×
Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to Rutgers - BIOL 119 - Class Notes - Week 2
Join StudySoup for FREE
Get Full Access to Rutgers - BIOL 119 - Class Notes - Week 2

Already have an account? Login here
×
Reset your password

RUTGERS / Biology / BIOL 119 / What are the characteristics of fraudulent papers?

What are the characteristics of fraudulent papers?

What are the characteristics of fraudulent papers?

Description

School: Rutgers University
Department: Biology
Course: Biology, Society, and Biomedical Issues
Professor: Anthony uzwiak
Term: Fall 2016
Tags: Biology, sociology, and medical sociology
Cost: 25
Name: BSB Issues 150, Week 2
Description: Covers ethical/unethical scientific research, reasons for misconduct, etc.
Uploaded: 09/23/2016
2 Pages 39 Views 3 Unlocks
Reviews


Week 2: Ethical Scientific Research


What are the characteristics of fraudulent papers?



19 September 2016, 22 September 2016

Biology, Society, and Biomedical Issues

Professor Uzwiak

Wendy Liu

IF – impact factor – yearly average # of citations to that article/journal; higher # = more influential First author – responsible for intellectual content of paper; first name in list of authors Principal Investigator (PI) – research group leader, lab head, etc.; last name in list of authors

Most scientific research is inductive - done in context of what’s already known (not deductive) ∙ Scientists are obligated to know the field first before researching

∙ You can’t accidentally replicate experiment bc you didn’t know that it exists already

Retractions – official removal of a previously published paper: the original article should not have been  published, it’s data and conclusions should not be used as part of the foundation for future research ∙ Results not contributing to truth


Scientists are obligated to?



∙ Negatively affecting society

∙ Almost 70% of all retractions are due to misconduct

Reason for scientific misconduct:  If you want to learn more check out What is the study of psychopharmacology?

Publications = currency of science

∙ Pressure for publications:

o Funding grant proposals

o Promotions

o Keeping jobs/positions – need to show that you excel at science

3 forms of misconduct

1) Fraud – 50% retractions attributable to fraud We also discuss several other topics like What is the barrier to the rotation of ethane?

a. Fabrication of data

b. Falsification of data

c. Violation of ethical standards

d. Etc.

2) Plagiarism – 10%

a. Taking others ideas, being aware of their work, using same methodology/approach, beat  them to publication


What are the forms of misconduct?



b. Using someone else’s style to write (bc you suck at scientific/technical writing) 3) Duplicate replication – <10%

a. Stealing data/info/graphs from your own work

b. Recycling data from past papers + republishing it

Predictors of committing fraud:

1. History of fraud – people who have committed fraud in the past are likely to repeat in the future a. ~53% of fraudulent papers are written by a first author who are repeat offenders i. only 18% of erroneous papers are written by repeat offendersIf you want to learn more check out What are the four fields of anthropology?

2. Geographical location – fraud is more common in USA, Germany, Japan, China, etc. a. Significantly more fraud than error among retracted papers from USA than rest of world b. USA+Germany+Japan+China account for ¾ of retractions due to fraud We also discuss several other topics like How do flowers get pollinated?
We also discuss several other topics like What are the other findings in thomson’s experiment where he discovered electrons?
If you want to learn more check out What is the order of the central dogma?

Characteristics of fraudulent papers:

∙ fraudulent papers have more authors

o diffusion of responsibility

o collaborators tend to also have retracted papers

∙ fraudulent papers take longer to retract that erroneous papers

∙ fraudulent papers are published in journals with higher IF

o one publication in a high IF journal is worth equal to or even more than many  publications in lower IF journals

Prof. Uzwiak’s solution to unethical scientific research

∙ Currently: no one but the researcher himself gets to see the “real data”

o Published data is all condensed forms of the original through statistics

∙ Suggestion #1: whoever funded the grant owns the data set

o if requested, researchers must provide the original data to the “owners”

∙ Suggestion #2: make data publicly available & accessible, which should be easer today b/c we  have more powerful technology (i.e. the internet)

Page Expired
5off
It looks like your free minutes have expired! Lucky for you we have all the content you need, just sign up here