New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Final Study Guide

by: Alyssa Hendrixson

Final Study Guide CJ 461

Alyssa Hendrixson
GPA 3.0

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

Criminal Law II
Daniel Clay
Study Guide
50 ?




Popular in Criminal Law II

Popular in Criminal Justice

This 19 page Study Guide was uploaded by Alyssa Hendrixson on Monday December 7, 2015. The Study Guide belongs to CJ 461 at University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa taught by Daniel Clay in Summer 2015. Since its upload, it has received 140 views. For similar materials see Criminal Law II in Criminal Justice at University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa.

Similar to CJ 461 at UA

Popular in Criminal Justice


Reviews for Final Study Guide


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 12/07/15
Adjudication: Bail  First/initial appearance o Next step following formal arrest o Triggered by  Prosecutor filing a complaint  Grand jury indictment  This changes the process somewhat o Required within 48 hours of arrest  County of Riverside v. McLaughlin  Don’t forget the McNabb­Mallory Rule o 4 primary purposes  Notice of criminal charges  Notice of constitutional rights  Miranda  Pre­trial  Speedy trial  Preliminary (probably cause hearing)  Determination of bail/pre­trial release  Appointment of counsel o Plea may be entered at this time  Presumptive pleas th  8  Amendment o Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor  cruel and unusual punishments inflicted  Bail o Do not have a federal constitutional right to bail  Most state constitutionals provide right to bail, except in capital  cases o Primary purpose of bail is to guarantee the defendant’s appearance at trial  Anything beyond this is excessive (minimum standard)  Only 62% of defendants make bail  Surety jurisdictions v. money bail jurisdictions  ROR – rare, but effective  Importance of bail  Avoid pre­trial detention (presumption of innocence)  Avoid personal hardship (presumption of innocence)  Assist in own defense (Due Process Right) o Bail reform act of 1984  Creates rebuttable presumption of pre­trial release  Rebuttable by showing of “clear and convincing evidence” of:  Risk of flight  Risk to the community  Obstruct justice  Threaten witnesses or jurors  OR certain crimes (drugs, violence, capital cases)  If rebutted, “preventative detention” subject to periodic review o Pre­Trial Detention  Substantive Due Process  Not punitive  Inherently fair?  Procedural Due Process  Clear and convincing evidence, subject to cross­examination  Procedurally fair? o United States v. Salerno (2009)  Denied bail, then appealed it (violated 8  Amendment)  Court denied bail again, didn’t violate any rights  Procedurally fair, but not guaranteed bail o Bell v. Wolfish (1979)  Presumed innocent  Court didn’t care that they are being held in a jail and did not have  bail  Usual conditions for a jail The Right to Counsel  Development of the Right to Counsel o Powell v. Alabama (1932)  Indigents “incapable of defending themselves” o Johnson v. Zerbst (1938)  Indigent counsel in federal cases o Betts v. Brady (1942)  Refused to require indigent counsel in state cases  But did recognize a “special circumstances test” o Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)  States have to provide counsel if indigent  Wrongfully convicted because he did not have counsel  Scope of the Right of Counsel o Attaches when “formal criminal proceedings are initiated”  The initial appearance o Attaches at all “critical stages of prosecution” – those that affect the ability  to present a defense  Arraignment/initial hearing  Preliminary hearing  Post­indictment line­up  Custodial interrogation  Plea bargaining  Trial  Sentencing o Does not include Grand Jury or bail  Felony v. Misdemeanor Offenses o Scott v. Illinois (1979)  Entitled to counsel in misdemeanor crimes unless fined  Cannot be sentenced to jail  If counsel is given, jail time is possible o Porter v. McCollum (2009)  Right to Counsel o No counsel – no jail o Indingency Determinations  Public assistance  Income  Available funds o No right to select appointed counsel  Morris v. Slappy (1983)  Different for non­indigents  Effective Legal Representation o Very difficult to prove  A “reasonable probability” that the result would have been different  BUT FOR the attorney under the “totality of the circumstances”  (PREJUDICE)  Civil suits, must prove “actual innocence” o Deficient performance, minimum standards  Knowledge of the law  Minimum duty of consultation  Duty to investigate  Immigrant consequences o Non­Deficient Performance  No duty to break legal rules (perjury)  Strategy receives deference, if reasonable  Right to Self­Representation o Known as “Pro­se”  The “idiot for an attorney” o Judged only have notify defendant of charges, right to counsel. And of the  possible punishment o Waiver or right must be unequivocal, subject to:  Notice (not last minute decision)  Competence  Disruption (can lose the right) o May still appoint “stand­by” counsel The Jury Trial  Constitutional right to a jury o Article III Section 2  The trail of al crimes shall be by jury; a trial shall be held in the  th state where said crimes have been committed. o 6  Amendment o 14  Amendment  Limitations on the right to a jury o Dies not apply to “petty offenses”  Blanton v City of North Las Vegas *1989)  Several 6 month charges  Severity considerations o US. V Nachtigal (1993) o Lewis v US  Several 6 month charges o Codispoti v. Pennsylvania (1974)  Criminal contempt proceeding depend on actual sentence o Number of jurors  Thompson v. Utah  12 people on a jury  Williams v. Florida  6 people on a jury o Ballew v. Georgia (1978)  5 people on a jury  Court said no  6 people is enough  Jury selection o Jury venire requirements  Random selection  Non­discrimination  Subject to “exemptions”  Equal protection clause applies  Proved by “rule of exclusion” o Defense must show “substantial underrepresentation” o Government then must show it did no intentionally  discriminate and underrepresentation is due to other  factors (i.e. registrations)  Fair cross­section of the community o Theoretically prevents jury stacking o Challenges  “Distinctive group” is excluded  Representation is not fair and reasonable  Underrepresentation is a result of systematic  exclusion  Intent is not relevant o Voir Dire  Judge or lawyers or both conduct questioning  Look at specific requirements articulated in: o Ham v. South Carolina (1973) o Rosales –Lopez v. US (1981) o Turner v. Murray (1989)  Answers can result in juror exclusion  Preemptory challenges (no reason) o Cannot be used in a discriminatory fashion (Baston  Test)  Challenges for cause (bias/prejudice) o Ultimately judge’s decision  Death qualified juries  Bifurcated Trials  “For cause exclusion” of the morally opposed o Historically applied to the sentencing phase o Lockhart v. McCree (1986)  Related Trial Rights o Public Trial  Derives from the Star Chamber  FICA Courts  Applies to all hearing and phases of the trial “reasonably  substantial” to the defendant’s defense against the criminal charges  In some situations the public may be excluded  Press may be excluded at P/C hearing if prejudicial  The defendant does not have an absolute right to attend his own  trial  If disruptive may be removed and allows to watch in CCTV  Other “restraint” mechanisms may be too prejudicial o Shackles with a table cloth  Juveniles  The trial rights o Opening statements o Presentation of evidence  Prosecution’s case­in­chief  Direct examination  Cross examination th  6  amendment confrontation clause  Not necessarily face­to­face: children  Hearsay o Generally excluded, no confrontation o Testimonial statements of someone no longer  available (i.e. dead) may be admitted  Must have had opportunity to X o Nontestimonial statements admissible  When not taken to gather evidence o Closing arguments o Jury instructions  Beyond a reasonable doubt  Burden of proof vs. burden of persuasion o Jury deliberations  Must occur for a ‘reasonable amount of time” before declaring a  mistrial  The Allen/Dynamite Charge (proportions and hold­outs)  Jury may be polled  Jury unanimity  Required at the federal level  28 states require unanimity (tipping point?)  Jury nullification  Sentencing  Purposes and Types of Sentences o Review of purposes of punishments  Retribution  Deterrence  Specific deterrence  General deterrence  Rehabilitation  Incapacitation  Restoration o Types of sentences  Imprisonment  Fines  Probation  Intermediate sanctions (i.e. community service)  Death  Civil forfeiture  History of sentencing o Sentencing in the U.S. derives from English common law  Historically emphasized harsh punishments, not imprisonment  Felonies = executions  Misdemeanors = corporal punishment, restitution, humiliation  The Salem Witch trials  Lasted until the ratification of the Bill of Rights (1791) o 8 Amendment prohibition on “cruel and unusual” punishment  Emphasized imprisonment  Puritan’s and penitentiaries  Emphasized indeterminate sentences  Established a sentencing range o Minimum and maximum  Individualization o During the 1970s, U.S. reversed positions on indeterminate sentences  Too much individual discretion of judges  Replaced by “determinate” or “foxed-time sentencing”  Uniformity in sentencing  “X” years for “X” offense  The “One size fits all” approach o Resulted in the adoption of the USSG  Computation of sentence based on criminal history and the characteristics of the offense  Mandatory until 2005  Made “advisory” in United States v. Booker  Imposing Sentences o Despite the guidelines, in the Federal system there are specific procedures that must be followed:  The Presentence Report  Sentencing Hearing  The Right of Allocation  Victim Impact Statements  The Decision  Begins with the USSG  Based upon a wide range of information o Some information must be determined by a jury  Consecutive v. Concurrent sentences o May be “overruled” by:  Clemency  Pardon  Appeals  Reviewing Sentencing o All sentences must comport with the 8 amendment  What does “cruel and unusual” mean?  Methods of punishment  The death penalty o Violation for juvenile offenses  Imprisonment o Length of imprisonment and conditions o Three Strikes Laws o Juvenile Life without parole  Considerations  Legislative enactments  Sentencing practices  Nature of punishment  Offenders  Nature of the crime  Penological justification  Miller v. Alabama Chapter 11  Absolute Immunity o Judges, prosecutors, witnesses, and jurors may not be sued for acts undertaken as  part of the judicial function  Bivens Legal Suit o Federal law enforcement officers and other federal employees may be sued for  violating an individual’s constitutional rights or a right under federal law  Civilian Review o Civilian review boards in most large cities investigate and recommend  punishments for police found to have engaged in misconduct  Color of State Law o An act under the authority of state or federal law  Dual Sovereignty Doctrine o An individual may be prosecuted twice for the same offense by different  jurisdictions  Federal Tort Claims Act o A federal statute that authorizes an individual to sue the federal government for  various torts  Injunction o A judicial order directing a halt to a harmful act or policy  Patter­or­Practice Decree o A judicial order requiring a police department to adopt various reforms  Qualified Immunity o Police officers, correctional officers, and other criminal justice professionals may  be sued only for violating “well­established” constitutional rights  Title 42, Section 1983 of the U.S. Code o Individuals may be sued for acting under the color of state law for violating an  individual’s constitutional rights or a federal right   Tort Actions o A state court suit for damages to compensate individuals who have suffered harm Chapter 12  Bail o Release prior to trail typically based on the payment of ten percent of a fixed bail  amount  Bail Clause o Clause in the 8  Amendment that prohibits the requirement of excessive bail  Complaint o A prosecutor’s filing of a sworn statement charging a defendant with a specific  offense or offenses  Critical Stages of the Prosecution o Those phases of the prosecution that may negatively impact the defendant’s  ability to present a defense at trial and at which the presence of an attorney would  safe­guard the defendant  First Appearance o Following an arrest, a suspect’s initial appearance before a judge for the  determination of probable cause, to be informed of his or her rights, for decisions  to be made on pretrial release and bail, and for the appointment of an attorney (for indigents)  Indigent o An individual who is unable to afford a lawyer and who in entitled to the  appointment of a lawyer at a public cost  Ineffective Assistance of Counsel o Term to describe a lawyer’s performance that falls below the range of reasonably  effective competence and affects the outcome of the trial  Money Bail o Pretrial release of a defendant based on payment of a fixed amount of money  Presumption of Regularity o A court’s assumption that criminal justice decision makers acted in good faith  rather than out of a discriminatory intent  Preventive Detention o Holding of an individual without the option to post bail, used where defendant  pose a flight risk or a risk to the community  Pro Se o Latin for “on his or her own” o Individuals act pro se who represent themselves at trial  Probable Cause Hearing o A hearing to determine whether there is probable cause to detain a suspect  Release on Recognizance o Pretrial release based on a promise to appear for trial  Surety Bond o Bond posted by a bail bondsman indicating his or her promise to pay a  defendant’s bail in the event that the defendant does not appear for trial  Vindictive Prosecution o Prosecution in violation of the Due Process Clause pf the 5  and 14  th Amendments, which protect individuals who assert their constitutional or  statutory rights from retaliation on the form of having more serious charges  brought against them Chapter 13  Arraignment o The defendant is informed of the charges against him or her and is required to  enter a plea  Beyond A Reasonable Doubt o Each element of a criminal offense must be established beyond a reasonable doubt  Blockburger Test o Double jeopardy prohibits prosecuting individuals for the same criminal offenses  that have the same elements  Brady Rule o The prosecution is required to turn over exculpatory information to the accused  Burden of Proof o Prosecution must prove every element of a criminal charge beyond a reasonable  doubt  Case­In­Chief o The presentation of the prosecution’s evidence at trial  Challenge for Cause o A juror may be excluded from the jury based on an actual or presumed inability to impartially evaluate the evidence  Closing Argument o Summary of the evidence by the prosecutor and defense  Collateral Estoppel o A fact established in a trial is assumed to be established in other prosecutions  Compulsory Process Clause o 6  Amendment right to compel the appearance of witnesses  Confrontation Clause o Physical presentation of a suspect to a witness or victim  Cross­Examination o Questions regarding the direct testimony of a witness  Double Jeopardy o Prosecuting a defendant in the same jurisdiction on two occasions for the same  offense  Dual Sovereignty Doctrine o An individual may be prosecuted twice for the same offense by different  jurisdictions  Dynamite Charge o The judge instructs jurors who are in the minority to reconsider the  reasonableness of their views  Fair Cross Section Requirement o The jury must be selected from a group of individuals that fairly represents the  community  Hearsay o A witness’s testimony about what someone else said that is introduced to prove  the “truth” of a fact or facts  Hung Jury o  A jury unable to reach a verdict  Indictment o An accusation of criminal activity returned by a grand jury  Information o A document signed by a prosecutor charging an individual with a crime  Invited Response o A prosecutor’s closing statement that responds to a statement by the defense  attorney  Jury Instructions o A judge’s direction to the jury regarding the law  Jury Nullification o A jury’s refusal to follow the law and acquittal of a defendant  Jury Poll o A questioning of individual jurors whether they support the jury verdict  Key Man o Potential jurors are selected by a small group of individuals   Manifest Necessity o A mistrial based on the conclusion that public justice will not be served by  continuing the trial  Miscarriage o An individual may be subjected to a second trial despite the fact that jeopardy has  attached  Mistrial o A fundamental error that causes cancellation of a trial  Modified Indictment States o Four states require indictments for felonies punishable by capital punishment and  life imprisonment  Motion for a Judgement of Acquittal o Motion based on the contention that “no reasonable juror could conclude that guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt”.  No Bill o The grand jury refuses to indict an individual  Nolo Contendere o “no contest” o Requires the permission of the court o Plea is used when a defendant, while not admitting guilt, does not dispute the  charge  Opening Statement o The prosecutor and defense attorney each indicate at the beginning of the trial the  evidence they plan to introduce during the trial  Pattern Jury Instructions o Standard jury instructions  Peremptory Challenge o Removal of jurors without an obligation to state a reason  Petit Jury o The jury  Plea Bargain o Agreement to plead guilty in return for a reduction in charges or other  considerations  Preliminary Hearing o Determination whether a defendant should be bound over for trial  Presentment o A report filed by a grand jury with the court in criminal activity  Pretrial Motions o Motions filed before the beginning of a criminal trial  Purging the Grand Jury o Selecting the grand jury  Reasonable Doubt o The standard for a criminal conviction  Rebuttal o The defense case at trial  Recusal o Judge should remove himself or herself from a case on a conflict of interest or  bias  Rule of Exclusion o Substantial underrepresentation of a group on the jury venire  Speedy Trial th o 6  Amendment right to a trial without unreasonable delay  Subpoena Ad Testificandum o A court order to produce a tangible object  Subpoena Duces Tecum o A court order to produce documents  Transactional Immunity o Exemption from prosecution for any offense arising out of the act or transaction  that is the subject of a witness’s testimony  True Bill o Records the names of the grand jurors issuing an indictment  Use and Derivative Use Immunity o A witness may not be prosecuted based on information derived from his or her  testimony  Venire o Group of individuals from which the jury is selected  Venue o Location of the trial  Vicinage o Selection of the jury from the area in which the crime is committed  Voir Dire o Examination of potential jurors Chapter 14  Abandonment o Failure to file timely state appeal for post­conviction relief when an attorney has  dropped the case without notice to the defendant  Abuse of Writ Doctrine o Prohibition on filing successive writs of habeas corpus raising the same issue  Actual Innocence o A claim on a writ of habeas corpus that the defendant did not commit the crime  Automatic Reversal Rule o Requirement that violation of a fundamental constitutional right during trial  results in the reversal of a conviction on appeal  Capital Punishment o A death sentence  Cause and Prejudice o Exception that allows a defendant who defaulted on his or her appeal to file a writ of habeas corpus if he or she is able to demonstrate that the state caused the  default by withholding information or by some other misconduct or that the  default resulted from ineffective assistance of counsel  Clemency o A reduction in a criminal punishment  Collateral Remedies o Remedies that are available following the exhaustion of direct appeals  Concurrent Sentences o Criminal sentences served at the same time  Consecutive Sentences o Criminal sentences served one after another  Determining or Fixed­Time Sentencing o A fixed and certain criminal punishment  Eight Amendment o Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that includes the prohibition on cruel and  unusual punishment  Final Judgement Rule o Rule that an appeal may be taken only following a verdict  General Deterrence o Criminal penalty intended to discourage individuals from committing a crime  Habeas Corpus o Latin for “you have the body” o A writ of habeas corpus is an order issued by a judge to a government official  (usually the warden of a correctional institution) to bring an imprisoned individual to court and explain why the individual is in detention  Harmless Error o An error made in admission of evidence that does not contribute to the conviction  obtained o An appellate court must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error is  harmless  Incapacitation o Punishment intended to isolate the offender from society  Interlocutory Appeal o An appeal taken prior to the final verdict  Moot o An issue that is unnecessary for an appellate court to address  Non­weighing States o States in which the death penalty may be imposed once the jury finds an  aggravated circumstance and that the death penalty is justified based on the  totality of the circumstances  Pardon o A release from additional criminal punishment  Plain Error Exception o Exception that permits an appellate court to review an error that was not raised in  the trial court  Presentence Report o Report submitted to a judge by a probation officer containing facts that are  relevant for establishing a defendant’s criminal sentence  Rehabilitation o Punishment that is designed to assist an individual who is criminally convicted to  become a law­abiding and productive member of society   Restoration o Punishment that compensates the victim for losses resulting from crime  Retribution o Punishment that is intended to exact vengeance or revenge  Retroactivity of Judicial Decisions o Principle that a U.S. Supreme Court judgment should be retroactively applied to  all cases that are yet to be filed and cases that already have been filed  Right of Allocution o Right of the defendant to address the judge at a sentencing hearing  Selective Incapacitation o Punishment that singles out offenders who have committed designated offenses  for lengthy incarceration  Sentencing Guidelines o A formula established by a state legislature for determining criminal sentences  Sentencing Hearing o A judicial hearing to determine a defendant’s criminal sentence  Specific Deterrence o Punishment that is intended to deter a specific individual from committing  additional crimes  Successive Petition Doctrine o Rule prohibiting the file of a second habeas corpus that raises a claim that has  been presented in a prior petition  Three Strikes and You’re Out Law o Law requiring that three felonies result in lengthy imprisonment or life in prison  Weighing States o States in which a sentence of death is based on balancing aggravated and  mitigating circumstances Chapter 15  Administrative Review Board o Military officers who review decisions of combat status review tribunals  Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) o Congressional authorization for use of force  Combat Status Review Tribunal (CSRT) o A group of three neutral officers to the U.S. armed forces who are appointed by  the secretary of defense of the United States to determine whether a detainee is an unlawful combatant  Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 o Congressional act that provides that no person in the custody or under the  effective control of the Department of Defense shall be subjected to any treatment or technique of interrogation not authorized in the U.S. Army Field Manual on  Intelligence Interrogation  Enemy Combatant o An individual who, if captured in battle by the U.S. military forces, does not  qualify as a prisoner of war  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) o Congressional act that establishes procedures for national security electronic  surveillance and searches  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) o Special curt that issues warrants for electronic surveillance and physical searches  to investigate issues involving national security and terrorism  Material Witness Warrant o Warrant allowing the government to arrest a witness whose testimony is material  to a case and who may flee in order to avoid testifying  Military Commissions o Tribunals composed of military officers that are convened to prosecute  noncitizen, unlawful combatants  accused of terrorism  Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) o Congressional act establishing military commissions that are provided with  jurisdiction over any alien unlawful combatant who has engaged in hostilities r  has intentionally and materially supported hostilities against the United States  National Security Letter (NSL) o Letter issued by the attorney general of the United States requesting information  relevant to an investigation of terrorism or secret foreign intelligence activities  PATRIOT Act o Congressional act passed in October 2001 that provides procedures to combat  terrorism  Pen Register o Device that records the number of outgoing calls from an individual telephone  Roving Wiretap o Electronic surveillance authorized for any device used by the target of the  investigation  Sneak­and­Peek Search o A search that is not disclosed to the subject of the search  State Secrets Doctrine o Permits any U.S. government to intervene in any civil case and ask the judge to  prevent the presentation of evidence that would damage the security if the United  States  Trap­and­Trance Device o A device that records the number of call coming in to a telephone  Wall, The o A policy that prohibited communication between the FBI and CIA in regard to  national security and terrorism


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

50 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Anthony Lee UC Santa Barbara

"I bought an awesome study guide, which helped me get an A in my Math 34B class this quarter!"

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.