×
Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to AU - HIST 1010 - Class Notes - Week 4
Join StudySoup for FREE
Get Full Access to AU - HIST 1010 - Class Notes - Week 4

Already have an account? Login here
×
Reset your password

AU / History / HIST 1010 / What is pax decorum?

What is pax decorum?

What is pax decorum?

Description

School: Auburn University
Department: History
Course: World History I
Professor: Donna bohanan
Term: Fall 2015
Tags:
Cost: 25
Name: Notes for the week of Sept. 21st
Description: These are very detailed notes for this week. It goes through the Roman Republic, the demise of the Roman Empire all the way into the Rise of Christianity. Enjoy!
Uploaded: 09/28/2015
11 Pages 16 Views 17 Unlocks
Reviews

Ben (Rating: )


Will craven (Rating: )


John Nowlin (Rating: )

fantastic notes!


Taylor Jordan (Rating: )


Curtis Russell (Rating: )


Osiel Olguin (Rating: )


Ben Collins (Rating: )



Rome: Republic and Empire


What is pax decorum?



Week of September 21, 2015

Roman Roots

I. Etruscans

A. Modern Turkey

B. Metallurgy, art and language

C. Settlements akin to Greek Poleis

II. Magna Graecia  Greek colonialism

III. Cultural interaction developed into some core precepts of Roman society A. Entertainment (gladiatorial combat)

B. Language (Phoenician alphabet)

C. Religion (gods and syncretism like Alexander’s Empire)

D. Government (Democracy *)

Shaping Concepts (need to know)

I. Paterfamilias- family, society and the government embodied in the oldest  male’s authority and direction over an extended family

A. Patron-Client Relationships: subservience and loyalty in exchange for  provision and protection.


What are the punic wars?



Don't forget about the age old question of ∙ What is an open primary?

II. Pietas- devotion to one’s family, state and religion, in that order III. Pax decorum- “the peace of the gods” communal fate depends on  collective solidarity in rituals and practices

IV. mos maiorum- “the way” or “custom” + “of our betters” or “superiors” =  Our traditions

Patriarchy important because in rom ether are extended families who always have a richer male who is the highest in the family (patron familiance). This the beginning  of political blocks. They will grant what you need for loyalty. Family is the more  important thing in roman history. Through communal religion you have peace with  god but family is number one above religion.  

Early Rome and Monarchy 753-509 BCE If you want to learn more check out calculus 1 uh
We also discuss several other topics like What is the definition of consensus?

I. Extended families formed early political blocs in early roman city-states A. Patricians – (most powerful paterfamiliases) formed the advisory  committee to the king called the Senatus.


What happened during the revolt of gracchi?



B. Plebeians – these were non-aristocratic citizens that were not  necessarily poor.

II. Early kings were probably Etruscan

A. Patricians felt kingship was tyrannical and ousted the monarchy to  form the Republic

III. The Aeneid and Romulus and Remus

The Republic

The struggle of the Orders (509-287 BCE)

I. Senate and Consuls

A. Two consuls are the most powerful executives; possess Imperium (the  right to start war)If you want to learn more check out julie marcil uottawa

B. Senate are all patricians and elect new consuls from their ranks  annually  

II. Patricians vs Plebeians

A. Expansion meant more wealth for the elements of both groups B. Plebs still do not have a political voice; limits opportunities to favor  Patricians

III. Plebian demands and Secessio (military strike)

A. Poor : redistribution of lands and legal/financial security  

B. Wealthy: right to hold office, not necessarily Senate. Also, trade  interests and representation in military

Senate ruled through consoles for a while and started going through territories.  Plebs started demanding things and started saying “we want land and legal  security” to senators. Most plebs made money through trade and many became  very wealthy. The roman military had lots of plebian members but Rome couldn’t  afford to be short on soldiers and plebs said they wouldn’t fight unless they got  what they wanted.  

Plebian Assembly and Law Codification If you want to learn more check out hrm 360

I. Plebian Assembly (494) and Tribunes (471)

A. Challenge municipal court decisions and retry them

B. Veto certain Senate created laws

C. Can propose legislation to Senate

D. Military offices not previously open to Plebs

II. Twelve Tables (449 BCE): publicly displayed laws; generate greater  transparency

III. Licnian-Sextian Laws (367 BCE): land distribution and mandatory plebian  consulship If you want to learn more check out intro to engineering ttu

IV. Lex Hortensia (287 BCE): Plebian assembly laws are binding on ALL Roman citizens. Wealthy plebs now have comparable power to patricians

Punic Wars

I. First Punic War (264 – 241 BCE)

A. Defensive Imperialism *

B. Roman Victory = constructing its own powerful navy + Carthaginian  politics

II. Second Punic Wars (218-202 BCE)

A. Carthage expands into Spain and conquers Saguntum

B. Hannibal Barca ** (221)- marches 50,000 troops over the Alps in the  winter with elephants to surprise Romans.

C. Consul Fabius Maximus successfully leads defense of Rome

D. Publus Carnelius Scipio Africanus defeats Carthaginians at Zama III. Third Punic War (149-146 BCE): complete destruction of Carthage.  Unnecessary carnage.  

Rome and Carthage go to war because Carthage’s allies bickering. Imperialism was  a factor. Romans win first war, Carthage’s had a stronger navy but Rome built a  navy. Carthage politics forces the hand of many commanders but they messed up

the war. The second Punic war, Carthage lost territory to Rome and Carthage  started expanding into Spain but Rome said don’t pass a line. Rome, in patient client relationship, Spain wanted that protection. Hannibal Barca seized Sangtum .  Barca does the unthinkable and marches troops through Alps in the winter to  surprise the romans. You don’t fight in the winter!! He lost half his troops but he has elephants. He came close to winning. Third war was unnecessary and was to wipe  out the last of threats.

Revolt of Gracchi

I. Tiberias Gracchus (133) & Gaius Gracchus (123/122 BCE) A. Latifundias

B. Agrarian Reform

II. Senatus Consltum Ultimum: emergency senate meeting calling in troops  to violently quell Gracchus followers. Over 3,300 dead.

III. Legacy of Gracchus: people continue to challenge senatorial power and  seek citizens for ALL Italian peoples.

IV. “Bread and Circuses” – used to describe the grain distribution and  entertainment of the following eras as opposed to the “heroism” of the  Republic. Maintains status-quo.

Latifundias is like a southern plantation ran by slave labor of conquered people.  They produce stuff cheap making nutrition rich. There were farmers who could no  longer make it who move to Rome; they left their land but you need land to fight.  The Gracchi brothers run off of a base of popularity. They wanted a piece of all the  conquered stuff. They want to make sure the soldiers got some conquered land and  the government saw this as a threat. The government said see no harm come to the state so consuls had to do what it took to keep everything the same and many died  including the brothers. Many in the middle class threated the ancient power  traditions. At the end of the republic, people were starving; there was a lack of food  and distract starving people through grain distribution and entertainment. After  revolt, things go to normal.  

Military Dictators

I. Gaius Marius

A. Military loyalty (111-103 BCE)

B. Military backing for political power (corruption)

II. Cornelius Sulla (88 BCE)

A. Gains territory of Pontus; Marius tries to take it

B. (88 BCE) Sulla & sic legions march back and clean up Rome

C. 82-81 BCE: Sulla declares himself military dictator & seeks to restore  the power of the Senate. Kills thousands considered a threat to  traditional Senatorial power.  

New military leader changes everything; formerly the military was restricted. Now, if they fight they are promised land and loot. If I win, you win. Loyal to commander  over state. When commanders come back, they usually dissolve army but not

anymore so they start corrupting because the want things and they threaten  because they have a nearby army. Dude with army outside got a rich piece of land  known as Pontus. Marius sneaks back into Rome and tries to do the same failure  again. He died of a natural disease before getting to Rome so Sulla killed a few  thousand supporters of Marius. His goal was to see restoration of senate. He was  dictator for a year, straightens up politics and gets out. He started suppressing the  people.

First Triumvirate (59 BCE)

I. Julius Caesar, Pompey and Crassus

A. Senate will not fulfil the commanders’ promises to troops

II. Death of First Triumvirate

A. Caesar becomes too popular in Gaul

B. Pompey sides with Senate

III. Civil War (49 BCE)

A. Caesar is victorious and names himself Perpetual Dictator

B. Openly flouts tradition and flaunts power. Loved by the people, not the  Senate.

C. Assassinated on Ides (15th) of March 44 BCE  Brutus & Cassius

People were being suppressed and Sulla undermines government. Caesar makes  massive wealth in France, Crassus goes to war. Rome is getting rich from Caesar  and the poor are eating. He is popular to the people and not the government.  Pompey is asked to stand and protect Rome so eager to be popular, he agrees.  Caesar is an enemy of the state if he crosses back with the army but he gets mad  because he did so much. Pompey runs off to Egypt where he is executed; he does  this because he knew he wouldn’t win in the end. Caesar is soooo loved by the  people and he doesn’t adhere to tradition and hold multiple offices which are  normally held by diff people. He is very showy about what he has and is doing and  this gets him assassinated.  

Second Triumvirate

I. Marcus Antony, Lepidus and Octavian

A. Goals: challenge to Senate, restore Caesar’s reforms, and take control  of Rome’s armies

B. Popular among the people (the Legacy of Caesar)

II. 42 BCE- Declare the end of the Republic

III. Death of the Second Triumvirate

A. Antony marries Octavian’s sister, but is Cleopatra’s lover

B. Octavian is master of propaganda; paints Antony as a traitor  disregarding mos maiorum

C. Octavian’s troops defeat Antony’s at Actium in 31 BCE

Mission: avenge his legacy of Caesar. Marc Anthony was a trusted general, Octavian is Caesar’s grand-nephew who is his heir. Goal was to avenge death by killing the  assassinators and challenge the power of the senate and they succeed well. They  become 3 most powerful men in Rome. Antony married Octavian’s sister, they had a falling out and this makes them make up and 2 most powerful men in Rome. Marc  finds himself in Egypt and meets Cleopatra. They have a fling and she also had a  fling with Caesar. Cleopatra’s isn’t as beautiful and she is made out to be but her  attractive qualities were internal. She spoke multiple languages and she is a scholar sort of. Marc is extremely intrigued and Cleopatra’s wants in in roman politics. Marc  gets back to Rome and Octavian is furious and smart. Octavian’s mom and  Cleopatra were very powerful women in history (just fyi). Octavian is furious and  goes on a journey to undermine marc Anthony and avenge sister. He makes himself  more popular by reading Caesar’s will to the people while marc is in Egypt which the people loved because he built himself in the image of the Caesar and he also read  marcs will which is not very good… it said he wants power to go to he and  Cleopatra’s kids which made the romans very mad and there was a lot in the way of tradition that wasn’t roman. Marc is made into a bad looking persona and he is  killed; Cleopatra committed suicide. Octavian is most powerful man in Rome and  under 30 years old.  

Roman Empire

I. Octavius Augustus Caesar

A. Princeps & Background Leadership

II. Pax Romana (27 BCE – 180 CE)

A. Civil service and Bureaucracy  

B. Infrastructure

C. “Father of the Country” (2 BCE)

D. Procreation Laws

E. Subsequent Emperors’ Ideals

He gets added name of Augustus. The thing he does that makes him diff from  Caesar is instead of being called emperor or something that makes him more  powerful then everyone, he wants to be called Princeps or first of the people. This is  humility which is the image he wants. He operates in the background; he acts  humble but it the most powerful man in Rome; people love this. Pax Romana is  roman peace which is about 200 years of relative peace reaching their peak.  Aqueducts were a roman miracle and very important and expansive. Roman roads  extended over 50,000 miles (US is smaller). Some of the roads are still usable  today; built to last. This created jobs. He is being seen as father of the country and  “first roman emperor”. Nobody is ever as successful as he. Made procreation laws to build up Rome and make it stronger.  

Rise of Christianity

I. Jesus of Nazareth

A. Baptism

B. Ministry

C. Crucifixion

D. Teachings

E. Elaboration by Paul

i. John the Baptist

Happens during period of Roman Empire; launching another one of the world’s  major religious traditions. Christianity takes heavily from Jewish and Hebrew  monotheism. Jesus of Nazareth was born in a new piece of Roman Empire called  Judea or Juda. This was not a very tranquil area; lots of conflict between Jews and  roman overlords. He grew up in an atmosphere of conflict. At age 30, he passed  through a baptism by john the Baptist. John had been preaching in area about the  coming of the savior and eminent end of the world and people need to confront  their own shortcomings and address their sins. He took people to Jordan River to  symbolize washing away of sins. This baptism had a huge effect on Jesus. From 30- 33 he preached, taught and healed. He then had a small following of people. At the  age of 33 he was accused of setting himself up as king of the Jews and taken by  Romans. He was then sentenced to death by crucifixion. His followers were scared  this was the end then word spread he was alive and rose from the dead. This was a  big deal. This shows he is Gods incarnate. We know a lot of him through is disciples  and followers who continued his message. The teachings of Jesus primarily was the  fatherhood of God and the Jewish tradition of monotheism as well as a brotherhood  of humankind, a forgiveness of ones enemies, forsaking greed, resurrection,  everlasting life/ heaven. We know this from the people who followed and wrote of  him. Of all who wrote of Jesus, Paul the Baptist was most important because he  wrote extensively. He took a minor Jewish sect (Christianity) and transformed it into  a major world religion by elaborating on its theology and transforming it into a  systematic theology and 2 paramount ideas he emphasized was Jesus is Christ, that Christ was God in human form who came to earth to save humans from sin and the  other is what it takes to be saved is faith. Paul really elaborated on what is  necessary to be saved is faith and God.  

II. Spread of Christianity

A. Rivals

1. Stoicism

2. Neoplatonism

3. Cult of Mithra

4. Roman state

i. Zoroastrianism

ii. Ahura Mazda

B. Heresies: Arian

C. Problems of Empire

D. Persecutions

i. Council of Nicaea

ii. Martyrs

Begins to spread on congregations form. This spreads through Roman Empire. Part  of the success of Christianity is the failure of its rivals. A couple of philosophies were competition that are the same as religion sort of, one of these is stoicism (Zeno world is orderly and rational, reason for everything and our duty to accept and  endure, huge moral code and ethics) which was embraced by more educated  people and this was a philosophy of not getting too attached and this took place of  religion to people. Compared to Christianity, stoicism didn’t stack up. Neoplatonism  circulated in educated people; this is a roman revival of Plato who saw reality was a  separate realm of ideals that can only be grasped through intellect and highest goal was contemplating and understanding the realm of ideal beauty, etc. and this is a  very high power and non-accessible to all when Christianity is very accessible to  everyone and seemed a lot more egalitarian, open to all, democratic, etc.. The  Roman state religion was the roman adaptation of the Greek religious traditions who used the same gods but changed names into Latin; there is a very complex god  system which doesn’t stack up against the goodness of Christianity. The most  serious rival was the Cult of Mithra. This is a mystery religion; a generic expression  and a religion that offers last judgment and everlasting life and this stems from  Zoroastrianism (cosmic struggle between god of good ahura mazda and god of evil)  and Mithra is a lieutenant of Ahura Mazda in mythology of Zoroastrianism. Mithra is  being worshipped in his own right and this does stack up against Christianity; a lot  of the same promises and moral content. The huge difference that makes  Christianity more successful of the Jesus of Nazareth is a real historical figure;  someone who is known by people, has a record and was loved and good and real.  Heresies is a belief that is incorrect or false so churches have their own established  beliefs and a heresy contradicts the beliefs of the church (KNOW THIS WORD). In  Christian history, these has been many heresies that popped up really early. These  are a problem because church sees them as wrong and it divides the religion;  threatens to fracture the church and break it up; it’s a threat. In its early history,  heresies popped up undermining this as a single religion and ultimately detracted  from its success, the most profound being the Aryan heresy that has to do with  nature of the trinity which is the father, the son and the holy spirit which is 3 in 1;  this is a huge deal. The trinity was that god took 3 forms/manifestation and yet each is distinct. Arias didn’t see it this way, he believed Christ was created by God and is  separate from god. This is a heresy because it suggests polytheism over  monotheism which is a HUGE deal and issue in the early church which sparked the  movement of Arian heresy. This could have been a huge divide but it didn’t. The  early church got aggressive dealing with these threats. There was a council of  Nicaea. This is a huge meeting that can last years of high ranking clergymen that  meet over issues of doctrine; this is when they once and for all define trinity of 3 to  1; the idea is its three manifestations of one god. By adopting and formalizing it,  they end the heresy and maintain the unity of the Christian church. They did so well early on by aggressively dealing with heresies. At a certain point in history, Rome  becomes a mess. It has so many internal problems and seems to be politically  instable at a certain point and so much fighting over who is next emperor and much civil war when any conquering hero decides he wants to be emperor. There is so

much conflict that it makes people look more sympathetically at Christian  movement because they are preaching peace and passivism. Certain roman  emperors actually persecuted Christians which helps Christianity because it turns  them into MARTYRS which is someone willing to die for his or her beliefs (know this  word). The thing about persecution is when people persecute people, it makes them into martyrs and indirectly, this helps their cause and turns these people who died  for their religions into role models. This also has the effect of filtering out those who  aren’t truly committed so those left are truly devoted.  

III. Rise of Papacy

A. Specialness of Rome

B. Doctrine of Petrine Succession

C. Decline in the political authority

i. Mathew

ii. Power to loose and to bind

iii. Leo I

iv. Attila the Hun

The position of pope (spiritual leader of christening) starts out of bishops of city of  Rome and that evolves into the papacy. This happens to these specific Roman  bishops because they were more stable and didn’t have the issues of the heresies  like other bishops elsewhere. This was a special congregation and it doesn’t hurt  that it was centrally located. This is a special congregation because it was visited by Paul the Baptist as well as Peter. Peter was the first bishop of Rome. What makes it  even more special is the Doctrine of Petrine Succession (petrine-Peter) and in the  bible, Christ gives peter the power to Loose and to bind (loose = approve,  bind=forbid) which is crucial in the church power and key to papal authority. This is  Christ giving power to make doctrine to peter. All subsequent bishops in Rome have  claimed the same power over time. People kept looking to Pope for political  leadership. In 453, Attila the Hun (Huns were people from the east who migrated  into Europe and were very terrifying), Attila as very scary and invaded Rome and  were ready, willing and able to sack them. Pope Leo I meets with Attila and talks  him into leaving and sparing the city of Rome. When no emperor would, Popes  stepped up and this gave them political authority.  

The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

I. Internal problems

A. Military

B. Political

C. Economic

i. Gibbon

ii. Foederati

iii. Marcus Aurelius

iv. Commodus

v. Septimus Severus

Gibbon wrote many books on the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Gibbon  looked for a cause and wanted to attribute the fall to Christianity which promoted  passivism, blind faith for logic, etc. that undermine the empire. The fall is blamed on things from malaria to morals. This is a story of rise and fall for a single reason.  There are many causes, most of them are internal problems that weakened it,  ultimately making it vulnerable to invasion of Germanic people. Military is a huge  internal problem; there are a ton of borders to protect. By the 2nd century and the  empire stops expanding, the people don’t want to serve in their armies anymore. By the 3rd century, nobody wants to serve so start recruiting mercenaries from beyond  the frontier (Germanic) who are known as Foederati. These people are recruited by  the commander posted on the frontier. These people are fighting for money, not  Rome; these mercenaries are hit or miss and non-professional as well as they have  a history of switching sides and they only relate to their immediate commander, not the emperor or Rome. This makes the borders very weak. There are internal political problems. There is a very powerful emperor who is commander and chief, law  maker, high priest, etc. and a very autocratic empire. There is a problem and no  written rule for who ends up emperor next. This results in crisis. The current  emperor started choosing someone to success him before he died and trains this  person up until Marcus Aurelius. Marcus was a good guy and stoic philosopher  except he let family considerations override better judgement choosing his son who  was a very vicious and incompetent ruler and he was horrible. After Commodus (the son), there is a chain of horrible emperors and next was Septimus Severus and “look after the soldier and stern the rest” aka take care of your troops and forget  everyone else was what he was known by. The failure to come up with a  constitutional way to select emperors is why there were many issues. Once an  emperor died, a lot of the time the army would choose next emperor or even  overthrow and install themselves through civil war/ militarily. This destabilizes and  weakens Rome internally making it very vulnerable. There were many economic  problems. Because the empire is so large, unity is an issue. There was a cultural  divide between east and west. The eastern was more Greek, western was more  Latin culturally. The west is what really declines and falls. What makes unity  between east and west was the economy. In its hay day, the economy was  interdependent so they made surpluses and swapped goods; also this integrated  remote provinces and this worked nicely. This starts to break down and provinces  start striving for self-sufficiency and this central component to unity is crumbling.  The other economic issue is cost of labor; when the empire was built and more was  conquered, it creates a pool of slave labor or POW’s who were taken back to Rome  and sold as slaves and the net result of expansion and Punic Wars was the  introduction of slave labor. By end of 1st century, Rome is no longer expanding.  Prisoners of war were the largest slave laboring in history. As slave supply dries up,  cost of labor becomes very expansive and creates inflation (huge issue later). The  economic policies of emperors themselves becomes inflationary and they like to

debase the coinage or tamper with the value of the currency by taking some of the  metal out of the coins and create more coins which is inflationary. Messing with  coins in this way is a stupid thing to do economically because it causes inflation.  

II. Reforms

A. Diocletisn

B. Constantine

i. Prefectures

ii. Constantinople

iii. Milvian Bridge

The reason the empire lasts so long (till 476) is because of the reforms of Diocletian  and Constantine. Diocletian was a major persecute of Christians but he was  important because he was concerned of political instability and that there was so  much fighting and civil war and abuse was power. He thinks maybe we separate  civilian and military power. He redesigns government to an extent and divides  empire into a series of Prefectors or districts. Each is headed by a Prefect or  governor and this is a civilian but there is also a military commander posted too but  this isn’t the same person. He is worried of transfer of power after he dies to he  comes up with a complicated system for the next emperor where there is a co emperor and a chain of succession (complex and confusing) but Constantine  disrupts the system. He comes along and disrupts Diocletian’s plan militarily and  claims the throne in the midst of military complex. At Malian bridge, he saw a sign  (he was pagan) which was a giant cross in the sky and he took this as his sign to be  open to Christianity sand eventually convert. When he is in power, he wanted  religious tolerance and to make Christianity the main religion. By embracing  Christianity and allowing it to grow, this did breathe new life into the empire for a  bit.  

III. Barbarian Invasions

A. Germanic society

1. Tribes

2. Warfare

3. Justice

B. Invasions

i. Tacitus

ii. Comitatus

iii. Vassalage

iv. Feudalism

v. Attila the Hun

vi. Theodoric the Ostrogoth

vii. Compurgation

viii. ordeal

The barbarian invasions is what really ends the empire. They begin streaming into  the empire which destroys portions of the empire. There are the Germanic people of many subsets. These people were the founders of modern Europe. The romans  thought of them in an odd way and Tacitus wrote of these people calling them  barbarians because they were organized tribally but these tribal people had early  forms of kingdoms. This is an indication of how backward they were and how violent these people are which is ironic because the romans are really violent. He was quite impressed by them physically by their size and their scary nature as well as red hair and blue eyes. War is a way of life for these people and Tacitus said that their  system of warfare was primitive; they fought by using comitatus or Germanic wat  bank. Instead of having standing armies of troops, a local tribal chief who wanted to go to war, he would call young men together to go to battle and put down their  lives for him; a man to man relationship in return for care and pillage and steal  anything not nailed down (war booty) which is a sort of subsistence. We think these  are the origins in vassalage and feudalism. Justice is backward for the Germanic  people as well; there are 2 types of trials. One is compurgation which is talking to  the heavens and witnesses and oaths are taken these people are brought in which  this had a huge effect on modern world. The other has the person hold red hot iron  and then wrap the hands up, unwrap the hands and see what happened; if they heal nicely, the supernatural things indicate goodness and if it festers, they are guilty.  These are the people who polish off the Roman Empire. For ages they lived at the  frontier and the romans had plenty knowledge of these people; they coexist at the  frontier. At around 400 CE, the Huns start entering Europe from the east and start  terrifying the Germanic people and they start into empire to stay away from Huns  and by 476, they are all over the western part of the empire and they take over,  They don’t come in thinking about taking over and converting it; they come in,  settles, and think themselves as romans! They saw this whole phenomenon as them becoming romans but they didn’t have the cultural background to sustain roman  way of life and that’s how it perishes.

Page Expired
5off
It looks like your free minutes have expired! Lucky for you we have all the content you need, just sign up here