REUPLOADED Notes Week 12, Professional Ethics
REUPLOADED Notes Week 12, Professional Ethics PHI 1120, Professional Ethics
Popular in Professional Ethics
PHI 1120, Professional Ethics
verified elite notetaker
Popular in PHIL-Philosophy
verified elite notetaker
This 4 page Class Notes was uploaded by Chloe Luyet on Tuesday April 12, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PHI 1120, Professional Ethics at Wayne State University taught by Dr. Ryan Fanselow in Winter 2016. Since its upload, it has received 42 views. For similar materials see Professional Ethics in PHIL-Philosophy at Wayne State University.
Reviews for REUPLOADED Notes Week 12, Professional Ethics
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 04/12/16
Reading Quiz Donagan’s Thesis: o “Lawyers should sometimes break confidentiality even when there’s not a crime in progress” I. Beige and Armani Case a. PROS to breaking confidentiality i. give parents/families of victims peace of mind/closure ii. could’ve negotiated a different sentence for the client iii. waste of police resources b. PROS to keeping confidentiality th i. client has 5 Amendment right, and to reveal info would violate this ii. they’re already dead…the crime is completed 1. if the crime is in progress, lawyers should break confidentiality iii. it’s the job of the lawyer to keep confidentiality in order to do his/her job correctly (idea of role- differentiated behavior) c. Best for public: reveal; break confidentiality d. Best for client: don’t reveal; keep confidentiality e. Donagain says that there’s no “free pass “ for lawyers. If a regular person would be morally obligated to reveal certain information, then lawyers should also be obligated to reveal said information and break confidentiality! There is still such promises as confidentiality, however, II. Promises a. the argument: i. Lawyers promised to preserve confidentiality about the whereabouts of bodies, etc. ii. One must keep their promises iii. Therefore, lawyers should keep confidentiality about the whereabouts of bodies, etc. III. Self-Incrimination a. the argument: i. As an attorney, one acts as the client’s alter ego ii. One has a right against self-incrimination iii. Attorneys have a right to not reveal the whereabouts of bodies, etc. b. concept that, as a representative of the client, if an attorney reveals information about his/her client, he/she is also, in a sense, self-incriminating his//herself c. Donagan says that #2 premise confuses moral w/ legal rights. i. Sometimes, self-incrimination is better (morally, speaking). ii. You have a legal right to not confess to a crime, sure; however, you don’t have that moral right. Instead, your moral obligation is to confess to the crime! IV. Dignity a. the argument: i. Respecting the dignity of persons requires that lawyers be able to ascertain everything their clients know about the case ii. Lawyers can only learn everything their clients know if there’s confidentiality iii. Respecting the dignity of persons requires confidentiality b. flaws to argument: i. premise #2 is an exaggeration? There are probably more ways to obtain the information. c. Donagan’s Reply: i. Does respecting human dignity require a lawyer to be able to ascertain that his/her client is committing a crime? 1. If yes, then given premise #2, the argument is too generalized 2. If no, then premise #1 is false ii. EITHER the 1 premise is false or the argument proves too much, so the argument DOESN’T WORK! I. Whistleblowing a. a certain type of action b. revealing of previously unknown information about an organization’s current practices c. done by a certain type of person i. a member of the organization d. done in certain circumstances i. when the organization’s practices are wrong/harmful to the general public 1. EX/ a. a reporter reporting info about an organization engaging in harmful behavior is not whistleblowing b. sharing already widely-known info about my company’s harmful practices is not whistleblowing c. sharing info about harmful practices my company did years ago is not whistleblowing d. if I reveal info that my organization is currently engaged in harmful practices to get famous, it is whistleblowing i. the motivation for the whistleblowing on the behalf of the whilstleblower is not relevant to the definition e. Engineers Codes i. evolution 1. 1912 – an engineer should consider the protection of a client or employer’s interest first in professional obligations a. disapproves of whistleblowing 2. 1947 a. weighs the interest of the general public and the employer equally…Makes whistleblowing a Prima Facie duty 3. 1974 – an engineer should hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public a. favors whistleblowing f. Whistleblowers not only often lose their jobs, but have trouble finding a new one b/c of their previous disloyalty. Companies do not want to hire someone who is “disloyal” even if for the right reasons g. EX/ Ford Pinto – Frank Camps (an engineer) worried (correctly) that the Pinto had an unsafe windshield and a gas tank that would explode upon impact. So, he went to his boss, who refused to do anything about it and fired Camps instead. HE DID WRONG HE DID RIGHT 1) He didn’t save any lives or 1) Takes a hit to the Ford PR change anything and they couldn’t cover up 2) He owes some kind of what they did loyalty to his company 2) He did everything he could first (went through manager/proper chain of command) before taking it publically – IMPORTANT to try internal resolution before whistleblowing h. EX/ Joseph Rose was a lawyer. The organization he worked for was making illegal payments to Nixon’s reelection campaign. He went to the board of directors and ended up fired. Ends up writing later that “white collar” crime is not really important to companies/society as a whole as long as it yields a profit i. PROS TO WHISTLEBLOWING i. Protects society ii. Can protect the workers/employees j. Loyalty to a company has to be a “Prima Facie” duty i. certain things, in particular Prima Facie Duties, require justification. If you don’t have a good reason for whistleblowing, people aren’t going to agree w/ you k. 2 MAIN REASONS TO NOT WHISTLEBLOW: i. Loyalty to employer ii. Risks you take to yourself (the stability/security of your own job) iii. ALSO: must take into consideration what the general public is going to do w/ the information you whistleblow. It could put others at risk w/ the information out there and how much would the public actually profit from the info?
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'