PHI 105 Week 6-DQ 1
PHI 105 Week 6-DQ 1
Popular in Course
verified elite notetaker
Popular in Department
This 0 page Study Guide was uploaded by expert Notetaker on Tuesday November 17, 2015. The Study Guide belongs to a course at a university taught by a professor in Fall. Since its upload, it has received 18 views.
Reviews for PHI 105 Week 6-DQ 1
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 11/17/15
Week 6 Discussion Question 1 The ontological argument is based more upon reason and the cosmological and teleological arguments are based more upon observation The ontological argument stems from the concept that God exists and represents St Anselm39s most substantial contribution to the philosophy of religion Anselm was the first philosopher to argue the existence of God without applying any religious premises and considered God to be the greatest being conceivable and quota being than which nothing greater can be conceivedquot Moore amp Bruder 2008 p 426 The cosmological argument a type of argument that involves worldly observation claims that the existence of things that could possibly not have existed contingent explains the existence of a necessary being God as the creator of such things Moore amp Bruder 2008 p 430 431 This type of argument arises from human curiosity that naturally wonders why there is something instead of nothing Stanford 2008 The teleological argument is similar to the cosmological argument in that it arises from a natural standpoint and suggests that everything exists because of a higher power The teleological argument takes the cosmological argument one step further by giving explanation to our questions about not only where everything came from but where the beauty and design properties of everything came from Stanford 2008 I think I agree more with the cosmological and teleological arguments than the ontological argument I have difficulty wrapping my head about St Anselm39s concepts regarding God I39m one of the people who think that his ideas are just doubletalk and his arguments are quotjust becausequot arguments and that doesn39t y with me When ask myself questions about God and existence I don39t just wonder where we came from I also wonder what made humans and everything the way they are individually What made owers so colorful and pretty Where did color come from How could such beautiful things be spontaneous I believe that a superior being had a plan for the creation of all and continues to have a plan for the creation of all in the future As far as which arguments about the existence of God were most fascinating and convincing to me I would honestly have to say the anchoress Julia of Norwich Julian believed in God with all her heart but her belief system was different than Anselm and Aquinas39 it had a lot to do with mysticism as well as focusing on the nature of personal and religious knowledge She believed that some people had come into direct contact with God in some way or another and this fact alone was substantive proof that God existed Moore amp Bruder 2008 p 432 434 I am not saying that this type of explanation doesn39t still leave me with questions and even doubts but I still consider explanations based on experiences and real substance to be better than those based solely on philosophical argument References Cosmological Argument September 2008 Retrieved February 1 2010 from httpplatostanfordeduentriescosmological argument T eleological Arguments June 2005 Retrieved February 2 2010 from httpzlplatostanfordeduentriesteleological arguments
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'