New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Philosophy Week 2 Texas State

by: Samantha Notetaker

Philosophy Week 2 Texas State PHIL 1305.287

Marketplace > Texas State University > PHIL-Philosophy > PHIL 1305.287 > Philosophy Week 2 Texas State
Samantha Notetaker
Texas State
GPA 4.0

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

These notes cover everything from the assigned reading of Berkeley's work, science vs. philosophy, and Berkeley's overall views. This also has the discussion points from class on the reading and as...
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
Ellen Bridge Stansell
Class Notes
philosophy, texas state, Berkeley, test tips, Argument Reconstruction
25 ?




Popular in Philosophy and Critical Thinking

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy

This 3 page Class Notes was uploaded by Samantha Notetaker on Tuesday January 26, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PHIL 1305.287 at Texas State University taught by Ellen Bridge Stansell in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 13 views. For similar materials see Philosophy and Critical Thinking in PHIL-Philosophy at Texas State University.

Similar to PHIL 1305.287 at Texas State


Reviews for Philosophy Week 2 Texas State


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 01/26/16
Key: Vocab Section Titles Lecture: Berkeley • Berkeley- recognizes there's a problem in appearance vs. reality. ⿞Questions he asks: ‣ Problem: Can we be sure what we see is what we get? ‣ Can we be sure there is a real world, based on our sense perceptions? • Berkeley should have said "we don't know". But he actually says, "No. There's no real world out there." He doesn't successfully make that argument, but on no one can really argue against him since we don't know either. ‣ Should we think our sense perceptions indicate a real world? ‣ Can we think our sense perceptions indicate the existence of physical objects? • We approach the initial questions in the same way that one would approach a scientific problem. Science and Philosophy often have a close relationship. Review: • What is the thought process that leads the philosopher to ask this philosophical question? (The question of 'can we be sure that our senses indicate a real world?'.) ⿞Everyone has different perceptions of the world around us. ⿞Can we be sure our perceptions tell us the nature of the world or the existence of the world? ⿞We are limited to experiencing the world through our own individual view of it. This is private, subjective, and causes us to wonder if, through our perceptions, do we actually have access to the real world? ⿞We can't control or perceive a lot things happening in the world around us Philosophy: Science: -starts with sense perceptions, -takes observed phenomenon and tries seeks to explain underlying reality that causes them. to explain using underlying causes. Berkeley's Views: • There is no real world. • There are no physical objects. • Human minds & the Creator (God) exist. • Real- ⿞(Berkeley's concept of real) ⿞adjective ⿞Definition: The state or quality of being Mind-independent (exists outside of our minds) ⿞Terms of Importance: Mind, World, Physical, Internal, External, Objects Mind World -Inside -Outside -Internal -External • Explanation of concept of 'real': Are Ghosts real? People see them, but are they mind- independent? Do they exist in the world outside of our so-called encounters. • Teacher Side note: Once you set up a basic definition of 'real' for the sake of this class, we can then use it to debate. (Like in basketball you have to establish basic boundary lines before you can play.) • Overall Summary: No physical reality, the only thing exists is minds. God is feeding us a flood of sense perceptions, which is why we see the same things. (like the matrix) Berkeley successfully gives more than one argument for his view. (we should try to emulate this). Berkeley Reading: Section 18: (homework reconstruct 18 & 19, needs to be hard copy) My Version: P1. We can either prove the existence of ideas through sense perceptions or reason. P2. Senses are limited to our perceptions, which would limit our ideas. P3. Therefore, if it were possible to prove this existence, it would have to be through reason. P4. We can have ideas without reason, therefore there isn't necessary to create them. P5. We can have ideas without bodies to resemble them. C. What we perceive externally through sense and reason is not necessary for the production of ideas. Teacher feedback: while my answer is not exactly what she got, it is not wrong. Just a different analysis and conclusion. It wouldn't be marked off on a test. Teacher Version: P1. If material objects exist outside of our mind we can only know through sense or reason. P2. We can only know our senses through sensations. P3. We cannot know, through our senses, if objects can exist outside of our minds. P4. Dreams show that we can ideas of objects outside of what exists in reality. P5. We can have ideas that are not from material objects. P6. All our ideas could be not caused by objects. P7:We don't need objects to produce ideas P8: Therefore, we cannot say that objects exist based off of how we perceive them because perception itself is just an idea. An idea of an object doesn't mean the object exists that way in the real world. P9: We cannot know that objects exist through reason because of this. C: If objects do exist, we cannot know for sure. Test TIP: Test question: describe Berkeley's view on the world being real and provide 1 argument. Did you remember at least one argument and can you walk through it in your own words? Doesn't have to be in premises form. Use of Reason- either we sense them and we know it, or we sense it and use our minds to perceive them as an object. Taking sensory input and using reason about it. Summary of thoughts: ⿞Senses cannot help us to realize the reality of external senses. ⿞Focusing on Dreams, what is one interpretation of what he is saying about them in relation to our ideas? "we can have ideas without bodies to resemble them or correspond to them" ⿞Berkeley's arguments are largely impossible to refute, which is why we still study him today. ⿞Shows us that either we can perceive these objects through reason or senses, and since neither of those work-nothing can prove them. ⿞Maybe reason works for us as smoke does. We see smoke on a hill and infer there is a fire even though we couldn't actually see the fire itself. ‣ We use reason to infer, not as irrefutable proof, its still a subjective impression. We may never experience the external object directly, but we can't infer off of this basis because it is flawed. ‣ Reason can't take us there. Paragraph 19: • My Version ⿞Teacher Version ⿞ • P1:It is possible/could be possible for external bodies to create ideas in our minds. ⿞P1: We can have ideas without the existence of objects • P2: Since our minds give outside things their substance, they cannot claim these materials create ideas themselves. ⿞P2: But some say that our ideas can be explained because there are objects to resemble our ideas. • P3: We don't know how objects are created outside of our minds. ⿞P3: This explanation states that these objects can effect our mind. • P4: Therefore, the creation of ideas outside our minds cannot be proved. ⿞P4: We can't understand the effect physical things have on our minds or how it is possible. • P5: So if materials did exist outside of the mind, it would have to have been created by something outside of ourselves (a divine being). ⿞P5: Mental and physical objects are different (private vs. public, subjective vs. objective, mind-dependent vs. mind-independent. P6: Our ideas are still unexplainable if they are mind-independent objects. P7: Therefore, it doesn't make sense to believe in objects outside of our minds because that then means we are then explaining how we have the ideas that we do. • C: Ideas outside of our minds creation did actually exist, they cannot serve a purpose. ⿞C: Therefore, we should not believe in mind-independent objects. Summary of Thoughts: • The Key concept of this is explanation (explanatory power) • TEST INFO: If your premises are mostly hitting on the main points and your conclusion is correct you get a 100, but if you get the conclusion off, it is up to interpretation of the teacher. • TEST INFO: Because, since, ect. should not be in the conclusion


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Allison Fischer University of Alabama

"I signed up to be an Elite Notetaker with 2 of my sorority sisters this semester. We just posted our notes weekly and were each making over $600 per month. I LOVE StudySoup!"

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.