New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

In class weekly notes Ethics

by: Megan Hansel

In class weekly notes Ethics PHIL 160

Marketplace > Kansas > PHIL-Philosophy > PHIL 160 > In class weekly notes Ethics
Megan Hansel
GPA 3.78

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

April 25th-27th
Introduction to Ethics
Lara Giordano
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Introduction to Ethics

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy

This 3 page Class Notes was uploaded by Megan Hansel on Saturday April 30, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PHIL 160 at Kansas taught by Lara Giordano in Winter 2016. Since its upload, it has received 18 views. For similar materials see Introduction to Ethics in PHIL-Philosophy at Kansas.

Similar to PHIL 160 at KU

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy


Reviews for In class weekly notes Ethics


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 04/30/16
April 27 2016 Intro to Ethics Singer= modified Utilitarianism Singer’s Conclusion:  We are obligated to give to where we are reduced to subsistence level  Duty and charity can’t be maintained  We need to give the money away and if we don’t it is wrong  WE LIVE WITH THE WRONG MORAL VALUES Counter Argument:  It is too drastic revision of our moral scheme…. People couldn’t actually do this without a backlash or a moral break down o Singers reply:  Requires “too much” = descriptive claim that has no effect on the moral rightness of what Singer’s conclusion  If we come to live in society where it is common for people to give away a lot of their income, then it will become normal  Utilitarian understanding would make us donate our lives or money to service others in need o Singer’s reply:  Yes, this is asking us to devote out life to service but that isn’t a moral conflict  Famine relief= government’s job  If the citizen’s give their life to service, then the government will stop giving help to famine relief Ethics April 25 2016 Peter Singer:  1970 Bhola Cyclone o “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”  written in 1971  Money= morality o How much money is used to help others shows how moral one is or how much someone cares  Can we justify how we live perfectly fine everyday while others are starving and dying at the same time? o No we cannot justify them, we need to change in order to be moral. 2 fundamental assumptions:  “I begin with the assumption that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad” (page 270) o This isn’t contradicting or wrong according to the majority of people  “If it is our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (page 270) (2 principles) Compared to Utilitarianism:  It isn’t asking us to create the maximum amount of happiness or do anything that could hurt us morally… he is just asking us to do what we can when we can Notes about this theory:  Physical or geographic location of those suffering definitely play a part in our feeling of need to help, however this has no moral significance Argument 3:  If I am aware of a bad situation and am knowledgeable of what would count as help, then it doesn’t matter how close or distant this is to me  Because of technology, we live in a “global village” and are knowledgeable of instances of famine and suffering take place half-way around the world  What other people are doing shouldn’t effect if you should do something or not o If someone was in trouble and no one was helping him doesn’t mean you shouldn’t help Argument 4:  Not everyone will give 5 dollars so you should give more than 5 dollars Counter argument for premise 4:  If too much money is given from people then the tables will turn so those in poverty may not be in poverty anymore but now those who gave money are suffering due to giving their money away


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Anthony Lee UC Santa Barbara

"I bought an awesome study guide, which helped me get an A in my Math 34B class this quarter!"

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.