×
Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to SSU - PHL 203 - Class Notes - Week 9
Join StudySoup for FREE
Get Full Access to SSU - PHL 203 - Class Notes - Week 9

Already have an account? Login here
×
Reset your password

SSU / Philosophy / Phi 203 / cost-benefit analysis is a device used to determine whether it's worth

cost-benefit analysis is a device used to determine whether it's worth

cost-benefit analysis is a device used to determine whether it's worth

Description

School: Salem State University
Department: Philosophy
Course: Business Ethics
Professor: Krishna dr
Term: Fall 2016
Tags: business and ethics
Cost: 25
Name: Ethics: Chapter 7 Notes
Description: These are my Chapter 7 notes on Moral Issues in Business by Shaw and Barry.
Uploaded: 12/05/2016
7 Pages 91 Views 0 Unlocks
Reviews



o To satisfy its disproportionate consumption of nonrenewable resources, America turns to foreign lands, which raises two moral questions ∙ How will the continued availability of foreign resources be secured?




∙ Who, exactly, is responsible for the pollution?




∙ Who Should Pay the Costs?



Chapter 7: The Environment Saturday, December 3, 2016 6:55 PM ∙ Clean Water Act (1972): passed by Congress with the goal of  eliminating all water pollution by 1985 ∙ EnvironmentDon't forget about the age old question of dendrites in a neuron send outgoing signals to other cells.
We also discuss several other topics like where are the general senses located?
If you want to learn more check out What refers to the features that further distinguish the sexes and play a role in mate attraction?
We also discuss several other topics like How do substances secreted into nephrons?
We also discuss several other topics like ensonhs
We also discuss several other topics like hacs themes
al Protection Agency (EPA): enforce the Clean Water Act,  going after companies that violate it ∙ Clean Air Act (1970): banned lead as a fuel additive of gasoline ∙ Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: require further measures be  taken to fight smog, acid rain, and toxic emissions Business and Ecology ∙ Ecology: the science of the interrelationships among organisms and  their environments o Interdependence exists among all entities of the environment ∙ Ecosystems: a total ecological community, both living and nonliving o A change in any one element can have ripple effects throughout the  system o Ex: reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone Park effected all the other  animals o Humans possess the power to upset dramatically the stability of  natural ecosystems o Many commercial activities have unpredictable and often disruptive  environmental consequences ∙ Example: nitrogen fertilizer o Sometimes unseen benefits result from tampering with ecosystems  ∙ Oil spills forced animals to find better habitats and increased the number of fish ∙ Business's Traditional Attitudes Toward the Environment o One is the tendency to view the natural world as something free and  without limit, something we can exploit without regard to the future o Both pollution and the depletion of natural resources involve using up  something that is in a limited supply o Tragedy of the Commons: thee can be a difference between the private costs and the social costs of a business activity ∙ Described by Garrett Hardin ∙ Ex: animals grazing in the common & destroying it ∙ Each person's pursuit of self-interest makes everyone worse off o Externality (Spillover): the disparity between private  industrial costs and public social costs and public social costs ∙ Businesses overlook this  ∙ Arises in context of resource depletion ∙ In sum, externalities or spillover effects, pursuits of private interest at the  expense of the commons, and a view of the environment as a free good that  can be consumed without limit have combined with an ignorance of ecology  and of the often fragile interconnections and interdependencies of the natural  world to create the serious environmental problems facing us today The Ethics of Environmental Protection∙ Much of what we do to reduce, eliminate, or avoid pollution and the depletion of scarce natural resources is in our collective self-interest ∙ Free-Rider Problem: the temptation to shirk individual responsibility  and benefit from the efforts of others ∙ Business have an implicit social contract that reflects what society hopes to  achieve by allowing businesses to operate o Businesses that try to be free-riders or refuse to address the spillover  or external costs of their business activities violate this contract ∙ Right to a Livable Environment: each human has a right to a livable  environment which is essential for one to fulfill his/her human  capacities o Argued by moral theorist William Blackstone o A result of the changing environmental conditions which affect human  life o Recognition of this moral right would provide compelling grounds for  establishing a legal right for a livable environment ∙ This would enhance our ability to go after polluters and other  abusers of the natural environment o Still faced with the economic and moral costs  ∙ The Costs of Pollution Control o We must consider the quality of the environment we want o What is necessary to bring about the kind of environment we want o What will it cost to improve the environment o Cost Benefit Analysis: a device used to determine whether the  it's worthwhile to incur a particular cost ∙ To evaluate the project's direct and indirect costs and benefits,  the difference being the net result for society ∙ Extremely difficult to make reliable estimates of actual costs and benefits, of putting price tags on the different effects of the policy  being considered o Ecological Economics: a new discipline attempting to expand  further the boundaries of environmental cost-benefit analysis by  calculating the value of an ecosystem in terms of what it would  cost to provide the benefits and services it now furnishes us ∙ Traditional market pricing fails to capture the economic benefits  that nature provides o Cost-benefit analyses of rival environmental policies will frequently  prove controversial because they inevitably involve making value  judgements about nonmonetary costs and benefits ∙ Costs can include time, effort, discomfort, and lost opportunities ∙ Benefits can include health, comfort, enjoyment, scenic beauty,  self-fulfillment, and so on ∙ Difficult to quantify ∙ Who Should Pay the Costs? o Restoring the environment or even just helping businesses and  individuals to climate change could well up being the biggest economic  enterprise of our times, a huge source of jobs, profits, and poverty  alleviation o Those responsible for causing the pollution ought to pay or those who  stand to benefit from protection and restoration should pick up the tab∙ Those Responsible ∙ Who, exactly, is responsible for the pollution? ∙ Many people argue that big business is the chief polluter  and therefore ought to bear the costs ∙ But consumers have also benefited by not having  to pay higher prices for products ∙ Consumers create the demand for the  products whose production impairs the environment ∙ Population and the increasing concentration of population  in urban areas are causes of environmental degradation ∙ Also the ever-increasing demand for goods and services,  natural resources, energy and industrial production ∙ As people get more money to spend, they buy and  consume more tangible goods, discard them more quickly, and  produce more waste, all of which put pressure on the  environment ∙ In conclusion, the enemy turns out to be all of us in this  case  ∙ Those Who Would Benefit ∙ Workers in certain industries and people living in certain  neighborhoods or regions benefit more than other people from  environmental controls  ∙ The trouble with this argument is that every individual,  rich or poor, and every institution, large and small stands to  benefit in some way from environmental protection and  restoration, albeit not necessarily to the same degree ∙ Pollution touches everyone ∙ This position means that individuals and groups should  pay to the degree that they will benefit, but one must wonder  how this could possibly be determined ∙ Although we all share some responsibility for pollution,  certain companies and industries stand out as excessive  polluters ∙ Electric-power plants & coal-burning plants ∙ In conclusion, the point is that a fair and just program for  assigning costs begins with recognition that we all bear some  responsibility for our environmental problems and that we all  stand to benefit from correcting them Achieving Our Environmental Goals ∙ Without an environmentally informed citizenry making conscientious political, business, and consumer choices, it will prove impossible to reverse the  degradation of our environment by halting pollution, stemming global warming, and reducing the utilization of natural resources to sustainable levels ∙ Government has a crucial role to play by initiating programs that prod  business to behave in a more environmentally responsible ways ∙ Regulations o Regulatory Approach: makes use of direct public regulation  and control in determining how the pollution bill is paido Although a regulatory approach is fair in the sense of setting legally  enforced standards that apply to all, it has four drawbacks ∙ Pollution statutes and regulations generally require polluters to  use the strongest feasible means of pollution control ∙ Although universal environmental standards are fair in the sense that they apply to all equally, this very fact raises questions about  their effectiveness ∙ Regulation can also take away an industry's incentive to do more than the minimum required by law ∙ The problem of displacement costs resulting from industrial  relocation or shutdown due to environmental regulations o But if regulations are tougher for new entrants to an industry than for  existing forms, as they often are, then new investment may be  discouraged- even if newer plants would be cleaner than older ones ∙ Incentives o Incentive Approach: minimizes government interference in  business and encourages voluntary action rather than coercing  compliance ∙ By allowing firms to move at their own pace, it avoids that  evident unfairness to firms that cannot meet regulatory standards  and must either relocate or fail ∙ Provides an economic reason for going beyond the minimum o An incentives-based approach is likely to be slow, sometimes amounts  to paying polluters not to pollute, and can be distorted by special interests ∙ Pricing Mechanisms and Pollution Permits o Pricing Mechanisms: programs designed to charge firms for  the amount of pollution they produce ∙ Can be divided by specific types of pollution ∙ Places the cost of pollution control squarely on the polluters ∙ Penalize rather than compensate ∙ Firms are encouraged to do more than meet the minimal  requirements  ∙ Pollution costs would become production costs o Pollution Permits: instead of imposing a tax or a fee on the  pollutants released into the environment, the government could  charge companies for pollution permits, or auction off a limited  number of permits ∙ Could give companies permits to discharge a limited amount of  pollution then allow them to buy and sell the right to emit pollutions ∙ Companies with low pollution levels can make money by selling  their pollution rights to companies with poorer controls ∙ Each firm can estimate the relative costs of continuing to pollute as opposed to investing in cleaner procedures ∙ Fairness calls for input from all sectors of society, a deliberate commitment  by all parties to work in concert, a sizable measure of good faith and perhaps  above all else a heightened sense of social justice ∙ Environmental protection isn't a static or zero-sum trade-off ∙ Higher environmental standards can pressure companies to invest in new  technology, thus enhancing efficiency as well as reducing pollutionDelving Deeper Into Environmental Ethics ∙ Global Environmental Fairness o We need to consider our obligations to those who live outside our  society ∙ US relies too much on the natural resources of other countries  and consumes more than any other nation o Many economists believe that measures to reduce greenhouse gas  emissions may improve US productivity in the long run o Tropical rain forests are also a concern ∙ They are the earth's richest, oldest, and most complex  ecosystem ∙ Are major reservoirs of biodiversity ∙ Half of the world's rain forest has disappeared o Global climate change is an issue ∙ Greenhouse gases from industrialization are destabilizing the  world's climate ∙ The countries that are the least equipped to handle it are  dealing with the major consequences o The inequalities of the world's environmental troubles thus raise the  question of the nature and extent of the obligation, if any, of the advanced industrialized nations to assist poorer nations to deal with the effects of  climate change and environmental degradation, which we -not they- have  brought about o To satisfy its disproportionate consumption of nonrenewable resources, America turns to foreign lands, which raises two moral questions ∙ How will the continued availability of foreign resources be  secured? ∙ Will it lead to the US trying to politically and economically  control other countries? ∙ Would involve violations of rights and interests of  the dominated population ∙ Does any one nation have the right to consume the world's  irreplaceable resources at a rate to grossly out of proportion to the  size of its population? ∙ Are we respecting the needs and interests of both our  present co-inhabitants on this planet and the future generations  to come? ∙ Obligations to Future Generations o Future Generations: our remote descendants are not yet alive  and thus cannot claim a right to a livable environment o It would be wrong to empty the globe of resources or to irreparably  contaminate the environment that we pass on to future generations o Philosopher Joel Feinberg argues that whatever future beings turn out  to be like, they will have interests that we can affect, for better or worse,  right now ∙ This is enough to both talk coherently about their having rights  and to impose a duty on us not to leave ecological time bombs for  them ∙ Contingent on future people coming into existenceo Even if we are persuaded that the future generations have rights, we  still do not know exactly what those rights are or how they are to be  balanced against the interests and rights of present people o The policies we adopt will affect who is born in the future  ∙ Could affect the standard of living o Annette Baier argues that the important thing is to "recognize our  obligations to consider the good of the continuing human community" ∙ Stance suggests adopting a utilitarian perspective o John Rawls suggests that members of each generation put themselves  into the original position to decide what would be a just way of distributing resources between consecutive generations ∙ The Value of Nature o A radical approach to environmental ethics challenges the human centered assumption that preserving the environment is good only  because it is good for us o Naturalistic Ethic: nature can have value in and of itself, apart  from human beings o Philosophers disagree about whether nature has intrinsic value o Adopting a human-oriented point of view, some theorists contend that  the environment is valuable only because human beings value it o However, those adopting a naturalistic ethic believe that the value of  nature is not simply a function of human interests ∙ Would change our way of looking at nature ∙ Natural objects have no interests ∙ Our Treatment of Animals o Animals have at least a rudimentary cognitive awareness o Many contemporary philosophers argue that because animals have  genuine interests, they have genuine moral rights-despite the fact that  they cannot claim their rights o Animals do not have to be equal to human beings to have certain  moral rights that we must respect o Utilitarians would stress that higher animals are sentient- capable of  feeling pain ∙ Our actions have effects on animals, and these consequences  cannot be ignored o Business affect animals through experimentation and the testing of  products on animals ∙ Utilitarians are willing to permit this as long as the overall results justify their pain and suffering o Factor Farming ∙ Business's largest and most devastating impact on animals is  through the production of animal-related products- mainly meat ∙ The desire of the meat and animal-products industries to  economize leads to their treating animals in ways that many reject as cruel and immoral o Is It Wrong to Eat Meat? ∙ Moral Vegetarians: people who reject the eating of meat  on moral grounds ∙ They are against the sacrifices of the most important and  basic interests of animals simply to satisfy human tastes∙ Some philosophers contend that it is permissible to raise  animals for food if their lives are, on balance, positive ∙ Other moral theorists challenge this view, saying that at  least higher animals have a right to life and should not be killed ∙ In general, however, other countries are ahead of the US with  respect to their treatment of animals

Page Expired
5off
It looks like your free minutes have expired! Lucky for you we have all the content you need, just sign up here