Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to OSU - ECON 4140 - Class Notes - Week 2
Join StudySoup
Get Full Access to OSU - ECON 4140 - Class Notes - Week 2

Already have an account? Login here
Reset your password

OSU / Economy / ECON 4140 / Define law of diminishing returns.

Define law of diminishing returns.

Define law of diminishing returns.


School: Ohio State University
Department: Economy
Course: Economic History of the Americas
Professor: Ethan doetsch
Term: Fall 2016
Tags: Economics and history
Cost: 25
Name: Econ 4140 Week 1-2
Description: Notes for first two weeks of the semester. May not be as clear as following weeks because they were before I accepted a note taking position for another student. I earned a 99% on the first midterm for this class, a 97% on the second.
Uploaded: 12/05/2016
8 Pages 92 Views 4 Unlocks


Define law of diminishing returns.

Exams based on lecture ONLY


Date 8 24

• US GDP per capita has a x60 since 1700

o Brazil & Mexico x14 , Hat 1.75*

→ Global x12 o you get rich when your farmers become manufacturers

• Nes classical Growth Model

Define geography.

We also discuss several other topics like When do we use the z-test?

y = f(K,L) real GDP factors of Production We also discuss several other topics like What are planned contrasts in anova?





& Law of Deminishing Returns if other ç'as LÀ Yat a decreasing rate varicbia .as K7 Yi at a decreasing rate



Define institutions.



• Cobb-Douglas Specification

output= AKO 13 => AK L'* - assuming constart returns to scale Don't forget about the age old question of What is an example of self­enhancement in the us?

q=p=1>P=1-6 d = output elasticity of capital

=%A4%AK p = Output elasticity of labor If you want to learn more check out What was the greatest confederate victory?

B = %Y%AL - also assuming perf. compet. markets

d=share of out put that goes to capital owners

B = labor share of output *X-U.S. 6=0.3 B =0.7'

☆ historically rather stable; little A

Study SOU

- Date 8 26 16

Y=AKALB Cobbs - Douglass cont.

YL = output per worker Ciabor productivity) We also discuss several other topics like Is tongue rolling homozygous or heterozygous?

YIK = out put per unit of capital (capital productivity

GA L B total factor productivity (TFP) take not. log

InY= luat aluk & Blut We also discuss several other topics like How are viruses adsorbed onto the surface of their cognate host cells?

luy-lul = lu Ataluk +Phul-lul

ha (1/2) = hataluk + (1-0) Aal-lul de output per worker

lu (1/2) = A + alik-alul 4/= cap / labor ratio

y luA + 2(lank-enh]

hall/L) = huA talu (1/2) = derrive

A/W =






growth rate


route of labor

of capllab ratio xa

of TFD


& There are a ways to grow output of labor

1. 1 TEP ()

2. 9 capital por worker (Capital Deepening)

•Calcuccting TFP


TEP represents innovation + technological growth in part

there are other factors; things we don't know - everything that influences ec. growth that is not

capital deepening - historically largest contributor to ec. growth

26 16

Date 8 y growth is driven by TFP, better use of capital + labor

Lespecially in mid-20th century (1930s - 1960s)

• but like...how do you ITFP

- tech. A, more know ledge, innovation - division of labor + specialization - economies of scale'

as q↑ ATCL - resource allocation organization

ex. Homestead Act - human capital

skills, abilities of workers

• better education or health


-British NA

relatively poor

fewer slaves

- Saint Domingue (Hati)

-> sugar > $$$ La relatively rich

mostl slaves tho

study soul



- USA, Canada

- Hati relatively rich

Irelatively How did this happen?

Ly next page!


Study sou




Calt. IDK man I think Date 8 29 16

Inst. it might be as simple as

"places that got colonized Theories of very-Long-Run Economic Growth got fucked.com

4 Geography

8/31 damn lol I was

X-climate + worker effort/productivity

Loheat thumidity productivity 4 the Great Reversal

most prospurous places are hot in 1500

today, it's the reverse generally - Diamond "Guns, Germs + Steel

. - agriculture

•Eurasia is first to farm

Lolots of biodiversity domesticated

E-W axis tilt reasy transfer of tech, al climate ..so why not China?

4. Industrial Revolution (Asia came late) 107-Disease Border

•mosquitoes are humanity's worst erlemy


•v investment in human capital

-ya don't live long enough

• sort of true- at least in Sub-Sahasen Africa

Labut can't explain everything 2) Culture

X-Religion "Weber Thesis."

Co calvinism → capitalism nec. growth

- world is black & white, saved unsaved

-"live your calling" "vocation

s - work hard, be saved; don't show off ec. growth bunemployment = corrupt

- -no luxuries *BUT 360 y bt take-off

a savings



Date 8 © Culture (cont.)

X- National Origins

• English colonies are doing well

"-India, bruh. what the fuck kind of

( 3.) Institutions - Structure human interactions, recles of society

•war, crime

s must be STABLE

o-economic institutions

property rights - assets + income go to owner

legal situations must be STABLE

riskl benefits of adding capital -"Good" Economic Institutions,

i. Secure property right: ii, equced access to ecor.omic resources

need many ppl to invest

iij. inclusive, not exclusive

v derermined by -"Good" Political Institutions

i. checks balances ii. pol. power → broad groep wat investment opportunities di limited "rents"

4 monopolies, competition = ppl aven't trying to use govt to get rich

greedy rich people ruin everything

Study Sou


"Korean Experiment"

Date 8 31 16

North Korea South Korea

• property no property/geog

rights & culture

• free market . mo markets

democracy dictatorship


- NK is poor

SK is rich

institutions explain


Africa S. America

N. American


"Colonial Experiment" - former European Colonies

* mortality of Euro Settlers - Selliement | Extractive Carribbeans die easier in tropics

erica don't settle low mortality I high mortality

wes= milder climates similar obring Euro laws . do not bring laws Australia to Euro; low mortality good pol. =

poor bad institutions L

Ļ settle

ec. institutions ? democracy

*built on violence *more examples: • Kill natives but which state power - Carribbean, S. USA, Brazil y know at least the forced labor

chattle slavery

economy is poppin' *0%. "ecomiendan system -Belgian Congo

brights to land AND

native labor forced labor on rubber plantations

(Spanish Mexico) chopping off arms for low productivity

☆ Colonial institutions continue after independence -> Why?

1. Changing institutions is expensive

4 revolutions are rare 2. Local Elite still in charge, benefit from bad institutions

u don't change their 3. Complimentary investments to institutions

's you got all this capital in slaves, who give it up * Settlement colonies get rich * Extractive colonies Stay poor

Date 8 31 16 error term

✓ random noise v= Bo+B, PR +ů - Omi Hed variables


! Study Soun


GDP per capita

• Slope = B, -




Definitions - Prop. Rights o cov(x,y)=E((x-8)(y-7))

1. - x^. yf; y^ , x9 Posi assume cov (PR, 4) = 0

3 coulx,y)

- xdre yd i yt, xd so y-Be + B, BR+

-*, yt, xt, y9

o cor(x,y) 20 Negative Covly, PR) = ccrlbg, PR]+ B cov(PR, PR]+ caule PR) - cov(x,y)=0 Covly,PR)= B, var(PR)

4x+y not related tovar(x)=E((x-x) 2)

{ variance of x var (PR)

B = how much does A in PR so in English this means... effects ing.

of slope is how y + PR more together/ how much PR varies

*AJR: B; → 1 unit A PR >5041 iny * of course, OLS is not convincing

- ble it's only correlation, correlation causation

© reverse causality bald = marriage or marriage = baid

@ omitted variable sage * -50 maybe 94 → TPR blc poor people have no property to

protect, while rich people do - or 3rd mystery variable

B, = Covly, PB)

Study soup

Date 9 o omitled variable

·cov (U, PR)+ 0 violates our assumption

couly, PR) = Bivar (PR) + covku,PR)

Bi= covly, PR)-coulu, PR)- > omitted variable bias

var (PR)


night either şunless z kanou a to

be random


Potential Solution to OVB.

Z → PR y >> instrumental variable

COV (2, PR) 20 } if z1, & then y^, PRY CoV (2, u) = 0 s but you can't prove this right either sunt

LA,J,R's 2 = Settler mortality

treated as random, so corla, z) -O

I O by

V ASSUMITIONS cov ly, mort) = cov ko, mort) +3, cov (PR, mort)+coyla, mort)

- covly, mort) I Bi= cov (PB, mort) colonization isn't random tho

if cov(2, u) #0

1 couly, mort) - couca, mort)

COU (PR, mort) Strike.ex. there IS NO CORRELATION btwn mort + PR cov(PR, mort) -0

Albouy we have bad data on mortality

1. SAJ, R filled in gaps on their own? Curiked - you can fill in gaps another way, t covipo, mort) = 0

•ex, coulú , mort) $0

-ignores human capital, reason for colonization

Settlement colonses get big boost from human capital - property rights don't matter, human capital does

Laeser ex, con

Page Expired
It looks like your free minutes have expired! Lucky for you we have all the content you need, just sign up here