New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

SOC 3111 Week 3

by: Danielle Notetaker

SOC 3111 Week 3 SOC 3111

Danielle Notetaker
The U
GPA 3.4

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

Notes for Week 3 - Research Methods
Research Methods
Michael Timberlake
Class Notes
SOC 3111, sociology, research methods, week 3
25 ?




Popular in Research Methods

Popular in Sociology

This 3 page Class Notes was uploaded by Danielle Notetaker on Saturday February 6, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to SOC 3111 at University of Utah taught by Michael Timberlake in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 44 views. For similar materials see Research Methods in Sociology at University of Utah.

Similar to SOC 3111 at The U


Reviews for SOC 3111 Week 3


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 02/06/16
Research Methods – Week 3 January 15 , 2016 Chapter 3 – Research Ethics  Introduction o Each social scientist needs to consider how to practice their discipline ethically o When we interact with people as social scientists, we must give paramount importance to the rational concerns and emotional needs that will shape their responses to our actions o Ethical research practice begins here  With the recognition that our research procedures involve people who deserve as much respect for their well-being as we do ours  Historical Background o Formal procedures for protection of research participants grew out of widely publicized abuses  The Nuremberg War Crime Trials and Hitler’s experiments  The Tuskgee syphilis experiments in the 1930’s  Out of these and other experiments that violated human rights, the United States created a National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research  Ethics o Three basic ethical principles for the protection of human subjects were established  Respect for persons  Treating persons as autonomous agents and protecting those with diminished autonomy  Beneficence  Minimizing possible harms and maximizing benefits  Justice  Distributing benefits and risks of research fairly o Federal regulations require that every institution seeking federal funding for biomedical or behavioral research on human subjects have an institutional review board(IRB) that reviews all research proposals  IRBs at universities and other agencies apply ethics standards that are set by federal regulations but can be expanded or specified by the IRB itself o American Sociological Association (ASA)  Has adopted, for practicing sociologists, ethics guidelines that are more specific than the federal regulations  Professional organizations may also review complaints of unethical practices when asked   Complete text of the Code  Ethical Principles o 1. Achieving Valid Results  Commitment to achieving valid results is the necessary starting point for ethical research practice o 2. Honesty and Openness  The scientific concern with validity requires that scientists be open in disclosing their methods and honest in presenting their findings o 3. Protecting Research Participants  The code’s standards concerning the treatment of human subjects include federal regulations and ethics guidelines emphasized by most professional social science organizations  Research should cause no harm to subjects  Participation in research should be voluntary, and therefore subjects must give their informed consent to participate in the research  Researchers should fully disclose their identity  Anonymity or confidentiality must be maintained for individual research participants unless it is voluntarily and explicitly waived  Benefits from a research project should outweigh any foreseeable risks o 4. Avoid Harming Research Participants  This standard may seem straightforward, but it can be difficult to interpret in specific cases and harder yet to define in a way agreeable to all social scientists  Does it mean that subjects should not be at all harmed psychologically as well as physically?  That they should feel no anxiety or distress whatever during the study or only after their involvement ends? o 5. Obtain Informed Consent  To be informed, consent must be given by persons who are competent to consent, have consented voluntarily, are fully informed about the research, and have comprehended what they have been told o 6. Avoid deception in research, except in limited circumstances  Deception occurs when subjects are misled about research procedure to determine how they would react to the treatment if they were not research subjects o 7. Maintain privacy and confidentiality  Procedures to protect each subject’s privacy such as locking records and creating special identifying codes must be created to minimize the risk of access by unauthorized persons  The Uses of Research o Scientists must also consider the uses to which their research is put o Although many believe that personal values should be left outside the laboratory, some feel that it is proper for scientists to concern themselves with the way their research is used  Conclusions o The extent to which ethical issues are a problem for researchers and their subjects varies dramatically with the type of research design o Survey research, in particular, creates few ethical problems o Some experimental studies in the social sciences that have put people in uncomfortable or embarrassing situations have generated vociferous complaints and years of debate about ethics  Ultimately these decisions about ethical procedures are not just up to the researcher to make  The University’s IRB sets the human subjects protection standards for your institution and may even require that you submit your research proposal for them to review  It is important to review the human subjects guidelines of the ASA or other professional association in the fields, consult university procedures for the conduct of research with human subjects and then proceed accordingly


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Jennifer McGill UCSF Med School

"Selling my MCAT study guides and notes has been a great source of side revenue while I'm in school. Some months I'm making over $500! Plus, it makes me happy knowing that I'm helping future med students with their MCAT."

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.