Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to UW - Botany 260 - Class Notes - Week 12
Join StudySoup
Get Full Access to UW - Botany 260 - Class Notes - Week 12

Already have an account? Login here
Reset your password

UW / zoology / ZOOLOGY 260 / What are the goals of human wildlife conflicts ?

What are the goals of human wildlife conflicts ?

What are the goals of human wildlife conflicts ?


School: University of Wisconsin - Madison
Department: zoology
Course: Introductory Ecology
Professor: Adrian treves
Term: Summer 2015
Cost: 25
Name: Nov 19 Notes (EXAM 3)
Description: Tuesday was Exam, this is thursday's notes.
Uploaded: 11/22/2015
4 Pages 119 Views 1 Unlocks

Tuesday, November 19, 2015

What are the goals of human wildlife conflicts ?


Conservation Interventions (Strategies)

Any threat to an ecosystem has more than one feasible intervention. Always more than  one. Do not use it as the only solution to the problem.

One is aimed at the head, persuasion and education. Another is prevention and  modification of human behaviors.  

In the last 20 years the accumulated consensus has come to be that it is important to  understand the communication when talking about conservation.  

Conservation requires a plan

This is a generic product cycle. The arrows are like a clock advancing.  Redefine and choose a new goal or you are done.

Most conservation products go through the cycle many times.

The blue boxes are defined.  

What are the difference between direct and indirect interventions?

Articulate: be able to explain, inspirational long time away

Define C.G.: specific and attainable. Work on daily to help.

Threats: What opposes this. (Obstacles and constraints)

Intervention: abates a threat

Monitoring plan: measure success or failure

Intervene: Do. Act.

Evaluate and Adapt: Change and start again

Look at synonyms on PowerPoint. We need to be able to translate between individuals  languages

Assignments that lie ahead:  

Foley video that we previously watched articulates a threat. We also discuss several other topics like Who are the architects of the parthenon, 447-432 bc?

When a tree falls  

Watch videos and really understand their cycle that was just talked about.

We will help you differentiate the elements. Analyze them.

What are the indirect ways to intervene?

Go backwards in the cycle to understand our steps of completing the goal.

Human Wildlife Conflicts

Wildlife threaten something claimed by people

Two goals:

1. Human welfare goal. Most conservation groups use this as a goal. 2. Protect biodiversity and ecosystem. Very few want to see a species go extinct. Arrows on slide show cause and effect.  

Bright Red: threats impact human welfare. Humans may be reacting to the animals and  it could damage the biodiversity.

Lighter Red: people may not want to conserve these species. Which may lead to  humans want to kill animals. They must oppose it to such an extent that they act on it.  

These arrows are hypothesis – proposed cause and effect not proven.

Most important thing that came from conservation planning, make conservationists  have an explicit conservation hypothesis. They would assert that when humans retaliate  against wildlife the biodiversity is harmed (they assumed this).  

“We believe” in front of all of it, will lead to doubts. That is why it so important to be  explicit. Forcing the conservation planners to be more specific if makes you more  efficient in resources and effective in answers. Don't forget about the age old question of How to construct a recursive method?

The team can ask the tough questions.  


Direct and indirect

Direct interventions I will directly abate the threats

Indirect if I improve human tolerance for wildlife, people will not oppose conservation Organizations used to pour money into things that were not working hypothesis wise

We will have to build something like this. Colors to distinguish differences. Use structures.  Be careful about arrows. Will be based on videos.

Planning to be systematic, there are a lot of conservation options.  Wildlife threat and human interest. Humans respond.  

Ways to Intervene:


- Barriers (fencing, netting, open areas used as a buffer)

If you decide this class of barriers are interesting to use in the conservation  process, you still have a variety of methods. Think of it as a menu (can modify).

- Guards or Supervision (Children, dogs, llamas) If you want to learn more check out What is markovinkov's rule?

- Deterrents (chemical repellants, light device, etc)

- Reduce awareness of property or people (take away dead horse, use chili’s) - Manipulate other wildlife or habitat (frozen apples for polar bear,  supplemental feeding and busy work)

- Lethal controls (form of hunting, poisoning)

- Non-lethal controls – shock collar, trap and relocate

- Create Protected areas –

- Protect wildlife from humans


- Co-management

- Compensation, or insurance (pay for loss of domestic animals) - Sharing and informing (broadcasts, field trips) If you want to learn more check out What general pattern describes human heterosexual mating preferences?
If you want to learn more check out Desert occur at what latitude?
Don't forget about the age old question of Are there problems in animal production and abuse?

- Policies and laws

Comments about it:

We act because we’ve thought. Make sure we are not acting out of habit. Think prior  to acting in situations. Question the idea. Videos do not make that very clear.  

After thanksgiving- talk about criteria to evaluate interventions.  

Think what is compatible. Common sense way.  

To be Continued next lecture.

Page Expired
It looks like your free minutes have expired! Lucky for you we have all the content you need, just sign up here