PoliSci Notes/Study Guide
PoliSci Notes/Study Guide Political Science 141
Popular in American Government and Politics
Popular in Political Science
This 11 page Study Guide was uploaded by Brittany Notetaker on Monday February 29, 2016. The Study Guide belongs to Political Science 141 at University of Wisconsin - Whitewater taught by Eric Loepp in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 102 views. For similar materials see American Government and Politics in Political Science at University of Wisconsin - Whitewater.
Reviews for PoliSci Notes/Study Guide
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 02/29/16
Political Science 14104 Eric Loepp Chapter one Justice seems easy in abstract yet difficult in the particular. Key questions: How should limited resources be allocated and who bears the burden of providing those resources. Government is a set of institutions and procedures that rule a land and its people. Government can be very simple such as a student government or complex such as the US national system. Why have a government? To avoid anarchy. Government is essential because there is no way to enforce rules. Need some basic form of government or there will be chaos. ”If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” Madison no one person is perfect. THis is realistic due to the fact that everyone will put oneself before others. Goals of the government: Goal one: Provide order ensure some sort of order. Founders were VERY concerned about factions or a group of people with a common interest and coming together to dominate all the others. Ultimate goal is to prevent any one faction from gaining power. Goal two: Promote General Welfare. There are things that affect the country as a whole but not necessarily any given individual citizen. People DO NOT like to sacrifice for the common good. What is politics? Politics refers to the conflicts and struggles over the leadership, structure, and policies of government. Major themes: Politics is about conflict. Political process matters. Process is a set of rules that impacts an outcome. Politics is a persuasive strategic game. Conflict: Politics is often a zerosum game in which one group’s gain is another group’s loss. Chapter Two Key Questions: What motivated the founders to make the decisions they did? We split from Britain because of the lack of representation, high taxes, and religion. Colonists displeased with Britain meddling in affairs and taxation without representation. There was a growing antibritish feeling. More and more groups from in opposition to British rule. In 1776, we formally declare independance and a declaration of war. We win now what? The Articles of Confederation lay out their first national government and loosely held the 13 states together. It failed due to the lack of national government and given to much power to the states. We feared centralized power. Congress could not tax and there was no president. Shays Rebellion 1787. Daniel Shay leads a group of farmers in rebellions against the state of Massachusetts to prevent foreclosures on their land. Shay’s rebellion shows that the federal government had no power and shined a light on the problems with the government. Constitutional conventions begins in May 1787 each state sent representatives to Philadelphia. Original ideas was to “fix” the Articles of Confederation. The group decided the Articles of Confederation had too much wrong and a new government began. James Madison are all people good or bad? Madison were wary that people would go against what the government would say. Major issues to tackle 1. How much power should the national government get relative to the states. 2. What is the “right amount” of democracy? 3. What could be done about slavery? Most difficult issues during the convention Declaration of Independence said all men are created equal Selling Constitution to America Movement to get constitution ratified and pass it. Should we support a new system in which a great deal more power is granted to a central government? Those in favor were called Federalists. Those not in favor were the AntiFederalists. The Federalist Papers: Papers written to advocate the ratification of the proposed constitution. 85 essays were penned (anonymously) by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay AntiFederalists also published a series of papers criticizing the proposed Constitution. A big problem were factions. Big challenge: How do you keep a majority from oppressing a minority. How do you control mischiefs of a faction? We do not have a pure democracy!! We have a republic which means that the masses elect a subset of people who are in charge of making and enforcing laws. We delegate power to a select group of individuals and they look out for us in law and policy. Pluralism: the more factions you have the more they offset each other and no individual group grows too big or too powerful. Small vs. Large States The Great Compromise: How do you staff congress. Legislator has two chambers based upon population. Bicameral legislature: a lower chamber where representation is based on population and an upper chamber where all states are represented equally. This is precisely what we got and still have today. There are more balancing!!! Such as, National power deals with coinage,treaties with other countries, trade, and war. While state deals with taxes, infrastructure, and education. Reserved Powers: if the Constitution does not give a particular power to the federal government that power therefore belongs to the state. Federalist Paper 51 Part one: A faction is a small, organized, dissenting group within a larger one and we can cure factions’ mischiefs by removing the cause of factions however this would lead to giving everyone the same opinion or destroying liberty. Part two: A faction is a small, organized, dissenting group within a larger one and we can cure factions’ mischiefs by trying to control them however this would lead to minorities and majorities and majorities would override any minority faction while majorities can be dealt with by preventing majorities from forming and prevent majorities from oppressing others so what we truly need is a REPUBLIC. Supremacy clause This clause proclaims that all laws passed by the national government supersede any laws passed by the state government. A state must execute a federal law just as would execute a state law. Slavery The Constitution does not really talk about slavery. There was no logical way to handle slavery. Southern states wanted them counted as part of the state's population because it would boost representation; Northern states did not. John Adams was the only founding father who do not own slaves. The “solution” is to count slaves as threefifths of a person for the purposes of representation. Have to reach a middle ground. Slaves have no voting rights. That's all the constitution says about slavery. The founders knew that slavery was a hypocrisy but they were constrained. The south would not have been a part if there was nothing written towards slavery. Federalists Centralized government Pro constitution Wealthy elite Elites run the show Antifederalist State control Wary of constitution Farmers, blue collar Common man representation The bill of rights were given so the AntiFederalists to agree to support the constitution. Bill of rights to give individuals say. Three major differences 1. Representation: AntiFederalists wanted more representatives and greater representation of various interests. 2. Threats of majority: AntiFederalists worried about aristocracy in itself; federalists worried that a majority of the people would suppress the minority. 3. Governmental power: Federalists wanted a more centralized government while Anti Federalists wanted more local control. What do we get Constitution is short with seven different articles the first three deal with the main government. The legislature Representatives 435 serve two years Senators 100 six years. Representatives seats are up for election at the same time but only one third of the Senate is ever up for election. Bicameral or two chambers Key Goal: was balancing accountability with reasoned public policy. Federalism and Separation of Power Key concept: How does governmental power work? Power determines who gets to make policy. Federalism refers to a diversion of power between multiple governments. Example: Chancellor, College Letters and Sciences, Political Science department. National and state government have certain powers reserved only to them. However, they share concurrent power in other stresses. Examples: police authority and taxes. Privileges and immunities States have to treat citizens of other states as they would their own. Promotes travel and economic activity asking states. However, there are exceptions. Full faith and credit (FFC) Every state has to respect each other's laws just as they have to respect the national government’s laws. ⅔ Notes: We can loosely divide the history of federalism into two general periods and several specific forms. 1. Dual feudalism (17891937) 2. Cooperative federalism (19371960s) Fiscal federalism Coercive federalism New federalism Federalists/ AntiFederalisits still fight over proper scope of national vs. State power. National Supremacy is established McCulloch vs. Maryland: (1819) SCOTUS affirms national Supremacy and Congress implied/enumerated powers. The federal government does not want to tax a federal bank. State cannot tax the federal government. Shook the government to show the national Supremacy! Dual federalism: The idea of multiple government ruling on their own. The state and national governments work in largely separate jurisdictional spheres. Not much interaction with each other. different levels of government yet kept separate. Barron v. Baltimore: (1833) distinguishes federal vs. state. The bill of rights only applies to the federal government, not the state. Only protection from the federal government. The Supreme Court plays a major role in shaping the nature of federalism. The interpretation of the commerce clause which says Congress can regulate amoung other things trade between stated. The commerce clause was vague and began to have different meanings. Similarly, the New Deal (1930s) relied heavily on the national government becomes more involved in activities historically under the states. Federal government supported stares through subsides or grantsinaid (basically bribes) Federal and state governments enjoyed “supportive relations” and even partnerships. Analogy The “marble” (cooperate) cake reflects different levels of government working together. The “layer” (dual) cake means that the state and national governments are separate. Work within own policy areas. Agriculture people would not work with education people. Fiscal federalism is when the feds funnel money down to the states. Key idea is that there are always strings attached Grantsinaid: A grant is federal money that is given to the states to support local projects and goals. Grants come in many shapes and forms, and each have different rules and requirements governing their use. Categorical grants: Money that is earned by Congress to go to states to states for use in specific areas. Congress gives states x number of dollars to use in y policy area. Block grants: money is given to use in a specific policy area but the state decides precisely how that money is used. State has MORE authority over how it is spent. Project grant:, Money for which states compete via proposals to federal agencies. Formula grants: Money is given based on a formula example x dollars spend on food stamps. ⅖ Federal over time Cooperative federalism era saw pretty friendly and supportive relationships between the states and the federal government. Federal government is playing a larger role in public life. Coercive federalism is when states are forced to comply with federal requirements in order to receive money. Unfunded mandates are programs or standards imposed on states by the federal government that do not come with money. Example: Wheelchair accessible buildings. 1984: Drinking age became tied to state highway funding and if the states did not comply they did not get funding. Justice Rehnquist: “Congress can offer relatively mild encouragement to the states to enact higher minimum drinking ages than they would otherwise choose.” No Child left behind Act (NCLB) requires states to comply with federal testing standards in order to keep receiving federal money for education. Civil Liberties Civil Liberties: Refer to protections that citizen have FROM certain actions by the government. o This is what the government must do Rights refer to obligations imposed on the government to guarantee that all citizens are protected equally Civil liberties come in conflict with the greater good Example: Yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. We have to set some limits. However in Court they tend to lead towards the First Amendment. o The First ten Amendments to the Constitution comprise the Bill of Rights and contains phrases such as and shalt not. Technically the Bill of Rights are in reality liberties. o We could amend the constitution. It won’t happen but we can. First Amendment: Freedom of religion in the establishment clause creates the wall between church and state. The government cannot establish a national church but it’s not easy. People disagree about the wall such as should be religious symbols be displayed in public schools. o The government cannot infringe on a person’s right to worship or not worship ( free exercise clause) o You cannot use fighting words that instigate violence or damaging conduct. o Freedom of the Press: the press enjoys much of the same freedom of speech as the public. Libel and slander refer to malicious and untrue written and oral statements but are hard to prove. Second Amendment: The right to bear arms. o Established the rights of an individual to own firearms in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). The 2nd amendment states that one can have a firearm unrelated to possessing it for a milita. McDonald v. Chicago (2010) again rules the states cannot prohibit people from owning guns in their homes for the purpose of self defense. The second Amendment is mostly a STATE issue. Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment: Rights for those criminally accused. o Due Process: Guarantee that individuals receive all rights to which they are entitled. Violating due process can get the case thrown out even if the defendant is clearly guilty. o Miranda v. Arizona (1966) SCOTUS rules that any person placed under arrest must be informed of their legal rights. o Why can the TSA go through my stuff despite me committing no crime? 4th Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches of their property however it comes down to privacy v. public safety Exclusionary rule: Evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in a criminal trial. There is a good faith exception if the authorities believed the search was legal. 5th Amendment citizens have a right to a grand jury, which is called to determine if a trial is warranted or not. Double jeopardy: A person cannot be tried for the same crime twice. Self incrimination: gives people the right to not incriminate oneself. “I plead the fifth” Eminent domain is the power of the government to take private property from citizens for public use. 6th Amendment: The right to counsel… Defenders have a right to a “speedy” trial, impartial jury, and a lawyer. o Public defenders are lawyers who are assigned to defendants who cannot afford their own attorneys. 8th Amendment: Protection of criminal defendants from excessive force by the government. Week Five Civil Rights Civil Rights are claims that citizens are entitled to make on the government. o Rights ARE NOT Liberties General rule: Civil rights narrow at the beginning but evolved slowly. Civil war jump started several key amendments (Reconstruction Amendments) 13,14,15 o Equal protection (14), Abolishes Slavery (15), and government cannot discriminate (15) Equal protection refers to the idea that everyone must be equal under the law. Brown v. Board of Education Roe v. Wade Bush v. Gore Obergefell v. Hodges Voting: the constitution did not include a provision declaring the right for all citizens. Therefore it used to be only a small percentage of people. Now in order to vote you must be a citizen, registered, and 18. Women’s Suffrage: denied equal rights under the rationale that they needed to be protected by men (protectionism) how we thought culturally. “Men is or should be woman's protector and defender.” (Justice Bradley 1873) 1918 most states allowed women to vote but had no federal protection. 1919 the 19th amendment guaranteed women the right to vote in federal elections. o This was 50 years after the civil war and the 14th amendment. Women still faced/face discrimination in education o Title IX (nine) of the 1972 education act explicitly forbids gender discrimination in education. The Equal Rights Amendment was an amendment floated around in the 1970s Poll tax is a specific amount one had to pay (usually a ridiculous amount) in order to vote o Voting rights Act in 1965 took over a century for voting rights for blacks to be fully legalized. Got around the 15th Amendment by putting up barriers such as literacy tests and poll taxes. o Laws to outlaw segregation and provide equal opportunity were passed but unenforceable. o Southern States passed Jim Crow laws that institutionalized racial segregation. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) SCOTUS rules that segregation is legal as long as blacks and whites enjoy equal facilities. (Separate but equal). Court ruled that the 14th amendment was not intended to remove all distinctions based on color. NOT EQUAL. o Brown v. Board of Education (1954) SCOTUS views the 14th Amendment in terms of consequences of segregation, which were clearly not equal, Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned. Court rules that states could no longer discriminate on the basis of race in any law making way and the federal government would from this point on intervene against discriminatory practices in states. This did not end discrimination o Dejure is outlawed but de facto is what is in effect. It would take a proactive movement on the part of legislators to work towards “equal protection” in practice Review Questions 1) Which of the following best explains why the first crack at a national government would end up a pretty miserable failure? a. The executive was not given sufficient power to act in a time of national crisis b. It did not include protections for freedom of speech c. The Founders overcorrected for their fear of centralized power d. Too many provisions were legally ambiguous, leading to chaos 2) Why did the Founders opt for a republican system over a direct democracy? a. A large majority of Americans at the time were uneducated, and therefore simply did not know enough about politics to participate effectively b. They worried people would make impulsive decisions if given direct power to make policy themselves c. They were concerned a manipulative minority of political elites would (effectively) brainwash the masses into voting against their own interests d. The Founders were well aware that no direct democracy had ever worked before for longer than a few years 3) The Great Compromise can still be seen today when we look at __________. a. The structure of Congress b. Race relations c. State vs. national power d. Judicial review 1) The best way to characterize the evolution of federalism in the U.S. would be to say that… a. The early days saw considerable cooperation between state and federal government but over time the federal government has grown increasingly dominant b. State and federal governments worked together closely until the midtwentieth century when a series of SCOTUS rulings gave the states more power than the federal government via selective incorporation c. Initially the federal government focused on foreign affairs and states dealt with domestic issues, but globalization in the twentieth century has seen the federal government exercise it’s national supremacy more frequently than in the past d. Early on the state and local governments worked largely within their own spheres, but then they began to work together, with the federal government first incentivizing and later demanding compliance with federal policy 2) Due to the __________ clause of the Constitution, Wisconsin can make my dad, visiting from Oregon, pay more for a fishing license than they demand of me for the exact same license. a. Equal protection b. Privileges and immunities c. Full faith and credit d. Due process 3) Which Supreme Court case was most instrumental in affirming dual federalism for roughly the first half of American history? a. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) b. Cohens v. Virginia (1821) c. Barron v. Baltimore (1833) d. South Dakota v. Dole (1987) 1) If these four different people were to all claim a Fourth Amendment violation, which of them would have the strongest legal case? a. Sarah, who works for a private company that required a drug test as a condition of employment b. Kyle, who was unhappy that his school principal allowed police to search his locker c. Jeff, who learned that the government had been tracking his credit card purchases d. Kendall, who is upset that her purse was searched as she entered Lambeau Field for a Packers game 2) Which of the following cases would does the government have the strongest case for prior restraint? a. A reporter in Iraq discovers that the U.S. plans a secret raid against Iranian nuclear facilities a few days before the mission is scheduled b. The Los Angeles Times discovers that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a drug in part, it appears, because of political pressure from a powerful member of Congress c. The Tampa Bay Times plans to run an oped right before the midterm elections criticizing the Obama Administration for not doing enough to clean up after the BP oil spill d. A radical rightwing newspaper repeatedly publishes antiObama rhetoric, often including hate speech 3) Which of the following questions best examples the challenge posed by the establishment clause? a. Can a religious group sacrifice animals in the course of worship? b. Can athletes lead a group of players in prayer before a public high school football game? c. Can religious groups hold meetings in public parks? d. Can a citizen avoid being drafted into military service by objecting to war on religious grounds? 1) Imagine that UWWhitewater wanted to increase racial diversity in its student body. Based on the current (February 2016) constitutional status of affirmative action, which of the following practices would most likely be upheld by the court system? 1) UWWhitewater may switch to a process where all new applicants are scored on a 100point scale and nonwhite students get 15 points automatically 2) UWWhitewater may reserve between 8% and 12% of new admissions for racial minorities 3) An applicant’s race may be considered but a quota system may not be used 4) Race cannot be considered under any circumstances 2) Just as __________ overturned Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), __________ overturned Bowers v. Hardwick (1986). 1) Brown v. Board of Education (1954); United States v. Windsor (2013) 2) Gratz v. Bollinger (2003); Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) 3) Brown v. Board of Education (1954); Lawrence v. Texas (2003) 4) Roe v. Wade; Fisher v. University of Texas (2015) 3) If you asked a critic of laws that would require voters to show an ID in order to cast a ballot, what would he be most likely to say? e 2) Republican turnout might increase, potentially hurting minorities’ interests. 3) Voter fraud might increase. 4) These policies infringe on minorities’ civil liberties. Unit two Public opinion: how do people feel about politicians and political issues of the day. There are two types of opinions Individual opinion and Aggregate opinion. Individual opinion concerns what particular citizens think of politics. Aggregate opinion concerns what the general public and their view. Public is never ever of one mind. Early on, it appeared people did not know much at all. People were inconsistent/ unstable in their opinions. Did not know much about politics at all. “People are stupid.” There are two forms of opinions one can create. Preformed opinion is like ideology and other core beliefs. An example of this would be are you a coke or Pepsi person. Latent opinions are opinions just below the surface formed on the spot. Key: We have generalized opinions and beliefs (like ideology) but most of our daytoday (latent) opinions are generated on the spot. We tend to draw only an immediate salient considerations when rendering political opinions. 2/29 Happy Leap Day!! Initial reactions supporting tougher gun control were just thatinitial they eventually wore off (in an aggregate sense). By November 2013, support for gun control returned to pre Newtown levels. Public opinion usually work back down after spikes due to events Where do political opinions come from? o Political Socialization: We are socialized into politics, just like we are in other aspects of life. Our life experience,families,friends,and environment shape our political views. The single best piece of information for guessing a person’s political party affiliation is your parents. Education: Schools often require civics courses. Context/Events: Where and how we live our lives means we are exposed to different things that affect our political views.
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'