New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Professional Ethics, Notes Week 12 Part 1

by: Chloe Luyet

Professional Ethics, Notes Week 12 Part 1 PHI 1120, Professional Ethics

Marketplace > Wayne State University > PHIL-Philosophy > PHI 1120, Professional Ethics > Professional Ethics Notes Week 12 Part 1
Chloe Luyet

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

These are the notes that were taken in class on Tuesday, 4/5.
Professional Ethics
Dr. Ryan Fanselow
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Professional Ethics

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy

This 2 page Class Notes was uploaded by Chloe Luyet on Thursday April 7, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PHI 1120, Professional Ethics at Wayne State University taught by Dr. Ryan Fanselow in Winter 2016. Since its upload, it has received 29 views. For similar materials see Professional Ethics in PHIL-Philosophy at Wayne State University.

Similar to PHI 1120, Professional Ethics at WSU

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy


Reviews for Professional Ethics, Notes Week 12 Part 1


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 04/07/16
Reading Quiz  Donagan’s Thesis: o “Lawyers should sometimes break confidentiality even when there’s not a crime in progress” I. Beige and Armani Case a. PROS to breaking confidentiality i. give parents/families of victims peace of mind/closure ii. could’ve negotiated a different sentence for the client iii. waste of police resources b. PROS to keeping confidentiality th i. client has 5 Amendment right, and to reveal info would violate this ii. they’re already dead…the crime is completed 1. if the crime is in progress, lawyers should break confidentiality iii. it’s the job of the lawyer to keep confidentiality in order to do his/her job correctly (idea of role- differentiated behavior) c. Best for public: reveal; break confidentiality d. Best for client: don’t reveal; keep confidentiality e. Donagain says that there’s no “free pass “ for lawyers. If a regular person would be morally obligated to reveal certain information, then lawyers should also be obligated to reveal said information and break confidentiality! There is still such promises as confidentiality, however, II. Promises a. the argument: i. Lawyers promised to preserve confidentiality about the whereabouts of bodies, etc. ii. One must keep their promises iii. Therefore, lawyers should keep confidentiality about the whereabouts of bodies, etc. III. Self-Incrimination a. the argument: i. As an attorney, one acts as the client’s alter ego ii. One has a right against self-incrimination iii. Attorneys have a right to not reveal the whereabouts of bodies, etc. b. concept that, as a representative of the client, if an attorney reveals information about his/her client, he/she is also, in a sense, self-incriminating his//herself c. Donagan says that #2 premise confuses moral w/ legal rights. i. Sometimes, self-incrimination is better (morally, speaking). ii. You have a legal right to not confess to a crime, sure; however, you don’t have that moral right. Instead, your moral obligation is to confess to the crime! IV. Dignity a. the argument: i. Respecting the dignity of persons requires that lawyers be able to ascertain everything their clients know about the case ii. Lawyers can only learn everything their clients know if there’s confidentiality iii. Respecting the dignity of persons requires confidentiality b. flaws to argument: i. premise #2 is an exaggeration? There are probably more ways to obtain the information. c. Donagan’s Reply: i. Does respecting human dignity require a lawyer to be able to ascertain that his/her client is committing a crime? 1. If yes, then given premise #2, the argument is too generalized 2. If no, then premise #1 is false ii. EITHER the 1 premise is false or the argument proves too much, so the argument DOESN’T WORK!


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Jennifer McGill UCSF Med School

"Selling my MCAT study guides and notes has been a great source of side revenue while I'm in school. Some months I'm making over $500! Plus, it makes me happy knowing that I'm helping future med students with their MCAT."

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.