New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Intro to Ethics Notes (Utilitarianism)

by: Julian Torian

Intro to Ethics Notes (Utilitarianism) PHIL 160

Marketplace > Kansas > PHIL-Philosophy > PHIL 160 > Intro to Ethics Notes Utilitarianism
Julian Torian
GPA 3.0
Introduction to Ethics
Ben Eggleston

Almost Ready


These notes were just uploaded, and will be ready to view shortly.

Purchase these notes here, or revisit this page.

Either way, we'll remind you when they're ready :)

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

This is a summery of this weeks notes on Utilitarianism and how it relates to Ethical Egoism.
Introduction to Ethics
Ben Eggleston
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Introduction to Ethics

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy

This 5 page Class Notes was uploaded by Julian Torian on Saturday March 7, 2015. The Class Notes belongs to PHIL 160 at Kansas taught by Ben Eggleston in Spring2015. Since its upload, it has received 139 views. For similar materials see Introduction to Ethics in PHIL-Philosophy at Kansas.

Similar to PHIL 160 at KU

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy


Reviews for Intro to Ethics Notes (Utilitarianism)


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 03/07/15
PHIL 160 Notes 3234 Utilitarianism lof2 De nition of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is the theory that an action is right if and only if it results in at least as much wellbeing as any alternative action It is often associated with this phrase The greatest happiness of the greatest number 0 Problem with this phrase is that Utilitarianism is just concerned with the greatest happiness and no information is provided with the latter part of the phrase To choose among several possible acts 0 Imagine a world that would result from each act 0 Imagine how much wellbeing there is in that alternate world the world with the most wellbeing is the best 0 The act that leads to that world is right any other act is wrong Key elements of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a consequentialist view morality of actions depend entirely on its consequences o It is also a Welfarefocused view it says that welfare or wellbeing is the only good Other good things are only good in that they promote wellbeing Utilitarianism is impartial Wellbeing is good and worth promoting no matter who experiences it Ethical Egoism is NOT impartial History of Utilitarianism 0 Name comes from the word 39Utility where utility is another word for someone s wellbeing so the name re ects the theory s focus on wellbeing Utilitarianism arose in 17th century England but not systematically articulated until the 18th century SinceJohn Stuart Mill author of On Liberty 1859 developed the view in his Utilitarianism 1861 it has become one of the most prominent ethical theories How it works Utilitarianism generally condemns certain actions murder theft rape etc because of their effects on wellbeing the decreases of wellbeing almost always greater than increases Moral vocabulary associated with Utilitarianism include o Sanctity of life 0 Natural rights 0 Autonomy o Dignity Utilitarianism says these are not really fundamental moral concepts Morality is just about maximizing wellbeing Utilitarianism opposes most forms of discrimination race religion sexual orientation etc This stance comes from weighing the decreases in well being people being harmed by this discrimination vs the increases in wellbeing people bene ting from these discriminations Utilitarianism condemns Utility the bene t someone gets from something Marginal Utility the bene t someone gets from an extra or additional increment of something Diminishing Marginal Utility when successive ahlthinnal i nnnnn nnI nF most of our current methods of using nonhuman animals as sources of food factory farming of chickens cows etc This stance comes from weighing the decreases in the wellbeing of the nonhuman animals vs the increases in the wellbeing of the humans who eat them Utilitarianism 20f2 The Calculation Objection Objection How is it possible to gure out and compare the consequences of all of one s options 0 Response Utilitarianism is not especially obligated to answer this objection since virtually all approaches to morality agree that acts consequences often matter We Human Beings have plenty of experience guring out the consequences of possible actions We can also imagine ourselves in other people s situations walk in another man s shoes Humans and Nonhuman Animals Objection 0 Response it is true that utilitarianism holds that species membership does not matter Any pain felt by any organism is bad 0 Utilitarianism does not deny that human beings are more complex than other animals and have distinct needs when it comes to their physical and psychological wellbeing Sanctity of Life Utilitarianism does not recognize the sanctity of life 0 Utilitarianism holds that what matters is not being alive per se but what a person or animal is capable of experiencing Demandingness Isn39t utilitarianism implausible because it requires people to make sacri ces that while possibly admirable are not morally required Ex donating money organs etc o Utilitarianism recognizes that it would not promote wellbeing in the long run for people to abandon their careers family commitments etc 0 However it does maintain that people are morally required to make much greater sacri ces than people typically think are morally required The Transplant Case Objection Doesn t utilitarianism require immoral actions by requiring the doctor to do the transplant in the hypothetical transplant case 0 In real life a policy of doctors killing healthy people in order to take their organs is likely to have very bad consequences aside from the good consequences of the lives saved consequentialism Not just the Normative Ethics What makes an act rinkF Ethical Egoism Your happiness consequences Consequentialis Utilitarianism E Everyone s 39 happiness


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Kyle Maynard Purdue

"When you're taking detailed notes and trying to help everyone else out in the class, it really helps you learn and understand the I made $280 on my first study guide!"

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.