finalstudy.pdf FIN 4424
Popular in Problems in Financial Management
IR 350, HI 334
verified elite notetaker
Popular in Finance
This 14 page Study Guide was uploaded by Emily Michel on Tuesday March 22, 2016. The Study Guide belongs to FIN 4424 at Florida State University taught by Dr. Don Autore in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 165 views. For similar materials see Problems in Financial Management in Finance at Florida State University.
Reviews for finalstudy.pdf
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 03/22/16
Exam 2 Study Guide Chapter 9- Cost of Capital=minimum acceptable return on a new project, you have to ‘hurdle’ your initial investment and earn AT LEAST the cost to invest in the project. (Also known as the hurdle rate) -Its an opportunity cost in investors eyes- think about the rate of returns that can be earned elsewhere in the market at the same level of risk, possible opportunities that would be lost if the project were to be taken on. Components are equity, debt and preferred stock. Turned into a weighted average rate of return that is required by shareholders and debt holders. WACC- risk adjusted weighted average cost of capital. If project’s risk is similar to companies overall risk the WACC can be used as a discount rate. After-tax Cost of Debt- Interest on debt is deductible and reduces taxable profit. To find the After Tax Cost of Debt…(r = cost od debt, T =corporate tc rate) R d(1-T )c *8 percent coupon bond with YTM of 15%; company wants to issue new bonds with similar YTM and at par. Tax rate is marginal and 40 percent. After-tax cost of debt? R =15%=YTM 15*(1-.40)=9% d T c40 Cost of Pref. Stock- R psost of PS D=dividend P 0price of stock at time 0 (make sure adjusted for flotation costs if given) *To adjust for flotation costs take whatever percent given, ex. 7%, away from the market price, ex. $40. (40*93%=$37.2 would be the adjusted price) Equation= R = Dps P 0 Cost of Equity 1) Cost of Retained Earnings- opportunity cost involved with reinvesting earnings instead of giving them out, stockholders themselves could invest them and create value for themselves; by not distributing the earnings this opportunity is taken away. The company should at least produce the return the stockholders could make for it to be worth it to keep the funds inside the company. To estimate: Rs=R rfB (r m r ) rf= beta, Rrf=risk free rate, Rm=market rate Or… R = s /P 1+ g0à D1=dividend at time 1, P0= price at time 0, g=growth rt Note: There are subjective ways to value cost of retained earnings. Sometimes they take the long-term bond yield and add 2-5% buffer or risk premium. They do this because risky firms with low ratings on debt are probably going to also have high- risk equity that is usually more expensive than long-term debt. 2) Cost of New Common Stock R nsD /(1 (1-0)) + g à F-flotation costs P0(1-F)=The adjusted stock price *Flotation costs make retained earnings a cheaper source of financing than new stock issuances. WACC- WACC= (r *(Ss D+S+PS))+(r (1-T )*d (D+ScPS))+(r (PS/(D+S+PS))ps WACC=( r *w +(r *w )+(r *w ) s s) d d ps ps R scost fo equity( RE or new stock) R psost Pref. Stock R (1-T)=After-tax Cost of Debt d D;S;PS=market values of each And the fraction in first equation is used for the weights, simplified in second eq. Value of Operations to get Intrinsic Stock Price The primary source of value is the value of operations. V opFCF (10g))/(WACC-g) A secondary source comes from non-operating assets, like short-term investments. Add Value of Ops and Short Term investments to get Total Value. Subtract Debt and Preferred Stock to get the Value of Equity. Divide By shares outstanding and get the estimated intrinsic value of the stock. **Can also value stock price through Price Multiples. 1) PE ratio (price to earnings) - share price relative to earnings per share -P/E * Expected Earnings =Price -Used often with IPOs -Can compare earnings with industry earnings -Underwrites will price IPO based on earnings from peer firms *However, they’re schemers because they only look at peers with higher PE ratios! Leads to overvaluation which is bad for the company but good for their own wallets! 2) PEG ratio (P/E)/g; includes growth -Problem with it: the units do not make sense -Ratio below 1 may indicate a good buy for investors -g is hard to estimate so throws of worth of the ratio Note: When a stock is overvalued a company will issue more to get money at overvalued price and it will drive down to true amount, When a stock is undervalued the company will buy it back because they know it’s a good deal and that the price is likely to go up. Chapter 10- Capital Budgeting –All about whether or not to invest in a project, which project to choose. The most used method presently to test a projects worth is Net Present Value. NPVà Present value of Inflows-Present Value of Outflows The difference between market value of a project and its cost. n =-Initial Outlay+ CF/(1+r)+….CF /(1+r)n Steps to Find: 1) Estimate future cash flows 2) Estimate required return 3) Find PV of the cash flows and subtract the initial outlay. • If positive, the project is making money. (The return>cost of capital) • If 0, the return is still equal to the cost of capital, so it still meets the minimum acceptable return the company requires. So it is okay and common for NPVs to equal 0. • If negative, the project does not meet the company standards and should be rejected. **Problem: Does not take into account size of the project. **Stock at efficient market NPV=0 because return expected=required return. Note: When comparing projects that have similar NPVS, look at Margin for Error. Ex: How much can the projects cash flows can be reduced and still produce a positive NPV. This considers and compares riskiness of the projects. IRRà The rate when NPV equals 0. • This is to show the return that is needed for the project that makes the PV of inflows and PV of outflows cancel each other out to 0. Accept if greater than required return. -Managers like to compare rates so they sometimes favor IRR, also it is simple to communicate -Normally NPV and IRR produce the same decision, but sometimes this does not happen and IRR is UNRELIABLE. Like when there are… • Non-conventional cash flows (more cash flows than just the IO are negative, usually everything after the IO is positive, sign changes [-++-+] would be non- conventional) • Mutually Exclusive Projects- (You can use one or the other project, not both.) *When there are non-conventional cash flows, there is more than 1 IRR. In this case the IRR is considered useless! And not even worth calculating! *With mutually exclusive projects, sometimes the Initial Outlays are very different. One project may get a huge return/IRR but it only generates a little wealth for the company when compared to the other choice. Ex. Project A- IO=100, IRR=60% NPV=500 Project B- IO=1000, IRR=40%, NPV=1500 *If deciding on IRR, one would pick A, but on NPV one would pick B. What really is the deciding factor is how much wealth is being produced. Even though A has a great return, B is still producing WAY more wealth and is more beneficial to the company and shareholders. Goal of Financial Management: maximize shareholder wealth! When deciding between mutually exclusive projects go with NPV decision making!!! Note: This will also happen between IRR and NPV if larger cash flows occur earlier in the projects life. IF they occur earlier the IRR will be higher than a project that has the larger cash flows later on. NPV Profile -Shows a projects NPV against different costs of capital. -Crossover Rate is found by taking the differences of the projects cash flows, and solving for IRR. -When line A is above Line B, it has a greater NPV. But, after the crossover point line B has a greater NPV. -The differences between the projects can result from timing of cash flows, or size differences. Profitability Index- less frequently used =(PV(FCF))/CF 0 *Only with traditional projects with initial outlay *A plus is that is gives a degree of risk: how much the profit will cover the initial outlay. *Really doesn’t give any more info than NPV and IRR. Payback Period- =Number of Years Prior to Full Recover+ (Unrecovered Cost at Start of Year/Cash Flow during Full Recovery Year) -Number of years to recover funds, Accept if meets companies arbitrary cut off date -Ignores Time Value of Money completely -Cash flows beyond payback period are ignored when making decision, what is it makes Millions and is not considered because does not meet the payback period requirement! -Does not tell us how much wealth the project generates Discounted Payback Period- First, Discount all of the Cash Flows to make up for the Time Value of Money Problem. Then, do the same equation. **The payback methods do provide information on liquidity and risk. (Shorter=More liquid) MIRR- IRR makes the mistake of assuming the cash flows are reinvested at IRR and not the cost of capital. MIRR assumes cash flows are reinvested at WACC, cost of capital. PV of Costs=TV/(1+MIRR) n 1) Take the present value of cash outflows (negative). If this is just the IO then just use that. (It is already in Present Value because at time 0). 2) Then, take the future value of all inflows and sum. (Compound to the TERMINAL YEAR(TV)) 3) The MIRR will be the discount rate that causes the PV of the terminal value to equal the cost. Plug everything into the equation and solve for MIRR. *This is superior to IRR in that it shows more of a TRUE rate of return on the project. Conclusion: Always go with the greatest NPV, because that demonstrates which project will be the most wealth producing. Chapter 11- Cash Flow Estimation -When doing capital budgeting, Incremental Cash Flows and Operating Cash Flows are important. *Do Not take Sunk costs into consideration. Incremental Cash Flows= Any cash flows the company will have taking on the project minus cash flows if the firm does NOT take on the project. (Opportunity costs, externalities (lost sales from other projects)) Sunk Cost= already incurred cost that cannot be recovered, ex: 50,000 spent to rusty pipes 2 years ago Depreciable Basis= Cost+Shipping+Installation Operating Cash Flows Sales -Costs -Depreciation =EBIT -Taxes(% of EBIT) +Depreciation =Net OP. Cash Flow If there is a salvage value the cash flow is… Salvage Value-Book Value=Gain or Loss Apply tax to the gain or loss and subtract from sale value. Get the terminal Cash Flow. *Sale at a loss provides a tax credit! (subtracting a negative, so really adding it) Once all the cash flows are settled, you can use NPV, MIRR, payback, etc… Ex. A company has asked to evaluate an acquisition of a new equipment. The basic price is $70,000, and it would cost another $15,000 to modify it for special use by your firm. Use straight line depreciation for 3 years and there is a salvage value of $20,000. Use of the equipment requires Net working capital of $4,000. Will save the company $25,000 a year in before tax operating costs. Tax rate=40%. Cost of cap. =10% A) What is the year 0 net cash flow? • Price-modification-NWC • -70,000-15,000-4,000= -89,000 B) What are the net operating cash flows in year 1, 2 and 3? • To get Depreciation Tax Shield: Depreciable Basis * 1/3 • 70,000+15,000=85,000*1/3=28333.33=Dep. Expense/Year • Depr. Expense*Tax Rate=Shield • 28333.33*.4=113,33.33 • Year 1: After tax savings-Depreciation Tax Shield=Net Cash Flow • =25,000(1-.4)-11,333.33=3666.67 • Since Depreciation Tax shield and Annual savings are the same, the cash flow for year 2 and 3 are the same. C) What is the additional end-of project cash flow? Salvage Value=$20,000 Tax=20,000 (.4)=-8,000 • 20,000-BV remaining in year 4 • 85,000(0)=BV=0, because fully depreciated • If not fully depreciated, then would have to subtract remaining book value from sale of salvage. Return on Net working Capital=4,000 =16,000 D) What is the NPV and should it be accepted? • PV inflows – Initial Outlay • -89,000+3333.3+3030.3+14,776.6=-67859.8 • So, the Project should be rejected because negative NPV. Risk in Capital Budgeting -Measured by standard deviation 1) Stand-Alone: risk created by a specific project, measured by variability of the single project, how risky is the project itself? 2) Corporate Risk: harder to calculate than stand-alone, assessed with intuition and the potential impact of a project on earnings. Measured by project’s corporate beta (how it aligns with companies other projects) How risky is the project when combined with the companies other endeavors (assets, projects) Diversification within the firm. 3) Market Risk- systemic risk, beta, how will the project impact investors? Will it maximize shareholder wealth? What effect will the project have on the company’s beta? Sensitivity Analysis- How NPV or IRR are affected by changes in inputs -All variables are fixed except the one you are testing -Use to answer, “What if…ex. Costs are $10,000 more?” 1) Find the ‘base case’ output (NPV or IRR) at the ‘base case’ input value (what we are measuring the sensitivity of) 2) Find value of NPV or IRR at a new input level. 3) Find % change in output and % change in input. 4) Divide change in output % by the change in input % and get the sensitivity. Graph (example) -Steeper=Riskier, which means more sensitive to small changes -Negative: does not reflect diversification, the variable changing is not necessarily likely (like sales may have a steep line, but in reality the sales figure is unlikely to change at all so it doesn’t matter), ignores relationships between variables (bc have to keep all others constant) -Positive: Shows some stand-alone risk, Identifies threatening variables that need to be watched out for, gives breakeven info Scenario Analysis -examines different possible situations -Best case, Most likely case, worst case -Pair Probability of scenario with its outcome and take a weighted like average. Ex. -Negatives: only considers a few outcomes, there are definitely more case than best, worst and most likely…, Assumes inputs are all clumped together (does not account for some bad happening with some best case simultaneously), focuses mainly on stand- alone risk Simulation Analysis- computerized continuous probability distribution of NPV or IRR based on simulated values that repeats the process 1,000 times or more. -“Garbage in, garbage out” *All of the analyses do not provide decision rules and ignore diversification. Focus on stand alone risk. *Critical Value(CV) measures a projects stand-alone risk Real Options-responding to market changes through actions -alert managers look for real options, while smarter ones create them 1) Investment Timing Options-procrastinating on starting a project is bad, but waiting can actually payoff sometimes. For example, on risky projects it is better to see how some things play out before starting a project, more knowledge=less risk Other Real Options are 2) Growth Options and choosing to 3) abandon the project. Ex. Decision Tree w/ Real Option Decision Probability Cash Flow r=14% IO=-50Million n=3years High .25 33 Mil Market .5 25 mil Low .25 5 Mil *There is a real option present: wait a year because so much variation/risk. See how market goes; knowledge=less risk in decision making. Use Standard Deviation to show risk in the project, shows variation between outcomes. The Standard Deviation comes out to be $24.02 Million, which shows there is a big chance of losing a lot! So to weigh the option of waiting a year, start Initial investment at time 1, and push everything back one year when discounting. When doing this the standard deviation becomes 8.57, which is a lot less risky. Note: 1 standard deviation away from the mean in either direction covers 68% of the outcomes, 2 standard deviations covers 95% and 3 covers 99%. (if normally distributed) Also, It is not always the best to wait. If there is little risk of negative NPV it is probably better to go ahead with the project. Magnitude of numbers matter! Ch. 15- Capital Structure Decisions How to mix Debt and Equity… Leverage= (DEBT)/(DEBT+EQUITY) *similar leverages within industries *The more assets a company has the more debt they can take on. -This is why high tech companies and pharmaceutical companies take on LESS debt, they do not have as many assets as collateral. *Leverage magnifies risk and return Many Theories on what ratio is the best. 1) Tax Trade-off Theory: balance the costs of debt to the tax benefits, interest tax shield 2) Dynamic Tradeoff Theory: No exact optimal #, equates for costs of readjustment, realizes the optimal number is not static and when the ratio moves away from the optimal amount the company needs to readjust. 3) Pecking Order- For financing, use retained earnings first, then debt, and then equity as a last resort. It is a bad signal to investors to issue equity, stock price falls after they do. 4) Dynamic Pecking Order Theory: announce earnings and THEN issue the stock, shows transparency to investors and gets rid of the information problem Pecking order theory has 5) Market Timing Theory-issue bonds when interest is low, stock offering when stock price is high. Most intuitive because gets the most value 6) Agency Theory: Set the debt amount so that manager behave, but not to too much that they would pass up a positive NPV in decision making . More debt means there is less chance for managers to misuse, but too much debt can cause an underinvestment. Financial Flexibility= Shown by a companies use of leverage and cash holdings. Affects decisions to issue debt the most. Modigliani and Miller *Debt can cover taxes but too much increases bankruptcy costs. *There is an optimal ratio. -compares value and cost of capital to Leverage. When there are no taxes or bankruptcy costs, the capital structure is irrelevant because taking the debt on will not cover any tax expenses and you can take as much debt on without worrying about bankruptcy costs. The cost of capital stays the same because no bankruptcy costs. In a world with taxes and no bankruptcy, a firm’s value increases with the more debt it takes on! Also, cost of capital goes down with the more debt because of the tax shield. In the real world, the firm’s value increases with debt to an optimal point and then starts to fall. This is because the bankruptcy costs start to outweight the tax benefits. The cost of capital should be minimized and it is at the right amount of debt. Hamada’s Equation-used to determine effects of financial leverage has on a firm, shows business risk. Used to find the optimal structure. The (D/E) is the weight of the debt to the weight of the stock(equity). When weight of debt goes up, beta rises. Beta represents the business risk and leveraging affect. The B 1in the equation, also B , iu Beta with 0 debt. -Use the CAPM to find cost of equity from the found Beta! Rs=rm+B (RPM) Lev *If market to book ratio is high the stock may be overvalued and the company should issue stock. *Goal should be to minimize cost of capital. *The theories do not account for why 0 leveraged firms sometimes do really well. Has to do with executives in charge. More conservative personalities will take on less debt. IPO Process 1) File a 100 page document to the SEC called an S-1 2) It gets approved be preliminary prospectus 3) Filing Price Range is set and solicit feedback about how much it is worth through roadshows, book building and marketing. -If good feedback, choose to set IPO price higher. 4) Final Prospectus is made, the offer price is finalized. If the IPO is underpriced, after the first day the price will pop. To calculate IPO underpricing or money left on the table: (Price at end of 1 Day on st market-Offer)*number of shares *Sometimes for free marketing, they intentionally set the price low to get a POP in price, which creates buzz. -IPOs generally underperform for the initial years when compared to the average firm. Underwriters- investment bankers that raise capital for the company from investors Syndicate-group of investment bank that work on the IPO -Sometimes underwriters are schemers and hand pick certain peer firms to base the stock price on, they pick a “peachy offer price” that is based on the highest valued peer firms. This is unethical and has been uncovered through research, the IPO comes out overvalued. The stock will generally do well in the first 6 months, and underwriters will buy shares to up the price. Also, if you as a regular investor can get allocation and can buy IPO shares that means the big investors probably do not want it. Proceeds-Underwriting Fee(typically7%)=Net Proceeds Gross Spread=underwriters fees Shelf Registration: Get securities approved ahead of time to shorten the process of the IPO and accelerate the offer. This helps if the company needs immediate cash. -used to be allowed only for large companies but now more can do this, and smaller companies should not necessarily do this, must be investment grade to do this -many problems with underwriters not doing due diligence with the accelerated offers SEO: seasoned equity offering, follow-on offerings, lack the announcement effect, they face underpricing, but the gross spread is more negotiable. Dilution is when the company offers completely new shares. -When short selling is high for a company, they are likely to issue because it shows that the stock price is expected to drop. -Short selling signals overvalued stock -Issuing will cause the stock price to drop Repurchase: If a company thinks its stock is undervalued it will repurchase the shares at a low price and through supply and demand the stock price will go up. Private Placement Offers- to small group of investors, not public, Lacks announcement affects, w/o SEC review; cost effective way for small businesses to raise capital. Flotation Costs: loss of capital from information problems between firms and investors
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'