New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Psych 2300: Chapter 8 Notes

by: MadsSwart

Psych 2300: Chapter 8 Notes Psych 2300

Marketplace > Ohio State University > Psychlogy > Psych 2300 > Psych 2300 Chapter 8 Notes
GPA 3.54

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

Bivariate correlational research causal covariance internal validity validity temporal precedence correlational strength measurement change imperfect correlation t test anova association...
Research Methods In Psychology
Emanuele Rizzi
Class Notes
The Ohio State University, Psychology Research, psychology research methods, research methods, ohio state, ohio state university, direction, Strength, Generalization, directionality, validity, external, third-variable, association, inference, third-variable problem, directionality problem, External Validity, predictive, internal, range, relation, curvilinear, Probability, p-value, outliers, outlier, statistical significance, construct validity assessment, construct validity, statistical validity, effect size, significant, variable, importance, meaning, measure, control, conditions, construct, interrogation, interrogating association claims, test statistic, pearson's r, Pearson, predict, R, correlation, perfect correlation, causation, associative, t-test, ANOVA, manipulated, measured, Correlation does not = causation, associative claim, manipulated variables, measured variables, imperfect correlation, measurement change, Internal Validity, temporal precedence, correlational strength, causal, Covariance, Bivariate correlational research, buckeyes, #maymaystudies, #psych, #Psychology, Psychology, psych
25 ?




Popular in Research Methods In Psychology

Popular in Psychlogy

This 3 page Class Notes was uploaded by MadsSwart on Wednesday July 6, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to Psych 2300 at Ohio State University taught by Emanuele Rizzi in Summer 2016. Since its upload, it has received 41 views. For similar materials see Research Methods In Psychology in Psychlogy at Ohio State University.


Reviews for Psych 2300: Chapter 8 Notes


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 07/06/16
Chapter 8: bivariate correlational research - When you see two things that are related, and you think are related, but actually have nothing to do with one another To be causal - Covariance - Internal validity - Temporal precedence Correlational strength - As you get a measurement change by this much on this chart or whatever - You get the same ratio change on the other chart for the other variable - This means that they are changing at the same rate o Either moving at the same amount in the same direction [perfect correlation o Or moving at the same amount in the opposite direction [perfect correlation - When they don’t move at the same rate; imperfect correlation – this is what r actually does; what r is saying is that this is how much [the magnitude] or proportion of changes in each other - X percent of change in this can predict the change in this - The more correlated things are, the closer they will fall to the line, and the stronger the correlation is; closer to 1 T test and anova are used to measure causal but can also be used to measure association Association – measured not manipulated Association does NOT equal causation Not the test statistic that matters; how the test was measured Associations with categorical variables - Causal claim version - Assign conditions ; manipulate - Comparison is the same - To compare marital satisfaction among people who met naturally vs. online you would have to force people to marry someone online vs. in person [that’s what you would be manipulating/controlling] - So even though you are still performing a t test, the causal claim isn’t best Interrogating association claims - Construct validity o How well was each variable measured o Evaluate every variable of interest; every variable you are trying to discuss o Address for each variable EX: take significant other out to scary movie or romantic movie?  Two bridges: scary bridge and control bridge with attractive female  Can which bridge you cross assess heightened emotional state o Construct Validity of Study  Thematic Apperception Test [TAT] & Follow-up Call [behavioral]  Interrater Reliability; multiple measures show convergence: validity  Heart rate risen; automatic so good measure of sexual arousal  TAT: show ambiguous picture and describe picture o Someone aroused gives more detailed explaination  Variables: type of bridge crossed (scary vs. control) – categorical Arousal / attraction (TAT score & % call back)  TAT not a good way to measure; if you don’t believe in the way the variable is measured, then the claim cannot be made.  Call back could be a better measure - Statistical validity o How well do the data support the data support the conclusion? > Accuracy of Measurement >how important/meaningful are the results? o Effect Size  Strength of an association; falling more in line with each other [spread]  Smaller spread = greater effect size  Stronger correlations = more accurate predictions  Predictive and Causal are NOT the same thing o Statistical Significance  P-values  probability that you’re correlation IS FALSE  The lower the probability, the more likely that it’s true  In world/truth there is no correlation – so should show no correlation  Larger effect size = likelier to be statistically significant o Outliers  Most dangerous when you have a low amount of data  Less effective with a large number of data points  Pulls data in its direction  Be aware when dealing with association claims  Evaluate statistical validity/outliers rationally o Range Restriction  Having as much of the scale as possible helps you to know for sure that the correlation/relationship you are observing is representative of the ENTIRE set of data o Curvilinear Relation  May be predictive in a way other than a straight line  Could be going up and then down etc.  Correlations tell you how well data fits on a line; not if there is a correlation - Internal Validity o Can we make a causal inference from an association? o Do we assess internal validity for associative claims? – No; only for causal  Why is the relationship not causal?  Causality is tempting, but need to be able to differentiate between the 2 o Third-variable problem: two variables seem causal/related when there is a third variable making it seem like there is a relationship  must be correlated to both other variables o Directionality Problem: you can’t change the direction of the variables and get the same result[order matters] o Spurious association: not due to an actual relationship between variables; correlation exists because of some other third variable  don’t have anything in common with each other - External Validity o To whom can the association be generalized? o In associative claims  No random, no fowl  Not using random sampling does not reject association  Relationship between variables may still generalize WITHIN other populations Pearson’s R: Strength and Direction of Correlation Associative Relationship: 1- Related variables 2-measured variables


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Allison Fischer University of Alabama

"I signed up to be an Elite Notetaker with 2 of my sorority sisters this semester. We just posted our notes weekly and were each making over $600 per month. I LOVE StudySoup!"

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.