×
Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to UA - Study Guide - Midterm
Join StudySoup for FREE
Get Full Access to UA - Study Guide - Midterm

Already have an account? Login here
×
Reset your password

UA / Psychology / PSY 480 / What is the separation of power?

What is the separation of power?

What is the separation of power?

Description

School: University of Arizona
Department: Psychology
Course: Forensic Psychology
Professor: Judith becker
Term: Spring 2019
Tags: Forensic Psychology, exam, interrogations, Confessions, and legalsystem
Cost: 50
Name: Forensic Psychology Exam #1 Study Guide
Description: This study guide covers topics from Chapters 1, 2, and 3 (the legal system and its interaction with psychology, false confessions and potential solutions and interrogation techniques).
Uploaded: 02/04/2019
7 Pages 36 Views 2 Unlocks
Reviews

dio573739411 (Rating: )


Davinah Gradillas (Rating: )



Key:  important definitions key concepts 


What is the separation of power?



Legal System:

­ Seperation of power:

­ Legislation: makes laws

­ Executive: administrative regulations and law enforcement

­ Judicial: reviews and interprets legislative and executive statutes for  constitutionality; settles disputes; sets expectations for future punishments for  breaking the law

­ Burden of proof: 

­ The standard needed to reach to prove a fact is legally established 

­ Discussed in the context of the verdict

­ Not well defined

­ Examples with percent effectiveness:

­ Beyond a reasonable doubt — 99.9%

­ Presumption of innocence

­ Clear and convincing evidence (often used in civil cases)


What is the meaning of burden of proof?



­ Preponderance of the evidence — 50% (often used in civil cases)

­ Probable cause

­ Reasonable suspicion

­ Federal Courts: Don't forget about the age old question of What is urbanization in asia?
Don't forget about the age old question of What is the difference between competitive and noncompetitive inhibitors?

­ Trial courts: hears cases for the first time (where facts are established) ­ Appellate courts: reviews cases from district trial courts

­ Cases are not always appealed

­ Typically no new evidence or witnesses emerge

­ Limited arguments are made

­ Reversible errors can be appealed

­ Can lead to new trial, will reconsider evidence sometimes

­ Supreme court: reviews selected cases from appellate courts (very small  percentage ever get to this court)


What are the appellate courts?



­ Higher courts are binding to lower courts

­ Discretionary review

­ Writ of cert: the reviewing process for getting a case looked at by the  supreme court

­ If 4 judges decide to take a case it moves through

­ Used typically with federal laws or split decisions in circuit courts

­ Holding and reasoning: the majority opinion and the court’s reasoning for  it (binds lower courts)

­ Concurrence: some judges agree with the holding but not the reasoning  behind it

­ Dissent: disagreeance with holding

­ Circuit courts: have some persuasive authority over other circuit courts but isn’t  binding We also discuss several other topics like How did settler colonialism differ from other forms of colonialism?

­ Sequence of a criminal trial:

­ Roles:

­ Judge: the “referee” in the courtroom; deals with sentencing and 

guilty/innocent verdicts

­ Jury: listens to evidence and makes guilty/innocent verdict 

­ Bench v. jury trial: 

­ Bench trial: no jury is present (judge decides verdict and 

sentencing)

­ Jury trial: judge manages courtroom and decides sentencing; jury 

makes verdict Don't forget about the age old question of What are the two ways non­vascular plants reproduce asexually?
If you want to learn more check out What is bivalvia?

Psychology and the Law: A Cautious Alliance

­ Illusions with Psych and the Law:

­ Perceptions: people can see the same thing differently and some are better  perceivers than others

­ Linked to witness testimony

­ Suggestibility:  

­ Hypnotism: people may remember things they never actually saw or did ­ Linked to witness testimony

­ Facial expressions and Psychological states:

­ Linked to lie detection

­ Crime prevention:

­ Socio­cultural environment causes crime

­ Environment shapes behavior

­ Punitive justice should be decreased

­ People may be born with predispositions towards criminality

­ Culture Clash: 

­ Law:

­ Prescriptive

­ Regulates

­ Emphasizes the individual

­ Past oriented

­ Adversarial

­ Free will — no external pressures

­ Psychology:

­ Descriptive

­ Explains behavior Don't forget about the age old question of What is the meaning of a true proposition?

­ Emphasizes group characteristics — generalizations

­ Future oriented

­ Advocacy

­ Determinism — there are other factors

­ Differences in goals, methods, and inquiry

­ Goals: 

­ Law: approximation of justice; the individual (more 

comfortable with clinical psychology); high uncertainty 

avoidance

­ Psych: approximation of truth (use of qualifiers — “it 

appears…”); group dynamic; low uncertainty avoidance 

(tolerates lots of ambiguity)

­ Uncertainty avoidance: a culture’s tolerance for uncertainty

and ambiguity

­ Methods: 

­ Law: authority (hierarchical); rulings of the past (look to the

past for advice; “a government of the living by the dead”; 

stare decisis: “let it stand” don’t overturn past rulings)

­ Psych: empiricism (egalitarian); data and the future 

(continuous reexamination and improvement of past 

research)

­ Power distance: the amount of deference and obedience 

given to people in positions of authority

­ Style of Inquiry: 

­ Law: adversarial (interested in justice, not truth — zealous 

representation)

­ Psych: objective (not interested in sides — if we’re wrong, 

we want to be corrected)

­ Why bridge the cultures?

­ Law affects people throughout their lifespan. 

­ Many legal issues are inescapably psychological.

Interrogations and Confessions

­ Power of confessions:

­ Shuts down the trial (the case is over; answer found)

­ Saves time

­ Trials avoided

­ Conviction is almost guaranteed

72% conviction rate with confession

59% without confession

­ Coerced confessions?

­ Low­pressure interrogation: higher voluntary, self­influenced, guilty votes

­ High­pressure interrogation: lower voluntary, self­influenced, guilty votes Even if people can determine a confession was untrue, it is hard to lower  guilty rates

­ When suspect falsely confesses, then pleads not guilty at trial, 81% are found  guilty

­ Fundamental attribution error: 

If they say they did it they must have done it because I would never 

confess 

­ False confessions influence evidence, alibi, witnesses, other suspects Allows for a less thorough investigation

Confirmation bias 

Hard to suppress confessions when “normal” tactics are used

­ Confessions are ruled inadmissible when:

­ Physical force

­ Prolonged isolation (no Miranda waiver)

­ Promise of a lenient sentence

­ Explicit threats

­ food/sleep deprivation

­ Miranda V. Arizona: 

­ If not properly mirandized your confession can be dismissed

­ 80% of people waive their miranda rights

Why?:

­ They see it on TV

­ They believe only guilty people need their Miranda rights

­ Frenzied state of mind at time of waiver

­ Police action:

­ Fast speaking when reading suspect their rights

­ Normalizing the waiver

­ No comprehension check

­ Deemphasizing or lowering their importance

­ Psychological Coercion:

­ Why would an innocent person confess?

Interrogation Techniques:

­ Reid Technique:  

­ 9 steps: 

­ 1. Accusation

­ 2. Excuses

­ 3. Cut­off denial attempts

­ 4. Overcome denials

­ 5. Sincere and understanding (prevents an 

antsy/uncomfortable suspect from leaving the 

interrogation room)

­ 6. Move towards guilt (“but you saw her that night 

right?”)

­ 7. Good reason v. bad reason (“it was either an 

accident or you’re a psychopath”)

­ 8. Elicit full confession

­ 9.  Write out confession

­ 4 techniques: 

­ Conditions:  

­ Loss of control

­ Under police control

­ Sparsely furnished area

­ Direction and pacing of conversation

­ Disorienting (no clocks, windows, 

etc)

­ Makes suspect vulnerable, anxious, 

off­balance

­ Social isolation

­ Interrogation takes place alone

­ No support for social reality

­ Placed in a controlled social reality

­ Style of communication: 

­ Certainty of guilt

­ Direct assumption of guilt

­ Reject all claims of innocence

­ Evidence ploys

­ Minimization of culpability

­ Suggests that everyone will 

understand reasoning

­ Provide ready­made excuses

­ Justification

­ Clear the path to admission of guilt

­ Sympathize

­ Types of False Confessions:

­ Why do people falsely confess?

­ Inexperience

­ Naive 

­ Under the influence

­ Easily dominated

­ Submissive to authority

­ Low intelligence

­ Mentally ill

­ Sleep deprived

­ Terrified

­ Suggestibility and compliance (Gudjonsson)

­ Youth 

­ Impulsive

­ Emotional arousability

­ Poor self­regulation

­ Potential Solutions: 

­ Should interrogators be allowed to lie?

­ In U.S. police are legally allowed to use false evidence ploys

­ In England and Wales it is illegal to lie during interrogations (PACE Act) ­ Witness must be present

­ Interrogations must be audio recorded

­ Intimidation is not allowed

­ Video recording: 

­ Improves police interrogation methods

­ Physical record

­ Is it bad?

­ Can be manipulated 

­ Partial recording (only the confession and not what lead to 

it)

­ Can be used at trial for prosecution (use only footage that 

makes suspect seem guilty and not interrogation tactics)

­ Camera angles can make appeals to either side

­ Limit time of interrogation (4 hours or less) 

­ Witnesses 

­ Adult witness present for interrogation of juveniles and vulnerable  suspects

­ Problems? 

­ Parents may negatively influence their child during interrogation  (they are also stressed)

­ Random witness will do little because normal adults falsely  confess too

­ Attorney is needed during interrogation for all suspects

Page Expired
5off
It looks like your free minutes have expired! Lucky for you we have all the content you need, just sign up here