soc 102-C Wright Mills
soc 102-C Wright Mills SOC 102
Popular in Contemporary Sociological Theory
Popular in Sociology
verified elite notetaker
This 2 page Class Notes was uploaded by Freddie816 on Thursday April 21, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to SOC 102 at University of California - Los Angeles taught by Jepson in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 25 views. For similar materials see Contemporary Sociological Theory in Sociology at University of California - Los Angeles.
Reviews for soc 102-C Wright Mills
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 04/21/16
4/19/16 ● C. Wright mills and conflict theorythe power elite model ○ Mills went completely against Parsons theory on functionalism and focused more on Weber’s theory of MPP to develop his theory. Mills asked the main question of who holds the power in society? He came up with the power elite model. He argued that society is governed by a small number of unelected officials who make all the major decisions in our society: he refers to this group of elites as the triangle of power: ■ Military segment (made up of 5 star generals) ■ Economic segment (made up of corporate CEOs from the largest corporations) ■ Political segment (president and highest ranking officials in the executive branch) ● Note that Congress is not in the triangle of powersthese are elected officials, the power elite is not elected ○ Mills argues that the unity of the power elite is reinforced through social and cultural ties, such as throuintermarriage (elites marry elites), kin, religion (evangelical christianity), and a similar educational background ○ Exchange of members: interlocking directorates (revolving door) ■ Robert shells and iron arm oligarchy (mill’s student) ● Democracy is basically screwed ● Oligarchy rules and is controlled by a few ○ Furthermore, Mills argued that the power elite was a historical creation that gained power through a series of political events i.ewar. Mills demonstrates this through the organization of society before and after the war. Before the war: ■ The federal government was small and irrelevant to the people ■ The military was weak ■ No one individual occupied too much power ○ After the war: ■ Government began intervening more and more into people’s lives ■ The military expanded ■ US became a “lone superpower” ○ Thus, as a historical construction, the power elite can be challenged and resisted by the forces of democracy (the people). Mills argued that there is thus still hope. (attempts to warn society) ● Overview ○ Mills rejected Parsons theory of structural functionalism, not every structure in society serves a larger purpose of helping the economy/not everyone works in harmony (structures are not all functional) ○ Not all structures in society are necessary and legitimate ○ Emphasized conflict, exploitation and inequality ○ Power is held by a few (elite)/triangle of power whose interests are what govern society (not the values of the people) 4/19/16 ■ The power elite does not care about greater social issues such as gay marriage ■ Labor unions are almost nonexistent ○ Sociologists should apply their research and fight for a greater cause (activism)
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'