×
Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to UT - Study Guide - Midterm
Join StudySoup for FREE
Get Full Access to UT - Study Guide - Midterm

Already have an account? Login here
×
Reset your password

UT / Sociology / ANTH 120 / Where were oldowan artifacts excavated?

Where were oldowan artifacts excavated?

Where were oldowan artifacts excavated?

Description

School: University of Tennessee - Knoxville
Department: Sociology
Course: Prehistoric Archaeology
Professor: Kandace hollenbach
Term: Fall 2018
Tags: neanderthals and mousterian
Cost: 50
Name: ANTH 120 EXAM 2
Description: These notes cover what is going to be on our second exam
Uploaded: 10/16/2018
7 Pages 17 Views 3 Unlocks
Reviews

sqw747 (Rating: )



Key Sites: 


Where were oldowan artifacts excavated?



❖ Laetoli, Tanzania (Australopithecines) 

➢ Came upon a series of human footprints

➢ Wet climate

➢ Found two footprints next to each other which suggest a social bond ❖ Taung, South Africa (Australopithecines) 

➢ Found bone deposits

➢ Hominins mixed in with other animals

➢ No stone tools

➢ Instead they were using bones and teeth as weapons

■ Osteodontokeratic Industry

● Bone and teeth as tools

❖ CK, Brain Cave Taphonomy (Australopithecines) 

➢ “The Hunters of the Haunted”

■ A term used to describe that the Australopithecines were being hunted instead of doing the hunting




➢ Cranials showed two perforations that matched exactly the canine teeth of leopards

➢ Leopards will take their prey into trees they do this by the head

❖ Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania (Australopithecines) If you want to learn more check out The origins of rome are explained using what?

➢ Oldowan tools were named after this

➢ Tools made by knocking the sides off and creating a sharp edge

➢ Conchoidal shape

❖ East Turkana, Kenya (Australopithecines) We also discuss several other topics like How are reliability and validity related?

➢ Oldowan Artifacts

➢ Hominin Species associated

❖ DK, Bed I, Olduvai Gorge (Homo-habilis) 

➢ Plotted occurrences of stone tools

➢ One of the first sites that had both stone tools and bones from savanna animals ➢ Bones looked like they had been fractured over




❖ Kobi Fora Don't forget about the age old question of What is the difference between lagging and leading strands?

➢ Possible evidence for controlled use of fire

■ Baked sediments

❖ FLK I ZInj 

➢ Had pieces of Australopithecus at the front

➢ Animal bones including gazelle, pig, giraffe, fish, and small bones

❖ Olorgesailie, Kenya 

➢ Site contained many hand axes

➢ Thought the site was used as a campsite where they would make the handaxes and come back

❖ Zhoukoudian, China 

➢ Site was a cave in a mountain called “Dragon Bone Hill”

■ Name came from the people would get the dragon bones to grind up and use as medicine

➢ Locally used as a source of fossils If you want to learn more check out What are the similar characteristics of the earth’s moon and mercury?

➢ Included thousands of tools, animal bones, hearths, and adaptations to temperate woodland environment

➢ Began to find human remains of the entire populations

❖ Dmansi, Georgia(Neanderthals) 

➢ Fossils of great antiquity surprised archaeologist excavating the medieval georgian

➢ several fossils from medieval georgian village include a full set of erectus teeth found below a saber tooth cat

➢ Also included animals that have moved up from Africa and human bones ❖ Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain 

➢ Bones from level six demonstrate a human presence in Spain at least 800,000 years ago

➢ Nearly a hundred hominid fossils and twice as many stone tools were collected in 1994 and 1995 excavation seasons If you want to learn more check out How does magma move?

❖ Steinhein, Germany 

➢ Found archaic homo sapiens or H. Heidelbergensis

■ A possible ancestor to the neanderthals

❖ La Chapple - aux- Saints, France 

➢ Found remains buried in a grave

➢ First evidence that Neanderthals buried their dead

➢ “Neanderthal Stage”

■ Hunched over, dumb

■ Not the human form of us

➢ First piece of evidence of wooly mammoth burial grounds

➢ Knees flexed up underneath chin

❖ Moldova I, Ca 

➢ Established along the ice front Don't forget about the age old question of What are the neural networks of sleep?

➢ Structures formed related to animal bones

➢ 90% wooly mammoth

➢ Building houses out of wooly mammoth bones

➢ They were hunting the wooly mammoths

❖ Teshik, Tash 

➢ Remains of a neanderthal child

➢ Horns of mountain goats with cranials still attached were laid around the child for burial

➢ Removed the flesh of the child

❖ La Ferrassie, France 

➢ Found a whole series of features

➢ Two adult burials

➢ Child burials

➢ Low mounds of earth

■ Yellow sand carried into the cave and formed 3x3 mounds

■ Dug a hole in the center for a stillborn child

➢ Young boy buried in a triangular grave

➢ Cranial on one side at the top and bones buried at the bottom

➢ First evidence of lines and circles cut in the rock

❖ Klasies River Mouth Cave, South Africa 

➢ Deep sea cave

➢ Trapped thousands of years worth of deposits

➢ Fire pits were found

➢ High deposits were called “Late Stone Age”

➢ Lower deposits were called “Middle Stone Age” also known as Mousterian ➢ Hominins were found in the middle stone age

➢ Raised questions about how modern humans and neanderthals interacted ■ 1: They were seperated a long time ago

■ 2: Modern humans arrive in local populations and evolved in different places

❖ Cro Magon (1868) 

➢ Site that tells us neanderthals buried their dead

❖ Qafzeh, Israel 

➢ Earliest homosapien found

➢ Contain Mousterian material

➢ Modern humans

➢ Burials found with male and females

❖ Kebara Cave, Israel 

➢ Hosted both modern humans and neanderthals coexisted

➢ Both species came and went to Levant, probably shifting ranges in response to colder and warmer conditions

➢ Culturally indistinguishable

➢ Small populations

➢ Eventually modern humans became the only hominins

Key Terms: 

❖ Dating- Placing a historical event within a chronology of events by analyzing physical clues (chemical, biological, and nuclear) that reflect the processes of artifact deterioration

❖ Chronology- the arrangement of historical events in there order of occurrence ❖ Stratigraphy- Superimosted sediment deposits

❖ Law of Superposition- Underlying strata are older than those occurring above them in an undisturbed archaeological sequence

❖ Law of Association- Artifacts and features (statically) occurring together were (dynamically) deposited together

❖ Chronometric (Absolute) Dating-Assigning a specific date to an event and specifying exactly how much time has passed since the date occurred. These dates are often calendar years such as “12,000 years ago”

❖ Relative Dating- Assigning dates to artifacts and archaeological deposits without specifying an exact calendar year.

❖ Radiocarbon (C14) Dating- a method of obtaining age estimates from organic materials by measuring the decay rate of the radioactive carbon isotope to stable carbon ❖ Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) Dating- Radiocarbon dating technique that counts C14 atoms directly, rather than measuring the decay rate of radioactive carbon ❖ Dendrochronology- The science that estimates precise chronometric dates by counting tree rings

❖ Thermoluminescence- Used to date rocks, mineral, and pottery.

❖ Potassium- Argon Dating- Measures the accumulation of argon in a mineral from the decomposition of potassium.

❖ Archaeomagnetic Dating- Compares buried features (well-baked clay floors, ovens, kilns, iron smelting furnaces) to know fluctuations in the earth’s magnetic field ❖ Fission Track Dating- Determines the thermal ae of artifacts containing uranium bearing minerals.

❖ Electron Spin Resonance- Used to date minerals such as quartz, fossilized teeth, flint, and calcium carbonate in limestone, coral, and egg shells.

❖ Rate of Accumulation- Uses stratigraphic relationships to determine the relative ages of artifacts based on Law of Superposition

❖ Cross-Dating- A technique used to compare consistencies in stratigraphic deposits between parts of a site or between sites in a region

❖ Obsidian Hydration- Estimates dates by measuring the thickness of the hydration layer on obsidian artifacts.

❖ Zooarchaeology- the study of animal bones to address archaeological problems and questions

❖ Faunal Assemblage- a collection of animal bones recovered from an archaeological site ❖ Seasonality- the study of the seasons in which sites were occupied. Can be accomplished by examining animal bones such as horns and antlers and age related tissue development

❖ Taphonomy- the science of the laws of embedding, or the study of the post- depositional processes that affect bones from the time of animal’s death through to recovery by archaeological excavation.

❖ Domestication- establishing human control over the genetic composition, movement, and reproduction of animals; recognized by

➢ morphological and behavioral changes

➢ Changes in animal stature

➢ Sex ratios

➢ Age profiles

❖ Blade Technology( Modern Humans) 

➢ Middle Paleolithic = Mousterian

➢ Upper Paleolithic = Modern Humans

■ New kinds of tools

● Wood

● Bone and antler

● Spears

■ Aesthetic culture

● Carve pictures into rocks

■ Blade technology became more refined

■ New tools and technology

■ Make more blades from flakes

■ More flexibility

■ Extend this technology with better materials

❖ Chatelperronian blade technology 

➢ Thin blades

➢ First identified at the chatelperronian site

➢ Few “diagnostic tools” that do not occur anywhere else

➢ Bone tools

■ No obvious uses

■ found in Arcy-sur-cure

■ Mammoth bones

● Tusk cranials

■ Bone houses

❖ Aurignacian blade technology 

➢ No chatelperronian knives

➢ A lot of bone tools

➢ Same technology, but different styles

➢ Lots of jewelry made out of bones and shells

➢ Both chatelperronian made out of bones and shells

➢ Both chatelperronian and aurignacian

➢ Had to have been there at the same time

❖ Gravettian blade technology 

➢ No bone tools

➢ Diagnostic forms

➢ Hafted spears

➢ Composite tools made from different materials

➢ Both Aurignacian and gravettian made spear points but they were different ❖ Solutrean blade technology 

➢ Flint Mapping

■ How the ancestors made tools from the rocks

➢ Thin and delicate

➢ Stone tools used to represent power

■ Never used

➢ Culture reflected on materials

➢ Found in a more restricted area

➢ Came after the last glacial maximum

❖ Magdalenian blade technology 

➢ Stone tools, bone tools

➢ Small tools to put on top of of handles to create spears

➢ Ultimate flexibility

➢ Change the form of the handle

➢ Composite tools

■ Lots of pieces that change forms

Important Things to Know: 

❖ Oldowan Site Types: 

➢ Home Bases

➢ Kill/ Butchery Sites

➢ Tool and Manufacturing & Quarries

➢ Temporary Camps

❖ Homo Habilis 

➢ Means hand bones

➢ Different appearance compared to other Australopithecines

➢ More sophisticated use of stone tools

❖ Homo Erectus 

➢ More advanced version of the H. Habilis

➢ From the neck down looks like us

➢ Fully bipedal

➢ Different sized cranial

❖ Acheulean Industry 

➢ Hand ax find by John Frere

➢ He was the first to propose in print that prehistoric people produced such artifacts ➢ Hand axes were used for an array of things

❖ Peyrony excavated at Le Moustier 

➢ Start of cultural findings

➢ Found a human cranial

➢ Neanderthal bones

➢ Layers of human produced stone tools (76) levels

➢ Later called neanderthal culture “ Mousterian culture”

❖ Francois Bordes 

➢ “Handbook of Paleolithic Typology”

■ Studied how stone tools were made

■ Described 62 different kinds of tools

■ Began to notice patterns

■ Said that there was no sequence to the layers

■ Came to the conclusion that they must be from different cultures ■ Both lived on the same landscape

❖ Louis and Sally Benford 

➢ When studying these same stone tools, they came to the conclusion that they used the stone tools for different things

➢ uStone tools were all under one technology

❖ Ferrassie Mousterian 

➢ Dominated by scrapers on levallois flakes

■ Levallois point

■ Levallois blade

■ Levallois technique

● Produced flat flakes repeatedly

● Then used to make tools

❖ Quina Mousterian 

➢ Dominated by quina scrapers steep retouch

❖ Denticulate Mousterian 

➢ Dominated by notched tooles called spokehaves

❖ Typical Mousterian 

➢ Contains all 62 types in near equal proportions

❖ Mousterian of Acheulean Tradition 

➢ Contains all 62 types plus Mousterian handaxes

Page Expired
5off
It looks like your free minutes have expired! Lucky for you we have all the content you need, just sign up here