New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

CRJU 101 Exam 2 Study Guide

by: Richard Martin

CRJU 101 Exam 2 Study Guide CRJU 101 001

Richard Martin
GPA 3.59

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

These is the complete study guide for exam 2.
Criminal Justice 101
Corey Burton
Study Guide
CRJU 101, Criminal Justice, 101
50 ?




Popular in Criminal Justice 101

Popular in Criminology and Criminal Justice

This 5 page Study Guide was uploaded by Richard Martin on Friday February 19, 2016. The Study Guide belongs to CRJU 101 001 at University of South Carolina taught by Corey Burton in Winter 2016. Since its upload, it has received 85 views. For similar materials see Criminal Justice 101 in Criminology and Criminal Justice at University of South Carolina.

Popular in Criminology and Criminal Justice


Reviews for CRJU 101 Exam 2 Study Guide


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 02/19/16
Exam 2 Study Guide Thursday, February 11, 2016 6:24 PM Chapter 4 • mala in se vs mala prohibit a ○ Mala in se: a core of acts that are universally condemned or criminalized and considered harmful in themselves ○ Mala prohibit a: criminalized in particular places at particular times according to social attitudes surrounding those acts at the time, not because they are inherently evil • Felony vs misdemeanor ○ Felony: Typically carry a penalty of 1 year or more in jail or prison ○ Misdemeanor: Typically carry a penalty of less than a year in jail or prison or are punishable by fines or restitution • Limitations of Criminal Law: ○ Legality:  Based on the idea that law defines what is illegal, not legal  The government cannot punish citizens for wrongdoing in no specific laws exist forewarning them that the conduct is prohibited ○ Ex Post Facto:  The government cannot punish citizens for acts committedbefore the law prohibiting the behavior was passed  The government is also prohibited from increasing the punishment for a specific crime after the crime is committed ○ Due Process:  Addresses the limits that are placed on the government in terms of what can be considered to violate the law  Procedural due process also key ○ Void for Vagueness:  Criminal statutes are void for vagueness when they fail to clearly define the act prohibited  The average person must be able to clearly understand what is prohibited ○ Right to Privacy:  Although the right to privacy in one's home is well respected in the law, many acts are still criminal even when committedin the home ○ Void for Overbreadth:  Criminal laws cannot be drafted to prohibit specific acts while prohibiting other acts that would otherwise be legal ○ Cruel and Unusual Punishment:  Laws must specify the punishment to be applied for violating the law and the punishment cannot violate the 8th Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment • Corpus Delicti, elements that must be present for a crime to occur ○ Actus Reus: some act must occur, criminal thoughts must be acted upon 1. Voluntary movement 2. Omission in the face of duty to act 3. Possession ○ Mens Rea: refers to criminal intent ○ Concurrence: joining of Actus Reus and Mens Rea ○ Causation: refers to the idea that the criminal act itself is what caused the harm  Also known as Proximate Cause ○ Harm: result of the act or injury to victim, physical or mental, governmentsmay criminalize harm done to oneself if a societal harm exists • Mens Rea vs Motive ○ Mens Rea: not the intent to committhe crime ○ Motive: refers to the reason for which the crime was committed • Strict Liability: refers to behavior in which criminal liability will attach even if there is no intent, ex. Statutory rape • Inchoate Offenses (Incomplete Offenses) 1. Solicitation: urging, requesting or commanding of another person to commita crime  No intent or action required by the person being solicited  Carries a requirement of specific criminal intent  Is the furthest removed from actual criminal action and carries the lightest penalties 2. Conspiracy: requires at least 2 individuals, involves the planning of a crime and/or some action toward committingthe crime  Face to face contact is not necessary, mere communicationis sufficient for conspiracy 3. Attempt: occurs when there is a criminal act and intent but for some reason, the crime does not occur exactly as intended  Closest to a complete act and carries a greater penalty than solicitation or conspiracy  Criminal attempt generally cannot be renounced, ex. bank robbery • Criminal Defenses 1. Alibi: witness is willing to testify in court that a defendant could not have committedthe crime because the defendant 1. Alibi: witness is willing to testify in court that a defendant could not have committedthe crime because the defendant could not have been at the crime scene when the crime was committed  Credibility of an alibi witness is determined by the jury 2. Consent: defense that the victim in some way consented to his or her victimization  Professional sports in which violence is common 3. Entrapment: Based on the idea that criminal action must be voluntary  Occurs when government officials provide the defendant both the intent and means to commit a crime  Law enforcementis permitted to encourage people to commit crime 4. Immunity: generally refers to special protection granted to a defendant by the governmentfrom prosecution  4 types: Diplomatic Immunity, Legislative Immunity, Witness Immunity and Privilege 5. Duress: a defendant claims that a crime was committedas a result of force or the threat of force (ex. the crime was committednot of the defendant's free will) 6. Mistake or Ignorance of Fact or Law: simple ignorance of the law is generally not a valid excuse for violating the law  Mistake of fact is a valid defense (ex. theft)  "Factual Impossibility" is also not a valid defense in that the act and intent are still present (ex. attempted murder) 7. Necessity:applies to defendants who commitcrimes as a response to life-threatening situations  Claims that the crime is out of necessity and not because criminal intent is present 8. Self-Defense: individuals may use force to prevent an unprovoked attack which could cause the person serious harm or death  Individuals must use no more force than necessary  Applies to unprovoked attacks  Retreat Doctrine: Individuals must retreat from an attack if doing so does not put the person in danger  Castle Doctrine: a person need not retreat within the home in certain situations 9. Youth: traditionally, persons under a certain age could not be held criminally liable for their actions, at commonlaw:  <7 = No criminal liability  7-14 = Diminished criminal liability  +14 = Full criminal liability 10. Insanity: successful insanity defenses are extraordinarily rare and are seldom even raised  M'Naghten Rule: The person did not know the difference between right and wrong at the time the act was committed • How the Model Penal Code defines crime: set of guidelines for what are considered the best practices or legal codes, classifies crime according to the victim of the crime such as: ○ Crimes against the State ○ Crimes against Persons ○ Homicide ○ Crimes against Habitation ○ Crimes against Property Chapter 5 • Jurisdiction: refers generally to the geographic area of responsibility that a law enforcement agency has • 4 types of jurisdiction: ○ Federal ○ State ○ County/City ○ Municipal • Original 2 federal law enforcement agencies: U.S. Marshals Service and U.S. Postal Inspection Service • 3 major types of federal law enforcement: 1. Military Police 2. Tribal Police 3. Civilian Police • Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI) ○ Founded in 1908 ○ Changed drastically under directorship of J. Edgar Hoover ○ Grown significantly since the 1930swith dual responsibilities of criminal investigationsand domestic intelligence ○ Operates the FBI Academy in Quantico, VA ○ Administers the National Crime Information Center ○ Priorities are protecting the US from terrorist attacks and gathering informationrelated to foreign intelligence and espionage ○ Also investigates numerous other violations of federal law and assists state and local law enforcementagencies • U.S. Secret Service ○ Established April 15, 1865 ○ Part time protectionin 1894 ○ Full time protection in 1901 following assassination of William McKinley Responsible for investigating violationsof numerous federal laws related to counterfeit currency, financial fraud, cyber ○ Responsible for investigating violationsof numerous federal laws related to counterfeit currency, financial fraud, cyber fraud and other financial crimes as they relate to the support of terrorism ○ Protectiveresponsibilities include:  President, vice-president, major candidates, heads of state, first and second families and their children until 16  Former presidents  White House, Naval Observatoryand Foreign Embassies and Consulates in Washington, DC  National Special Security Events • Only state that doesn't have a state law enforcement agency: Hawaii • 2 primary functions of state law enforcement: highway patrol and investigations • Functions of county law enforcement: ○ Administered by a county Sheriff's Office ○ Sheriffs obtain their position through election ○ Along with deputies, responsible for many law enforcementfunctions within their respective county ○ Perform same basic police servicesas city police departments such as routine patrol and investigationsbut may vary depending on the jurisdiction ○ Sheriffs and their deputies also serve as officers of the court and operate county jails ○ Jurisdictional conflicts also exist between county and city law enforcement ○ Solution: many larger jurisdictions have movedto incorporating county and local agencies • Primary roles of local law enforcement: ○ Arguably most recognizable type of police, up to 60% of all sworn law enforcementpersonnel working for local law enforcementagencies ○ Jurisdiction restricted to city limits ○ Roles and responsibilities:  Traffic enforcement  Routine patrol and directed patrol  Investigating crimes  Order maintenance • City with largest local law enforcement: New York City Police Department is largest municipal police department in the US • Police Selection Hiring Processes: ○ Written exam ○ Oral board/interview ○ Physical fitness tests ○ Polygraph ○ Background check ○ Medical exam/drug screening ○ Psychologicalevaluation • Field Training vs In-Service Training ○ Following academy training, new officers may be assigned to a Field Training Officer (FTO) program ○ In-service training is performedthroughout an officer's career in order to maintain various job-related skills • Life of a Law Enforcement Officer: ○ Police departments and agencies are required to be staffed and on-call 24/7 ○ 9-5 shifts are very atypical in law enforcement ○ Officers may work shifts of 8-12 hours and work rotating shifts (alternating between day and night shifts) ○ For patrol officers, shifts are spent in assigned areas of responsibility or "beats", each with their own challenges • Police Subculture Law enforcementofficers by nature do a job that is different than most other professions ○ ○ Police officers tend to feel a sense of isolation from the public ○ Police offices also find support and solidarity within each other ○ Forms of police stress: fear of civil liability, workplace stress, family stress, and keeping up with the law ○ Police officers in general suffer from higher rates of suicide, drug and alcohol abuse, various mental and physical health problems and divorce than the general public ○ Police work is inherently dangerous, although police deaths in the line of duty are relatively rare ○ The unpredictability of police work refers to never knowing when a dangerous situation will arise or when one will become involved in a critical incident • Stress and Law Enforcement ○ Even though assaults on police officers and deaths in the line of duty are rare, they can and should influence hiring and training and can affect offices and departments in their aftermath ○ Suicide by Cop/Police:a suspect, without having intent to harm a police officer, places himself or herself in a situation where a police officer is compelled to use deadly force • Community Policing ○ In general, a partnership between police and the community to work together to combatcrime and disorder Emphasizes: crime prevention,quality of life, alternatives to arrest ○ Emphasizes: crime prevention,quality of life, alternatives to arrest ○ Broken Windows Theory: idea that ignoring public order violationsand disruptive behavior leads to community neglect, which fosters further disorder and crime ○ Zero Tolerance: with regard to Broken Windows, it is the practice of strict enforcementof minor offenses in order to send a message to other offenders • Posse Comitatus Act of 1878: act that limits the powers of local governments and law enforcement agencies in using federal military personnel to enforce the laws of the land • The roles and responsibilitiesof the federal law enforcement agencies ○ U.S. Marshals Service  Oversees federal court security, serve papers of federal courts, perform federal law enforcement duties  Movementand custody of federal prisoners, capture of inmates from federal penitentiaries, management and selling of government assets and protection of witnesses ○ U.S. Postal Inspection Service  Responsible for security of U.S. mail and mail carries and investigation of mail fraud  Law enforcementlimited to crime related to protecting the integrity of mail services ○ U.S. Secret Service  Full time protection in 1901 following assassination of William McKinley  Responsible for investigating violations of numerous federal laws related to counterfeit currency, financial fraud, cyber fraud and other financial crimes as they relate to the support of terrorism ○ Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI)  Grown significantly since the 1930s with dual responsibilities of criminal investigations and domestic intelligence  Operates the FBI Academy in Quantico, VA  Administers the National Crime Information Center  Priorities are protecting the US from terrorist attacks and gathering informationrelated to foreign intelligence and espionage  Also investigates numerous other violations of federal law and assists state and local law enforcement agencies ○ Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,Firearms and Explosives (ATF)  Responsible for regulating alcohol, tobacco, firearms, explosives and arson ○ Drug EnforcementAdministration (DEA)  Enforce U.S. controlled substances laws and regulations and to bring to criminal and civil justice systems of the U.S. ○ National Security Agency (NSA)  Responsibilities related to national security posed by foreign governments and powers ○ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)  Same responsibilities as the NSA but cannot conduct any operations on American soil • National Crime Information Center (NCIC):nation's largest database of computerized criminal information on wanted felons, people on parole, criminal history, and stolen items • The "operational strategies" of law enforcement: ○ Watchman Style: focused on maintaining order, in industrial blue-collar communities,broad discretion in enforcementof legal codes ○ Legalistic Style: focused on professionalism, associated with reform-mindedcities with mixed socioeconomiccommunities,police reflect a single standard of professionalism for the community ○ Service Style: protecting homogenouscommunity against outsiders, police provide service and informal interventionsfor community members,associated with suburban, middle class communities Chapter 6 • Direct Oversight vs Indirect Oversight ○ Direct Oversight: refers to how laws and judicial decisions influence police behavior ○ Indirect Oversight: refers to available remedies for citizens when agencies or officers do not observe legal standards • 3 Purposes of the Rule of Evidence: ○ Stipulate the requirements for the introduction of evidence ○ Define the qualifications of expert witnesses ○ Define when evidence is relevant to a case • Exclusionary Rule ○ Stipulates that evidence against a defendant is inadmissible if it is obtained in violation of constitutionally protected civil liberties and rights ○ Weeks vs US (1914) - U.S. Supreme Court creates the Exclusionary Rule ○ Mapp vs Ohio (1961) - U.S. Supreme Court rules that all states must adhere to the Exclusionary Rule • Fruit of the Poisoned Tree Doctrine ○ Expands on the Exclusionary Rule by stipulating that evidence obtained indirectly through illegal means is also inadmissible • Search: any activity performed in order to find evidence to be used in a criminal prosecution • Seizure: any instance in which a person is deprived of their liberty or freedom of movement or when an individual's property is seized or taken by a government actor following a search • Exceptions to arrest warrant 1. Search Incident to Arrest  A warrantless search of an arrested person immediately following their arrest  Limited to: person and anything they may be carrying, the person's "arm span", recently occupied vehicles  Limited to: person and anything they may be carrying, the person's "arm span", recently occupied vehicles 2. Plain-View Searches  Searches conducted by police officers when evidence of a crime is readily observable  Requirements: a lawful starting point, the item is "immediately apparent" 3. Consent to Search  Yes you can refuse a consent search  However, in cases where consent is granted, all evidence obtained is admissible  The catch is that the person granting consent must be allowed to do so □ Ex. Generally, other people cannot grant consent to search places where others have an expectation of privacy  It doesn't matter if you are aware of your right to refuse consent, you may still grant it  Consent searches cannot be the result of duress  Consent searches are limited to the person granting the consent  Consent may be withdrawn at any time 4. Automobile Searches  Carroll doctrine (Carroll vs US (1925))  Occur when a police officer has probable cause that evidence of a crime exists  Occur because delays in getting a warrant would result in the loss of evidence  Drug sniffing dogs are acceptable during traffic stops  Impound searches are also permissible 5. Pat Downs/Stop and ID  Pat downs or "Terry Frisks" are acceptable when there is "reasonable suspicion" that criminal activity is present (Terry vs Ohio 1968)  Pat downs are limited to the outer part of a person's clothing or the outer part of any bags or containers the person may be carrying  Searches that start as pat downs may be expanded if evidence is found  Stop and ID laws have been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court when a police officer has reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is present (Hiibel vs Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 2004) 6. Public Safety  Overall, police may conduct warrantless searches when probable cause exists to support the presence of a weapon and when not conducting the search would endanger the officer(s) involved or the general public  Airport, subway, border, school searches, some checkpoints (DUI, Crime Info) 7. Good Faith  Involves cases where a warrant is issued, but for some reason the warrant is later found to be invalid  Evidence obtained in good faith is admissible in court 8. Exigent Circumstances  Hot Pursuit restrictions: police must have a lawful starting point, applies only to "serious" offenses, scope is limited to what is reasonably necessary to prevent dangers posed by suspects and prevent escape • Interrogations and Confessions ○ In general, 5th and 6th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution establish the rules for interrogationsand confessions ○ Must be given knowingly and voluntarily ○ The Miranda Warnings  Originate in the case of Miranda vs Arizona (1966)  Suspects must be informed of their right to remain silent and their right to have an attorney prior to questioning  Spontaneous confessions are an exception • Law Enforcement Use of Force ○ Use of deadly force  The rules guiding police use of deadly force are driven by the Supreme Court's ruling in Tennessee v Garner (1985)  This case strikes down "fleeing felon doctrine"  However,the rule allows police to use deadly force to prevent the escape of a dangerous suspect or a suspect who presents a "clear and present danger" ○ Use of non-deadly force  Driven by the Supreme Court's ruling in Graham vs Connor (1989)  States that police officers may use less than lethal force in ways that are "objectivelyreasonable" in light of the circumstances  Many police departments use a "use of force continuum" to guide officers in appropriate use of force


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

50 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Janice Dongeun University of Washington

"I used the money I made selling my notes & study guides to pay for spring break in Olympia, Washington...which was Sweet!"

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.