republic  Thinkers have assumptions regarding human nature  Natural state of humans is a state of war  A human being is fundamentally and inherently selfish because we are composed of atoms, which protect themselves. o Matter resists if you try to push into it o We are constantly in a state of war, so we need the government as a baseline security  Body is purely mechanical  Automata- we imitate nature  Call to know thyself o Study all humans study our desires o We must all function similarly o We are all material things and fundamentally the same  Who is human being and what form of government is best for him? o Question Hobbes is trying to answer Part I: of Man Chapter 1: Of Sense  Our body follows a certain structure  Links everything to the material world o Find things in the world through our senses  Matter is the only thing that exists in the world  Hobbes calls the imagination a decaying sense o Appears fainter to you than the way you first experienced it  Dreaming vs. Being Awake o We do not know if we are dreaming or if we are awake Ch. 2: Of Imagination  You do not think of people you think of in waking moments in your dreams  You have no coherent train of thought in your dream  Fundamentally human/material beings  we do not have to question the distinction because it is all just matter and motion  Putting things into words means we are understanding them  Thinking is a matter of adding and subtracting words The Will  Trying to decouple the reason and the will  Agreeing with Machiavelli on the nature of ruling  We voluntarily live in a state of fear o Life is nasty, brutish, and short o Constantly in a state of war  Fear drives us, so being in power is virtually impossible  We form a government based on our fear o Fear of our own life and safety Religion  Prometheus- Greek who stole fire from God o Gods punished humans  Government becomes arbiter of decision-making  We must fear God, so we are obviously driven by fear  Religion is a human construction driven by fear  There is no security in life and we are never not fearing something  Materialistic viewpoint o Matter is the same the only thing that changes is speed and arrangement  Since everyone is equal, we are all going towards the same goal, so there will be inevitable conflict o We are all fundamentally equal, so that naturally leads to war  In terms of the body, we are unequal; in terms of the soul, we are all equal  Justice has no place in a state of war o Agreeing to abide by the covenant and state of Leviathan  Injustice is you disobeying the covenant 1) Right of nature a. The power to preserve your own self interest 2) Law of Nature a. Forbidden to take your own life away (subtraction) 3) Liberty a. Absence of external impediments  Contract of Peace- agree to live by society’s rules o The “covenant”  In a state of nature, you had a right to anything  Inalienable rights o Imprisonment o Self defense o Personal belongings  How covenants are made void o By performing or by being forgiven o Performance is natural end of obligation o Forgiveness, the restitution of liberty  Any rebellion is forgiven must accept and follow the Leviathan Part II- Of Commonwealth  we are constantly at war o In a state of war, we steam up against one another o Must find a way to bring together everyone  Fear the monarch unites every multitude  Each individual gives up own will to an entity that is higher o How could a select group of people know what is best for people’s souls/well beings? o Absolute power corrupts  Hobbes values consodlidation o Everyone has the same passions, so no one would try to take over  State of war as a natural state of humans is insurance for the ruler o Impossible for the ruler to disobey the covenant o You have signed the covenant, so you and the ruler are on part it is impossible for you to disobey the covenant  When the contract is made, it arises from the people o Leviathan does not make any other contract with other people- the covenant is unidirectional o Give up will to one individual or group of individuals  Sovereign in control of education o Right to censorship  Monarchy is when people like the monarch, tyranny is when people do not like the monarch o They are both essentially the same thing  Sovereign and representation are incompatible  Monarchy is the best form of govt. because: 1) interests are the same a. Judge monarch as how well people are doing b. Nature of a ruler 2) Monarch can get better counsel a. Assuming that in a democracy, people are not really smart, they just have money 3) Policies more consistent 4) Civil war is less likely 5) Heir chosen  Voluntary to live in a state of fear  Hobbes says nothing of freedom of will only of ability to choose otherwise  Deterministic  Our will can follow through o We can voluntarily act irrationally o Liberty/necessity made compatible (materialistic value)  Everything is predetermined  Harming ruler would harm yourself o Ruler in charge of security o Making a mockery of agreeing to abide by social contract John Locke- A Letter Concerning Toleration  What is religion’s purpose? o Salvation of souls  What is the commonwealth’s purpose? o Uphold civil interests  A clear source of morality a mix of morality and religion  Allusion to the Old Testament- no moral framework to differentiate from right and wrong  Church with State o Religion inspires fear o People fear government in the same way that they fear God o Advance own end of societal order o Alienates groups of society  Locke alluding to allowing people to choose what they believe  Freedom based on capacity to reason o Value this basic right or you do not  Pg. 25- hypocrisy o Locke accusing charity o Person doing coercing to convert is not being a Christian doing opposite of what Christ did  State has one purpose and Church has another purpose o Degree of separation o Separated interests  State limited as to what it can do as a person o God never gave us authority to rule over other people o One person is not granted power of salvation  Religion- inward soul / State- outward but not directly affect the state of your soul o You cannot be charitable if you have no outward belongings o Locke looking at state through presentation  Inward determination determines salvation  Magistrate can only help external factors o Coercion goes against your conscience – state cannot force you to do this  Define what it means to protect happiness, life, and liberty  Magistrate cannot make you do something against your religion or conscience  Church cannot deny you of civil liberties if you do not adhere by Church laws  Freedom from religious discrimination o One’s conscience  Church cannot take over a state affair  Magistrate cannot impose rules of Church on its citizens 2 ndTreatise of Government: John Locke  Monarchy implied by referral to Adam  Robert Filmer o Used Bible to justify that absolute monarchy is the true form of government sto Adam’s sovereignty  1 Treatise- debunk view that God gave power to Adam  Absolute Monarchy- human beings are essentially unfree o Forced to abide by laws that monarch sets forth o Humans cannot reason for themselves o God gives that person special dispensation / enlightens him  Divine right of kings  John Locke believes in contrary of Absolute Monarchy o We are naturally free humans o Able to reason on our own  Political power- revolves around punishment for crimes o Whether or not it inhibits the public good o Public good- private property and its preservation  Locke- private property is a reason to act  State of Nature – everyone is equal o State of perfect freedom o No innate ranking or social status within people o No such thing as subordination  Because we all have the same faculties (wills, reason) and no one intrinsically higher than someone else  Locke’s Law of Nature  we have the same desires o Golden Rule o Self-evident to us o What precisely distinguishes Hobbes’ and Locke’s laws of nature o Hobbes- since we want same things, we will compete with each other o Locke- reason grants us self-worth grant self worth to others too o Mindsets can change depending how well you know the other person o Subjective- mode of survival o When we observe human action, golden rule goes out the window o Reason- creatures of dignity  Hobbes- our motivation is based on our avoidance of force/war o Submission of our choices for our own security o State of nature- state of war o Hobbes- nothing beyond matter and motion; cannot allow for golden rule  Liberty and License – o It is distinct from Hobbes because it is distinct from License o License- Hobbes’s notion of liberty o Boils down to whether or not humans are aware of law  With a state of nature, you have ability and executive authority to kill someone o You have your own executive authority  You need government/authority to determine what the punishment should be  Same justifying reason for government as Hobbes - security o A state of war may or may not occur- ability to choose whether we get into conflict o State of war is an option- authoritarian type of government not necessary  Forms of government boil down to opinions on laws of nature  Objection pulled directly from Old Testament  Private Property o Does not want to appear as if he is disagreeing with the Bible o Absurd to have people seek authority from legislature who is not really there o Play on biblical passage to support nobility  Things become property through labor o Your body is your own, so what it acts on is an extension of your body o Labor adds to the value of nature o Taking it out of state of nature  private property  Earth is held in common because it’s impossible to seek permission from each individual person  Political society o Security o Impartial judge to settle disputes o Protect private property  Legislative power- make laws  Executive power- enforce them  In political society, you give up legislative and executive powers so you don’t take it too far o Powers conserved, but vested in someone other than you  Absolute monarchy is bad and no government at all no judge of monarch o Hobbes monarchy is best form of government  Majority vote because you submit to it  Limited to public good- property o Inherently negative- negative rights (non-interference)  You can’t make laws without telling them to the people, indifferent judge  Can’t take property without consent  Can’t transfer legislative power to other hands  Executive power o Internal violations  Legislative better than executive because it is done for the people  Legislative power o Needs consent of people  Tyranny- exercise of power beyond right  Revolution/opposition to unlawful ruling o Tyranny destroys the government and laws  Monarch is not government anyway, according to Locke o Don’t have to obey  Dissolution of government o Prince prevents legislative from meeting o Prince interferes election process o Making own laws o Defer power to another o Legislative invade property Descartes’s Discourse on Method  Mathematics is a science based on certainty o Contrasts with theology and philosophy  Philosophy and theology were imprecise and vague  Can you always be certain?  struggle in this philosophy o Quest for certain conclusions  Becomes disgruntled and thinks traveling and meeting others is more beneficial than studying books and reading in your own head  Four rules to always be certain in any problem you face 1) Never accept anything as true you did not plainly know to be such a. CLEARLY and DISTINCTLY (pure shapes, geometry) b. Senses are only in your mind c. Disagrees with Hobbes in that he does not believe that everything is matter 2) Break down problems a. Solve each premise individually 3) Conduct thoughts with simplest things first and then progress as you learn more  move onto the complex after 4) Be specific so that you do not leave anything out  These four rules will lead you to certainty Code of Morality 1) obey laws and customs of his country 2) Be resolute in actions and do not second guess a. Avoid paths that lead to or are prone to doubt 3) We should conquer our own self, not the world a. First responsibility  Stoics  Light of Reason – reason can distinguish what is true and false o Faculty used for truth and falsity Meditations on First Philosophy  Descartes Method for certitude in Philosophy o Method for Philosophical Inquiry called Method of Doubt  Ends up doubting his senses (other philosophy thought knowledge can come from senses)  Similar to what Socrates did  Very circular  Result of doubting indifference (you think the opposite could be true)  Only two sources of certainty: yourself and God  Argument for doubting senses: o You could be viewed as insane if you do not doubt o Limitations-  Measurements of objects change how close or far you are to it (what is the true image? What are we truly perceiving? o What do the senses actually tell us?  Being Awake vs. Being Asleep o Dreams can appear just as vivid as when we are awake o Descartes no clear way of discerning  Descartes prefers math because it is exact  Debating whether his thoughts are his own  Archimedes- o Buoyancy/Water displacement  Doubting whether he himself exists  Cogito- how do you know that you exist? 1) Proves that you exist 2) Clarifies who you are  Cannot think when you are asleep o Cannot doubt the fact that you doubt because then you are certain  Thinking Substance o “I think therefore I am”  The mind is better known than the body o You know that you are a thinking substance  Wax Experiment o You use descriptions based on senses o How do you know a piece of wax is wax? o Descartes says we know through your imagination o Redescription of matter o Mind better known than body  Matter is an extended substance o Must have quantity  Self is the first source of certainty Meditation 3  Wants to be certain of God’s existence because then he can be certain of other things, like his own existence  Has idea of perfect being inside of him and that had to come from somewhere  Idea- image of a thing o Picturing something in your mind  Adventitious Idea o Color, tree o Comes from senses o From experience o Not subject to the will  Innate Idea o Subject to will o Not directly from experience  Imagined Idea o An idea that you are born with o Not subject to will o Not from experience o No matter how hard you try, you will never see yourself o Subject of certainty  The idea of God is innate  You cannot have an imagined cause and real effect  Perfect being cannot be adventitious because you have to experience it o God cannot be imagined because then you would have to be God  You are not perfect  We are finite and only think in finite terms  Perfection- without flaw, without limitation  God is the source of our idea of a perfect being Meditation 4  Truth/falsity  Possibility of error? o What allows for this?  Error occurs whenever will extends beyond what reason has revealed to it  We are able to mismatch what we choose to think as true o Reason and will conflict with each other  We can correct our proneness to error by letting our reason beat out our will Meditation 5  The idea of an infinite being was put into us by someone o How do we cause something that is infinitely perfect? o This being must exist throws out cause and effect  Early Modern Rationalist and Imperialist o Rationalist- Descartes  We start from innate ideas planted in us, and this gives us certainty  You discover truths you do not fabricate o Example- the triangle  Essence and Existence o Essence- What something is o Existence- that it is (finite being do not have existence)  You have to show that something actually exists before you can think of its idea of existence o Descartes has already proven that he is a thinking being and that he clearly and distinctly perceives things o Objection- You cannot move from the idea to the thing  If you can doubt something from being true, you are uncertain  Original concept in question within the thing itself  Existence does not add anything


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

50 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Janice Dongeun University of Washington

"I used the money I made selling my notes & study guides to pay for spring break in Olympia, Washington...which was Sweet!"

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.