Exam 3 Review
Exam 3 Review PSY/LING 34
Popular in Language Development
verified elite notetaker
Popular in Linguistics and Speech Pathology
This 1 page Study Guide was uploaded by Texana Sonnefeld on Saturday April 25, 2015. The Study Guide belongs to PSY/LING 34 at University of Arizona taught by Louann Gerken in Spring2015. Since its upload, it has received 101 views. For similar materials see Language Development in Linguistics and Speech Pathology at University of Arizona.
Reviews for Exam 3 Review
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 04/25/15
Language deprivation 1MS 3MC Bilingual development ZLA asking you to describe graphs 2MS not exactly what was on the self tests its easier it the Matching 2rld graph is how proficient we ll be Signed language 3 MS 1 MC 1 MS about nature of critical period effects from the end of the lecture table with different theories evidence for and against 3 phonological features in signed language palm orientation movement hand shape Language disorders 3 MS 1 MC Theories 1 MS 2 MC 1 matching theory to predictions What is evidence main source of generalization is genetics last lecture evidence that language is innate to humans and not learned through input triggering Languages around the world share many properties something about humans that have languages the way they do Human language is different from animal submeaning units and meaningful units Signed and spoken language has similar parts Question on the selftests what questions are we trying to answer about bilingualism critical period Question selftest American signed language closer to French signed language school for the deaf in Paris in Gallaudet Gallaudet university in Washington DC brought school of deaf to DC and is now the core of American sign language After age 7 across the board worse or not good at something particular tells us that all parts of language is not learned together parts are learned differently One of the hypotheses about critical period older learners experience interference from their old language counter evidence to that 9
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'