New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

LEGL 2700 Ch.5 Reading Notes

by: Jessica Su

LEGL 2700 Ch.5 Reading Notes LEGL 2700

Marketplace > University of Georgia > LEGL 2700 > LEGL 2700 Ch 5 Reading Notes
Jessica Su
GPA 3.8

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

This is the reading note for chapter five.
Legal Studies
Lara Grow
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Legal Studies

Popular in Department

This 3 page Class Notes was uploaded by Jessica Su on Tuesday August 30, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to LEGL 2700 at University of Georgia taught by Lara Grow in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 14 views.


Reviews for LEGL 2700 Ch.5 Reading Notes


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 08/30/16
● Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) Systems  ○ Scale, lowest cost to highest cost  ■ Negotiated settlement < Mediation < Arbitration < Focus Groups < Trial  and Appeal   ○ Settlement  ■ Businesses tend to settle disputes with customers bc it is not good  business from a goodwill and public relations standpoint to sue customer,  and juries are frequently sympathetic to individuals who have suits  against large corporations   ○ Focus Group  ■ The attorneys assemble a group of citizens and present their evidence.  ■ Find out the weaknesses and strengths. This “reality test” helps disputing  parties to engage in more meaningful negotiations and settle without  going through trial   ○ Arbitration  ■ A third party walks in and decide the merits of the dispute  ■ Getting more and more popular   ■ Helps parties to avoid the expense of litigation and avoid formalities of the  courtroom, such as formal pleadings, discovery, and the rules of evidence   ■ No public records   ■ Submission​­ the process of beginning an arbitration proceeding  ■ Voluntary arbitration​  the agreement of the disputing parties to use  arbitration  ● Irrevocable: a party thinks arbitration is not going well cannot  withdraw from it and resort to litigation   ● Predispute arbitration clause­​ both parties show good  judgement in understanding conflicts exist, conflicts give rise to  disputes, and disputes are better resolved through arbitration  rather than by litigation  ● Postdispute arbitration clause­​ agreement after parties already  in dispute decide that arbitration is better than litigation  ● Prefer predispute arbitration clause bc parties may not be able to  find the common ground to agree to arbitrate   ■ Mandatory arbitration­ ​ the court requires parties to arbitrate   ■ Award­ ​ the decision of the arbitration; must be in writing; valid as long as  it settles the entire controversy and states which party is to pay the other  a sum of money   ■ Most states require an agreement in voluntary arbitration since the goal  was to obtain a quick solution   ○ Arbitrators  ■ Chosen by the disputing parties  ■ Expert in such issue   ● Ex. medical doctors can be used to decide health care disputes  ■ No licensing requirement; however, an arbitrator often is chosen from a  list of qualified arbitrators provided by the arbitrator service   ■ Usually one or three. Three: each party selects one, and the two select  the third one   ■ Cannot appeal to the court unless there is evidence of overt corruption or  misconduct   ■ Arbitration would not get popular without ​ ederal Arbitration Act  ● FAA changed public policy perceptions of arbitration and how  states can regulate its use   ● Provides that an award can be cated if it can be proved that it was  procured by “corruption, fraud, or other undue means”  ○ “Undue means” = inappropriate or inadequate nature of  evidence, unfair  ● The party who chose that arbitrator is partial or corrupt  ● Mandated Arbitration  ○ Usually presented in 3 arbitrators   ○ Arbitrators are usually practicing lawyers or retired judges  ○ A record of proceedings is required   ○ Types of Cases  ■ Cases that deal with money with less than $15,000  ■ Cases in which a party has demanded a jury trial, as it can assumed that  a judge hearing a case is as efficient as an arbitrator   ○ Procedures  ■ Place a claim in the arbitration track within the time of filing  ■ A date and time of hearing are assigned, typically 8 months from the date  of filing   ■ Discovery before the hearing of arbitration   ● Judicial Reviews  ○ Reviews on Voluntary Arbitration Awards  ■ The award is final, rarely reviewed  ■ Exception: when the scope of an arbitration clause is debatable or  reasonably in doubt  ■ Even in this case, the award still cannot be set aside because both the  parties agreed to accept the arbitrator’s view of the law   ○ Review of Statutorily Mandated Arbitration  ■ Treat it a level higher than voluntary arbitration  ■ If the courts believe the arbitration is against the constitution, the  dissatisfied party can reject the arbitrator’s award and seek a ​de novo  ​ judicial review of that rewards  ​ ● De novo means that the court tries the issues anew as if no  arbitration occurred   ● Mediation­​ the process by which an unbiased and disinterested third person, called  mediator​, attempts to assist disputing parties in resolving their differences  ○ Cannot impose a binding solution   ○ A trial judge may require the disputing parties to submit to the mediation process  before a complaint can be litigated formally  ■ Purpose: decrease the caseload  ○ Why did mediation grow?  ■ The disputing parties retain control over when to settle and when to  continue disputing   ■ Cost savings compared to litigation and even arbitration since there is no  presentation of evidence, the role of lawyers is reduced   ■ One party can stop midway by simply stating that they will not participate  further  ○ Procedures  ■ Mediator’s introduction and explanation of mediation  ■ Parties’ opening statements  ■ Parties’ exchange or negotiation  ■ Brainstorm possible options  ■ Agreement (written and signed)  ■ Caucus­ ​ private meetings of just one disputing party if the mediator thinks  it is more productive that way  ○ Disadvantage  ○ No enforcement mechanism that ensures the parties will mediate in good faith   ○ Both parties must agree on selecting one mediator  


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Kyle Maynard Purdue

"When you're taking detailed notes and trying to help everyone else out in the class, it really helps you learn and understand the I made $280 on my first study guide!"

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.