New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

MC 401 Test #1

by: Carolina Chaves
Carolina Chaves
GPA 3.4

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

The First Amendment!!! most important The Constitution The Supreme Court Different Laws Know all the court cases we've gone over in class Know all vocab. KNOW the First Amendment
Mass Communication and Law Regulation
Dr. Diane Bragg
Study Guide
50 ?




Popular in Mass Communication and Law Regulation

Popular in Journalism and Mass Communications

This 14 page Study Guide was uploaded by Carolina Chaves on Thursday September 22, 2016. The Study Guide belongs to MC 401-320 at University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa taught by Dr. Diane Bragg in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 78 views. For similar materials see Mass Communication and Law Regulation in Journalism and Mass Communications at University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa.

Similar to MC 401-320 at UA

Popular in Journalism and Mass Communications


Reviews for MC 401 Test #1


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 09/22/16
Media Law Test #1 Study Guide st KNOW THE 1  AMENDMENT!!! Here it is: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free  exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people  peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Chapter 1:  I .           Common Law: What is it?  It is the inductive system in which a legal rule and legal standards are arrived at after  consideration of many cases involving similar facts. Also known as judge­made law. **Fundamental to common law is the concept that judges should look to the PAST and follow  precedents. Stare Decisis­the key phrase that means “let the decision stand”. A judge should resolve current  problems in the same manner as similar problems were resolved in past cases. “Caveat Emptor”= Let the buyer beware Problems with judge­made law: 1) Lack of accountability 2) Inconsistencies in rulings Decisions based on precedents” 1) Aided in uniformly applied law 2) Assumed the correctness of precedent What are the four Judicial Precedent options?? 1) Accept/follow the precedent 2) Modify/update a precedent to fit new facts 3) Distinguish the precedent 4) Overrule a precedent **Overruling or ignoring a precedent can lead to an opinion being overturned by a higher  court** II.        Equity Law: Ecclesiastical Courts­  An action is fair and just (ex. Divorce or bankruptcy)  1) Discretionary 2) Not bound by precedent 3) Not always monetary ­Common law was developed as an alternative to Equity Law­ III.       Statutory Law: Specific and precise  Bills are enacted and become statutes (ex. Federal Law­ U.S. code) ­U.S. criminal laws are all statutory laws­ IV.      Administrative Laws:  Regulates federal and state government agencies 1) Passes laws and regulations 2) Interprets those laws and regulations 3) Enforces compliance  Ex.­ Federal Communication Commission (FCC)         Food and Drug Administration (FDA)         Federal Election Commission (FEC) V.        Executive Actions or Orders:  Executive government offices make laws with executive orders or proclamations  Based on existing statutory powers  No action by congress or state legislature required 1) Homeland security department 2) Judicial Appointment Executive Restraints:  Power limited by the Constitution or charter that established the office  Can be overturned by the legislature or a court if the executive has exceeded his/her  power. VI.      Constitutional Law: The Supremacy Clause*  This constitution and the laws of the land= Judge in every state shall be bound by the law  of the land!! **This clause establishes that the federal constitution and federal law, generally take  precedence over state laws and even state constitutions** Constitutional Law: Highest Authority­Federal & State  Two main views of the Constitution:  ORIGINALIST vs. INTERPRETIVE(NON­ORIGINALIST) Originalist= Interprets the Constitution as it was written, word for word Interpretive/Non­Originalist= Have to adapt according to changes in time VII.     International Law:  Formal and informal treaties and agreements  Such law is paramount when international rights and duties are involved. ­Ex: United Nations and NAFTA *Be aware of applicable laws and customs* The Supreme Court The Majority of their decisions are majority/unanimous Who is Chief Justice??  John Roberts  Who is an Originalist Justice member?  Clarence Thomas Who is a Non­Originalist Justice member?  Ruth Bader Ginsburg (she’s the oldest on the court) Jurisdiction: Subject matter; geography, specific issues/parties American Courts: Trial or original jurisdiction: examine facts and apply law Appellate Jurisdiction:  Reviews application of the law  Usually does not seek new evidence  Affirms or reverses trial court verdicts U.S. District Courts: Federal Courts of original jurisdiction (trial) ; 1­4 in each state (population) U.S. Court of Appeals: Federal Courts of last resort; Thirteen Circuits (11 plus D.C. and Federal) **Alabama= 11  Circuit Which circuits of the U.S. Court of Appeals are most important to communication law?  Second Circuit (NYC): large media cases (number)  D.C. Circuit: Appeals by FCC & FTC   Ninth Circuit (West Coast) FOIA cases: deals w/ movie law suits and problems **The Supreme Court’s primary task is to act as an appellate tribunal for cases already decided  in lower federal and state courts…courts of last resort. Supreme Court Term: One year beginning on the 1  Mon. in October Writ of Certiorari: A Supreme Court writ agreeing to hear a petitioner’s case Rule of Four: at least four justices think a case has merit to receive a writ Direct Appeal: These are usually rejected Opinion of the Court: Majority Opinion­a justice voting with the majority writes the opinion.  Chief Justice or senior member in majority decides who writes an opinion. Plurality (controlling) Opinion: No majority opinion  No rationale or opinion has 5 votes (4­2­3) Concurring Opinion: A justice does not completely agree with the court’s rationale/opinion Dissenting Opinion:   Justice disagree with the majority  Later litigants can use to change opinion Ex.­ Justice Hugo Black’s 1942 dissent­ state court defendants have same right to counsel as federal defendants­became majority view in 1963.  Per Curiam: unsigned “by the court” Memorandum Order:  The court announces the vote without giving an opinion­usually cases of little legal  importance. Obiter Dicta:  A judge’s remarks which are not necessary to reaching a decision, but are made as  comm., illustrations or thoughts. Judicial Review  Any court, state or federal, has the right to declare any law or official gov. action invalid  because it violates a constitutional provision. Voir Dire: “To see, To say” the process in which potential jurors are questioned to determine if  they will be chosen to serve. Venire: Potential jurors for a trial will occur Venue: Place where a trail will occur Categories of Law Substantive Law: Governs case merits of a case; pertains to facts & fate of a case  What constitutes manslaughter  Definitions of degree of murder Procedural Law: Legal rules governing process; how law is made, administered and enforced.  Right to a speedy trial  Steps on how a procedure be held Criminal Law: Punishes criminal wrongs. The government (prosecution) charges a defendant  with a crime. Civil Law: Civil wrongs such as torts or breaches of contract; A private party (plaintiff) files a  lawsuit against a defendant. Summary Judgment: Avoid a jury trial­after “discovery”  Court rules that no facts remain to be decided  Judge makes decision U.S. Supreme Court: Stephen Breyer (Justice)  What he does/role he plays  Talks about cases/beliefs   How the Constitution impacts our country/people Chapter 2:  The First Amendment: **William Blackstone (English Jurist)  Commentaries on the Laws of England (1769)  He opposed prior restraint but believed writers were accountable for their words. Prior Restraint­ The government stops publication or prevents distribution of a printed product. Subsequent Punishment­ Sanctions for products that have already been published. **Peter Zenger:  New York Weekly Journal  Critical of New York Governor William Crosby  Zenger arrested for seditious libel in 1732 **Andrew Hamilton:  Argued against punishment for publishing the truth­Zenger was aquitted ( Jury  Nullification) In 1791, the adoption of the 1  Amendment began to offer protection for speech/press. The Constitution (1788):  Ratified only with promises of bill of rights  Absolutism (Theory): Justice Hugo Black:   FDR put him on the court (Supreme Court)  He wrote: “no law…abridging the freedom of speech” meant “…no law abridging.”  Justice Black also believed “speech” meant “speech”, and also conduct did not implicate  the First Amendment. Balancing Theories: Ad Hoc­ ex. Expression vs. military secrecy  Case by case decisions  Rare used­ not uniform  Can create a “Chilling Effect” (fear of doing wrong thing) Preferred Position Balancing Theory  Presumes government speech and press limits are unconstitutional  Places the burden of proof on the gov. (as in prior restraints) Meiklejohnian Theory­ Self Governance  Free expression related to self­governing is absolutely protected **Distinguishes public or political speech from private speech Voting= Most important political speech Theorists John Milton, Paradise Lost (1608­1674): “Whoever knew truth put the worst in a free and open encounter?”  Allows the discovery of truth…  Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (1841­1935): “….the best test of truth is for it to be accepted in the competition of the market.”  Abrams v. U.S. Checking Value Theory Vincent Blasi  “The checking value in First Amend. Theory” 1977  “Watchdog Function”  The press “checks” the power of the government  **Government abuse is worst abuse; more than private power** Stable Change Theory Thomas Emerson­  The system of Freedom of Expression (1970)  Free expression can act as a safety valve­suppression of speech may cause violence **Reform or Revolution** Individual or Self­Fulfillment Theory John Locke (1632­1704)  Two Treaties of civil government­ people have “natural rights”  Suppression of speech suppresses an element of humanity **Government should foster free speech** Access Theory:  “Freedom of the press belongs to the man who owns one,” AJ Liebling  Access Theory rejected by the Supreme Court in Miami Herald v. Tornillo (1974)   Government cannot force a newspaper to publish a citizen’s views or ideas  Fairness Doctrine for broadcast ended (1987, 2011) **Theory  does not equal  Interpretation** Interpretation (Original Intent) Originalism Key Words:  “Original Understanding” “Framers” “Founding Fathers” Ex.­ Justice Scalia Non­Originalist (Interpretive): ­The Constitution should be interpreted in light of societal changes. Ex.­Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Justice Stephen Breyer **Does NOT simply mean interpreting each case on its own or based on opinion… Originalism & Non­Originalism = Interpretation Chapter 3: Conduct and Speech Types of Conduct: 1. No Communicative Value 2. Purely Communicative Conduct  The Supreme Court rarely allows govern. Regulation of purely comm. Conduct (has  expressive conduct) 3. A mix of comm. And non­comm. Elements   The Court decides if the conduct is expressive and whether it warrants 1  Amend.  Protection   Ex.­Honking your horn Is the Conduct Expressive? The Symbolic Speech Doctrine helps determine if conduct is expressive…  Is there the intent to express a message?  Is there a substantial likelihood a witness will understand the message? Texas v. Johnson (1989)  Johnson intended to express a message  Spectators understood he was protesting some action, yet deemed obscene Conduct deemed obscene or in violation of safety laws may not be protected. If the conduct is ruled expressive, the court moves to the second question… st Is the expressive conduct protected by the 1  Amendment?  Conduct like this= not acceptable Then the Court asks: Does a government regulation directly suppress free expression?  If the answer is: Yes­ Strict Scrutiny Test (regulation of content) Strict Scrutiny Test (Regulation directly suppresses speech­content based)  No compelling interest to stop flag burning in Texas v. Johnson  There is minimal restriction of free expression  It is not vague or overboard  “Crush Videos” United States v. Alvarez (2012) 6­3  The Stolen Valor Act outlawed lying about military honors. Alvarez lied about being a  medal of honor recipient.  Problem?  The court said the law was written so broadly it infringed on free speech.  How can it be improved?  Some of the justices suggested the law could be rewritten to focus only on those who lie  about military awards in order to gain benefit. Does a government regulation directly suppress free expression?  If the answer is: No: Intermediate Scrutiny (content neutral­often deals w/ conduct)   Intermediate Scrutiny or the O’Brien Test United States v. O’Brien (1968)  O’Brien expressed a message. People understood it—but the draft card law was content  neutral…its purpose was to protect Vietnam War.  Intermediate Scrutiny 1) Regulation must be content neutral 2) Regulation is not a complete ban 3) Regulation is supported by a substantial govern. Interest  4) Regulation is narrowly drawn/tailored (does not exceed purpose) Time, Place & Manner Restrictions:  Black College students denied service at “white only” lunch counters.  Civil Rights protests prompted many of these restrictions **All messages must be treated the same way (permits, etc. )** Traditional Public Forums: Peaceful Picketing:  Picketing restrictions must be content neutral  Picketing usually cannot be banned from public property Public Property that is NOT a Public Forum:  Signs on a phone line pole  Mailbox Chapter 4: Defamation, or Libel, is what lawyers call a tort, or a civil wrong.  Libel: is the publication or broadcast of any statement that…  Injures someone’s reputation or  Lowers that person’s esteem in the community Damage Claims:  IT is not uncommon for libel plaintiffs to exaggerate the harm caused by the publication  or broadcast of a negative story, seeking enormous sums of money to repair the damage.  The mass media win most libel suits brought against them, or manage to settle the  lawsuits for far less money. Time and Money:  All lawsuits take time to resolve. Defending a libel suit is far more complicated than  writing a will or seeking damages for an automobile accident. Time and the Law:  The likelihood of defamatory material being published or broadcast today is  extraordinarily high, given the volume of words and pictures transmitted in the media. Resolving the Problem?  Proposals that states provide some kind of arbitration system to resolve issues of libel  have also been advanced, but most have been met with little enthusiasm. Law of Defamation:  An attempt by government to establish a forum for persons involved in a dispute brought  about by an insult or by what we today call a defamatory remark. Elements of Libel:  Defamation is any communication that holds a person up to contempt, hatred, ridicule or  scorn. 1) Defamation is a communication that damages the reputation of a person, but not  necessarily the individual’s character. 2) To be actionable defamation, the words must actually damage a reputation. There must  be proof offered that the individual’s reputation was harmed. 3) At least a significant minority of the community must believe that the plaintiff’s  reputation has been damaged, but the minority must not be as unrepresentative minority.  Survival Statutes:  For relatives to continue to pursue the lawsuit of the family member. Publication:  Means that one person, in addition to the source of the libel and the person who is  defamed, sees or hears the defamatory material. Scienter:  “guilty knowledge” Identification:  The injured party must show the court that the allegedly defamatory statement is “of and  concerning him, her, or it.”  Trade Libel:  Product disparagement, focuses on the product itself.   A libel of a business tends to focus on the alleged failing of the people who operate the  business. Chapter 5: More Libel What is Actual Malice?  a condition required to establish libel against public officials or public figures and is  defined as "knowledge that the information was false" or that it was published "with  reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." Reckless disregard does not encompass mere neglect in following professional standards of fact checking.  It is require for:  Public official and public figures New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), 9­0 Case Description:  Montgomery commissioner of public affairs, L.B. Sullivan, sued the New York Times for running the ad.  He said the ad libeled him and won a $500,000 judgment, which was upheld by the  Alabama Supreme Court. Issue: Can a public official win a libel action based solely on a “test of truth” Holding: NO! A public official conduct, if the official can prove actual malice.  Opinion: Justice William Brennan: fear of libel prosecution would have a chilling effect on  speech and would be “…comparable to ‘self­censorship’.” ***This was an ad not a story! Important to know!  Gave some protection for Advertising   


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

50 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Amaris Trozzo George Washington University

"I made $350 in just two days after posting my first study guide."

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.