New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Intro to Social Psych Notes

by: Lauren Notetaker

Intro to Social Psych Notes PSYC 3430 - 03

Marketplace > Tulane University > Psychlogy > PSYC 3430 - 03 > Intro to Social Psych Notes
Lauren Notetaker
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
GPA 4.0

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

these notes cover april 12 and 14
Intro To Social Psych
O'Brien, Laurie
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Intro To Social Psych

Popular in Psychlogy

This 6 page Class Notes was uploaded by Lauren Notetaker on Saturday April 16, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PSYC 3430 - 03 at Tulane University taught by O'Brien, Laurie in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 21 views. For similar materials see Intro To Social Psych in Psychlogy at Tulane University.


Reviews for Intro to Social Psych Notes


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 04/16/16
Social psych and the law   The risk of false confession • Project nnocence is an organization that works to free wrongfully convicted indivudals • Among prisoners convicted and later proved innocent by DNA evidence, what percetnage do you think had given false confessions? ◦ 20-25% • Sometimes ppl confess as an act of compliance • Sometimes ppl are conviced that they actually committed the crime; private acceptance ◦ Suspects who lack a clear memory of the event ◦ When false evidence is presented • Pp chart ◦ No one actually pushed the button they weren't supposed to touch ◦ When there's a false witness, numbers are highest, especially when the person is doing it fast The lie detector test • Many ppl confess after being otld they have failed a polygraph • The assumption: when ppl lie, become anxious in ways that can b measured • 80-90% accurate • Truthful ppl can fail • The test can be faked     Eyewitnesses are powerful (loftus 1974) • Pp chart • Discredited eyewitness and eyewitness had equal power   How accurate is eyewitness testimony • Buckhout (1974) study of accuracy: ◦ An assault on a professor was staged ◦ 7 weeks later, 60% of witnesses identified the wrong person • Eyewitnesses are often more confident than correct   Why is eyewitness memory faulty? • The misinformation effect - incorporating "misinformation" into one's memory of an even after receiving misleading info • Memory constructioni (loftus 78) ◦ Ps show series of slides • Pic of blue car at a stop sign or a yield • Do ppl have an accurate memory for seeing stop or yield? • Misleading questions • Identified which slide they saw • 59% asked misleading question answered wrong • Retelling events commits people to their memory • Feedback to witnesses increases confidence   What can be done to reduce error? • Train police interviewers ◦ Don’t interrupt witness ◦ Have witness visualize the scene ◦ Don’t allow leading questions • Minimize false lineup identficaitons ◦ Accurate identifications are automatic and effortless ◦ Screen out ppl who make false IDs ◦ Ppl do best looking at pics one at a time   What other factors influence juror judgements? • The defendant's characteristics ◦ Physical attractivness ◦ Similarity to jurors ◦ Race/ethnicity ◦ Ppl are more likely to recommend ablack person for death penality • Phenotypical characteristics - most likely • The judge's instructions ◦ Difficult for jurors to ignore inadmissible evidence   What influences the individual juror? • Juror comprehension ◦ Understanding instructions ◦ Understanding statistical info • Expert testimonies ◦ Increasing juror's understanding   Scientific jury selection • Preimptery challenge - attornies can say they don’t want a certain perosn on the jury • A method of selecting juries thorugh surveys that yield correlations bt demographics and trial relevant attitudes • The case against the Harrisburg Seven (73) ◦ Stron gevidence ◦ Trial in a conservative city ◦ A sociologist surveyed community • Demogrphic varibles • Attitudes ◦ Trial ended in a hung jury   Death qualificaiton • A jury selection procedure sued in capital cases that permits judges to exclude prospective jurors who say they would not vote for the death penality • Death penalty supporters ◦ More concerned about crim ◦ Trustful of police ◦ More cynical of defense lawyers ◦ Less tolerant of procedures to protect the accused • Capital case- case where defednent is eligible for death penality if found guilty; can exclude ppl on jury if they wouldn’t want to decide • Death qualified jurors more likely to vote guilty • Death qualification qustions can impact juries • Mock juries ◦ Askign perspective jurors death qualification questions makes them more likely to vote quilty   The death penality and jsutice • Public attitudes support the prevailing practice ◦ In us, most support it ◦ In ocuntries where it is banned, most oppose it • Death penalty is applied inconsistently   Juries and gorup influence • Minority influence ◦ Rare ◦ Must be consistnet, eprsisten, and self confident ◦ High status male jurors tend to be influential • Group polarization • Leniency bias ◦ Juries are more likely to air on leniency • Don’t have to have 12 ppl on juries • More likely to have dissent in 12 person juries • Smaller juries less likely to represent minority segments of the pop • Smaller are moere likely to reach a unanimous verdict   Less than unanimous juries • Supreme court has upheald less than un decisions • Mock jury study (hastie 98) ◦ Juries t ◦ PP Effects of crowding   Crowding and perceived control • Get ppl to solve puzzles in different environments • It can effect our cog abilites, motivation and persistence • Tried to solve most puzzles when not crowded at all • Percieved control - reminded they could leave room at any time   Noise as a stressor • Stressful when we feel we cant control the noise or make it stop • Looked at percentage of errors in problem solving • No one actually pressed the button but had knowledge that if they did itd go away   Opinions on climate science • What percentage of climate scientists thinking global warming is caused by humans? ◦ 97% • What % of americans? ◦ 52% ◦ These differ from textbook   Overshooting the earth carrying capacity • Ppl make more money they buy more stuff - consumption • Consumption contributes to global warming   Enabling sustainable lifestyles • Providing women with education reduces number of babies they have   How can we get people to reduce consumption? • Conserving water (dickerson 92) ◦ Manipulation • Questionnaire about own water use • Asked to sign poster advocating conservation • Hypocrisy condition: ▪ ? + poster ▪ Creates cognitive dissonance ◦ Ppl in hypocrisy saved most water   Wealth and well being • Does economic growth improve human morale ◦ No relation   Why does materialism fail to satisfy? • Doesn't make you happier in long run • Adaptation level phenomenon - Can apply to temp in room not just money   Satisfaction with life and adaption (brickman 78) • Difference bt a winner and non winner wasn’t significant   Social psych and reduced consumption • Downward social comparison study ◦ I wish - upward; not as happy ◦ Im glad im not - downward; happier


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Anthony Lee UC Santa Barbara

"I bought an awesome study guide, which helped me get an A in my Math 34B class this quarter!"

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.