New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

PSC 101 Tuman Week 5 Lecture Notes

by: Stephanie Smith

PSC 101 Tuman Week 5 Lecture Notes PSC 101

Marketplace > University of Nevada - Las Vegas > Politica science > PSC 101 > PSC 101 Tuman Week 5 Lecture Notes
Stephanie Smith


Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

These notes include all of the information Tuman writes or projects on the board and all concepts he verbally emphasizes. The majority of midterm and final exam review questions can be answered...
Intro American Politics
John Tuman
Class Notes
political science
25 ?




Popular in Intro American Politics

Popular in Politica science

This 4 page Class Notes was uploaded by Stephanie Smith on Tuesday August 16, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PSC 101 at University of Nevada - Las Vegas taught by John Tuman in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 5 views. For similar materials see Intro American Politics in Politica science at University of Nevada - Las Vegas.

Popular in Politica science


Reviews for PSC 101 Tuman Week 5 Lecture Notes


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 08/16/16
Wk 5 Monday I. TANF - conclusion A. Effects of reform 1. Trends in benefits a) 2015 median benefit across all states for a family of 3 (2 kids, 1 parent): $429 / month (*for this section he repeated several times that we need to remember that these numbers have not been adjusted for inflation over time since the reform in 1996) (1) In 14 states a family of 3 got $300 or less (2) some of these families are eligible for other benefits (a) Most overlap with: i) SNAP (Nutrition program which we call food stamps) ii) Median value of SNAP benefits was $400/month b) 1996-2014 (1) In 1996 TANF covered 66 out of 100 poor families (2) 2014 TANF covered 23 out of 100 poor families (3) this demonstrates that the proportion of poor families covered by TANF benefits has decreased 2. Trend in caseload a) In 1996: 12.6 million total number of individuals on TANF program, of that 8.6 million were children b) In 2015: 2.8 million total people, aka huge decline c) Hypothesis about explanation for the huge decline: (1) Employment - work requirements (2) Time limits / sanctions - individuals either timed out, or failed to meet a program requirement and were made ineligible (3) Entry berries - people not applying because the criteria have become more difficult to meet (4) Conducted both observational and experimental studies from 1996-2002: (a) Grogger and Karoly: looked at 35 experimental studies and tried to parse out which factors explained the decrease over time (b) Found that time limits and sanctions explain most of the change (c) What happens in labor markets does not affect the number of people on the program 3. Denison and Klerma 1996-2002 a) Try to answer question about whether work requirements help lift people out of poverty (1) the bulk of the evidence pointed to the fact that work requirements did not help people get out of poverty (a) Most people had: i) a highschool diploma or less ii) non-continuous work history iii) minimum wage (1) These people did not have enough earning potential to be lifted out of poverty, which is what made the work requirements ineffective in lifting people out of poverty (they did not acquire any new skills or get job training) 4. What do states spend TANF funds on? a) 2014: (1) 26% of funds spent on income support (2) 24% job training / childcare (3) 30% “other” (a) couples counseling (b) anti-abortion “pregnancy counseling” (c) early childhood education (Head Start) (d) Financial aid for college students - substitution (states did not want to raise taxes for financial aid, so they use TANF funds) b) “takeaway for the exam” [according to Tuman himself] is that when states were given a block grant for funds and then authority on how to spend the money, states end up on spending the TANF funds in “creative” ways, as shown above c) II. Social Security (we will learn why it is more difficult to reform an entitlement program than a program like welfare) A. Background 1. History of the program a) 1935: Social Security Act (retirees, survivors, unemployment insurance, which is cooperative) b) 1972: SSI benefits SSI (disability) c) Other Program provisions (Medicare, veterans’ disability, black lung) 2. Assumptions of Policy-Makers a) Savings of workers (1) clear data show that employees do not save for retirement or emergencies unless they are forced or strongly motivated to (2) Retirement programs in the private sector did not exist when Social Security was founded b) Adequacy of private sector or non-profit coverage (charities) c) Male “breadwinner” model B. Program Structure and Coverage 1. Payroll tax (Federal Insurance Contributions Act, or FICA tax). a) 6.2% on $118,500 (employee) b) 6.2% on $118,500 (employer) c) (Medicare is 1.45% each on all income; individuals $200,000 pay 0.9% or more). 2. Ear-marked tax a) The FICA tax goes into a trust fund, administered by at the Social Security Administration. Surpluses may only be invested in government securities (Federal bonds). US general federal revenues may not be used to support Social Security. 3. Distributive effects a) High income workers receive less as a % of pre-retirement income compared low-income; but because the FICA tax is capped, high income employees pay less as a % of income in the tax. 4. Coverage a) June 2013 (1) All beneficiaries 57,469,232 (2) Retired Workers and dependents 40,298,999 (3) Survivors 6,216,500 (4) Disabled workers and dependents 10,953,733 C. Challenges Facing the Program 1. Demographic Change a) Shrinking Workforce (1) US Fertility Decline (a) Fertility rate (births per 1,000 women, ages 15-44, by year) i) 1946 101.9 ii) 1956 121 iii) 1964 104.7 iv) 1980 68.4 v) 1990 70.9 vi) 2000 67.5 vii) 2010 66.2 (b) Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2) Reduction in growth rate in US labor force. Most growth from entry of “Baby Boomers” and women in the labro force has already occurred. (a) Labor force in the US grew at an annual rate of 1.7% during the 1960’s, but slowed to 1.1% in the 1990s. (CPS data) (b) Average annual growth in labor force is projected at 0.6% for the next 50 years Wk 5 Tuesday (c) The US is not alone, Demographers forecast that Japan’s labor force will experience a 12% decline between 2000 and 2020 (d) Because social security depends on contributions from current workers to support retirees, the trend in the labor force will create problems. In 1960, the ratio of covered workers to retirees was 5.1 to 1. This fell to 3.2 to 1 in 1980, and has remained about 2.9 to 1 in 2010. b) Baby Boomers (1) Baby Boomers- the cohort born between 1946 and 1964 - Since 2010, about 10,000 “Boomers” per day will reach the age of 65. AS a result, the share of the US population aged 65 or older will increase from approximately 13% in 2010 to 17% in 2030. After that, most Boomers will be at or close to retirement age (although note that the Boomers born after 1960 must already wait until age 67 to claim full benefits). c) Life expectancy (1) Demographers estimate that in 1935, average life expectancy for people age 65 was 12.5 years. By 2012, life expectancy increased by 20.4 years for women reaching age 65, and about 18 years for men. This will increase again through 2030. Still, recent data suggest that Boomers are more prone to diabetes and other risk factors. 2. Cost a) Cost of the program is affected by the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA). Due to the Great Recession, and low inflation, the COLA did not increase in 2010 and 2011. But prior increases have expanded cost. b) In 2012, the mean (average) Social Security benefit for a retired individual was $1,230. the maximum benefit in 2013 for an individual claiming benefits at age 65 was $2,533 (if age 70, $3,350). 3. Projected Deficit a) If we leave the financing for the program the way it is, there will be a deficit at some point. The program would then only be able to pay out 80% of benefits. D. Reform Proposals 1. Raise Retirement Age 2. Slow Growth in Benefits (refers to cost of living adjustment) 3. Raise Payroll Tax a) Increase or eliminate the cap on income subject to the FICA tax b) Increase the rate, or make it progressive 4. Radical Suggestions a) Stock Market Investment (1) would create volatility in the market (2) putting gov funds into private companies - agenda issues (3) market correction risk b) Partial Privatization (1) If you are 50 or older, the employee can take the required 6.2% and save it for himself. The gov would make sure that wherever you saved / invested this money was approved. These companies would have to be regulated and licensed. The employer would still pay the required amount into social security. (2) This would not solve the fiscal deficit. To guarantee traditional social security, Congress would have to pass a supplemental tax. c) Full Privatization (1) Eliminate Social Security Administration; both employees and employers still have to contribute, everything goes into private investment. E. Politics of Reform 1. AFDC / TANF —> reform 2. Social Security —> No reform 3. Pluralism a) (Groups on demand side, Politicians on supply side) b) Children and people under AFDC (1) not organized into an interest group c) the largest interest group in the country is the AARP (their biggest priority is keeping social security the way it is) [exacerbated by the fact that old people move where it is warm, often to swing states such as Nevada and Florida]


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Allison Fischer University of Alabama

"I signed up to be an Elite Notetaker with 2 of my sorority sisters this semester. We just posted our notes weekly and were each making over $600 per month. I LOVE StudySoup!"

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.