New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Contemporary Moral Problems Exam 1 Study Guide

by: Jada Notetaker

Contemporary Moral Problems Exam 1 Study Guide PHIL 3720

Marketplace > Georgia State University > PHIL-Philosophy > PHIL 3720 > Contemporary Moral Problems Exam 1 Study Guide
Jada Notetaker
GPA 3.88

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

PHIL 3720's complete study guide with answers.
Contemporary Moral Problems
Ms. Elizabeth Dwyer
Study Guide
Contemporary Moral Problems, PHIL 3720, Ms. Elizabeth Dwyer, Ms. Dwyer
50 ?




Popular in Contemporary Moral Problems

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy

This 2 page Study Guide was uploaded by Jada Notetaker on Sunday February 28, 2016. The Study Guide belongs to PHIL 3720 at Georgia State University taught by Ms. Elizabeth Dwyer in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 54 views. For similar materials see Contemporary Moral Problems in PHIL-Philosophy at Georgia State University.


Reviews for Contemporary Moral Problems Exam 1 Study Guide


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 02/28/16
PHIL 3720 Exam 1 Study Guide  [The exam will consist of one essay question (prompt TBD by the instructor). Completing the  essay will require you to be able to answer the following questions.] 1. What is an argument? What are the parts of an argument? An argument is any attempt to convince others that some belief is true. Premises (the  statements that support your conclusion) and a conclusion (the point the argument is  trying to convince others of). 2. How do we determine whether an argument is a good (or bad) argument?  If the conclusion follows logically from the premises, it’s valid. If it remains true when  mapped onto what is already known about the world, it is sound. This is proper form.  Also, persuasiveness is a mark of a good argument. If the argument fails either of these, it’s invalid, unsound, or both. 3. What distinguishes ethical (moral) problems from other philosophical problems?  Moral problems ask how one should act insofar as it affects themselves and others, while  other philosophical problems concern other subjects (such as existence). 4. What is an ethical theory? What does an ethical theory attempt to provide?  An ethical theory is a tool for determining if an action is “good” or not. They’re an  attempt at giving morality a standard. 5. What is the criterion for Utilitarianism? For Kantian Ethics?  Utilitarianism: Produce the most happiness for the most people with the least amount of  suffering possible. Kantian Ethics: Insofar as someone is rational, their rights must be respected and they  must be treated as ends in themselves (never merely as means to your ends). 6. Explain Peter Singer’s argument for providing famine (global poverty) relief.  Which ethical theory does Singer apply in his argument? Singer believes that one should donate to famine relief as much as possible without  sacrificing anything of “comparable moral importance,” since most people agree that  dying of hunger and poor sanitation is bad, and citizens of affluent countries are in a  position to help. Also, the distance between you and the affected country doesn’t matter.  This falls under utilitarianism. 7. Explain Christopher Wellman’s argument for providing famine (global poverty)  relief. Which ethical theory does Wellman apply in his argument? Wellman says we have both positive and negative duties toward one another, specifically  when it comes to famine relief. According to him, “negative duties prohibit us from  harming others, and positive duties require us to assist others when they are gravely  imperiled and we can rescue them at no unreasonable cost to ourselves” (Wellman 428).  These duties are characteristic of Kant’s duty ethics. 8. What are some objections to Singer’s and Wellman’s arguments? Can the authors  address or overcome these objections? Why or why not?  Singer “In the drowning child example, you were the only person available to prevent the kid  from drowning. In the real world, there’s millions of other people at least who can help.” Singer: “Just because other people can help doesn’t lessen the individual responsibilities  we all have.” “If everyone donated $5 to relieving world hunger, the problem would be solved.  Therefore, I don’t have to give more than $5.” Singer: “This only works hypothetically. You and I both know everyone isn’t going to  donate $5, so it doesn’t follow that you should abide by that in reality.” Wellman “But poor countries are so far away.” Wellman: “Distance doesn’t matter. The Internet’s capable of connecting people from the most remote places together.” “What if I just don’t want to?” Wellman: “Considering how easy it is to donate from your phone (the very least you  could do), there’s no excuse not to. It’s still up to you, though.”


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

50 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Jennifer McGill UCSF Med School

"Selling my MCAT study guides and notes has been a great source of side revenue while I'm in school. Some months I'm making over $500! Plus, it makes me happy knowing that I'm helping future med students with their MCAT."

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.