Class Note for ECON 431 at UA
Popular in Course
Popular in Department
This 4 page Class Notes was uploaded by an elite notetaker on Friday February 6, 2015. The Class Notes belongs to a course at University of Arizona taught by a professor in Fall. Since its upload, it has received 15 views.
Reviews for Class Note for ECON 431 at UA
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 02/06/15
Simpli ed Football A TwoStage Game with a MixedStrategy Equilibrium by Avinash Dixit and Susan Skeath In football when the offense needs to gain 20 yards and has two plays to do it commentators often discuss whether it is better to try for the whole lot in one play or go for half the distance each time We show you how to think through this and how to startle your friends with your insight Suppose the offense has two more plays left labeled the third down and the fourth down to gain 20 yards in which case it wins otherwise it loses The offense s coach has two plays for this situation one that will cover 10 yards if successful the other 20 The opposing coach knowing this can set his defense to cover either The offense s probabilities of success for the possible combinations of the two sides choices in any single down are shown in Figure 1 This is not the payoff matrix of the game itself The payoffs for the ultimate outcomes are as follows if the offense wins it gets 1 if it loses it gets 0 This is a zero sum game Figure 1 Success DrobabilitV table in two DIaV football example Defense 10 20 Offense 10 45 1 20 1 1 2 As usual we solve this game backward Begin by considering the fourth down This may occur with either 10 or 20 yards to go depending on what happened on the earlier third down We have to consider these two cases separately First we look at the case where 20 yards are needed at the 4th down Here the offense loses the game even if it successfully completes the 10 yard play Therefore it is forced to use the 20 yard play The defense knowing this uses the 20 yard defense The payoff to the offense is 12 Technically the payoff table for the offense is as shown in Figure 2 This game is dominance solvable and the equilibrium is 2020 leading to an expected payoff of 12 for the offense as we just argued Figure 2 Payoff table for fourth down 20 yards to go Defense 10 20 Offense 10 0 0 20 1 1 2 Next consider the case where only 10 yards are needed on the 4th down Now either successful play wins the game for the offense Therefore its payoff equals its probability of success The payoff table is shown in Figure 3 Figure 3 PaVoff table for fourth down 10 vards to go Defense 10 20 Offense 10 45 1 20 1 1 2 In this payoff table there is no dominance for either pure strategy nor a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies so we look for a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium If the offense mixes in proportions of p for the 10 yard play and 1 p for the 20 yard play the condition for the defense to be indifferent between its two plays is 08 p 1 p p 05 1 p or 1 02 p 05 05 p or 07 p 05 which yields p 57 Similarly the defense s equilibrium mix has the probability q 57 of choosing to cover the 10 yard play The resulting expected payoff to the offense can be found by evaluating the result of the offense s p mix when played against either of the defense s pure strategies say its 10 yard play This gives 1 575 1 17 67 A more complicated way to get the same payoff is to calculate the average of all four possible strategy combinations using the right combined probabilities of their occurrence when both players mix 575745 57271 27571 272712 4249 67 Now consider the third down Here we need to trace the consequences of each pair of choices For example if each side uses the 10 yard move then i with probability 45 the offense succeeds gains 10 yards and then on the 4th down with 10 to go it has the expected payoff of 67 calculated above and ii with probability 15 the offense fails is left with 4th down and 20 and has the expected payoff of calculated above Therefore 1010 yields the expected payoff 4567 1512 5570 1114 to the offense Similarly 1020 yields 1 67 67 2010 yields 1 and 2020 yields 12 1 1212 34 Using all these calculations we have the payoff table for the third down shown in Figure 4 Figure 4 Payoff table for third down Defense 10 20 Offense 10 1114 67 20 1 34 This table shows no dominance and we look for a mixed strategy equilibrium We find the offense s p mix by the usual condition 1114 p 1 p 67 p 34 1 p or 1 3p14 34 3p28 which yields 14 9p28 or p 79 Similarly for the defense s mixture 12 q14 3q4 yields 328 2 18 q56 or q 13 The expected payoff to the offense is 56 If the numbers in the initially specified table of success probabilities were different these mixture probabilities and payoffs would also be different But three general points stand out from the analysis First neither of the sports commentators doctrines take two stabs at 20quot nor go for half the distance each time is appropriate as a pure strategy mixing remains useful for the usual reason in zero sum games namely that any other consistent pattern would be exploited by the opponent Second in the 3rd down mix the offense s probability of choosing the 10 yard play is quite high There are two different ways of looking at this i The 10 yard play is safer it is the percentage play in the sense that we saw in Chapter 5 its payoffs against the defense s choices are closer together than those of the 20 yard play 67 1114 114 while 1 34 14 ii The defense covers the 20 yard play 23 of the time because losing it is very costly to the defense Therefore the offense uses the less covered 10 yard play more often And third with two plays an added point in favor of the 10 yard play on the 3rd down is that if it succeeds then you get the advantage of being able to mix and keep the defense guessing on the 4th down If you try the 20 yard play on 3rd down and fail then you are forced to go for 20 on the 4th and the defense can cover this Hence the greater weight on the 10 yard play on 3rd down as compared to 4th and 10 79 gt 57
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'