Social Psychology PSY 270-001
Popular in psy orientation soc psy
verified elite notetaker
Popular in Psychology
verified elite notetaker
This 4 page Class Notes was uploaded by Bailey Anderson on Wednesday September 14, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PSY 270-001 at Indiana State University taught by Dr. Sheets in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 23 views. For similar materials see psy orientation soc psy in Psychology at Indiana State University.
Reviews for Social Psychology
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 09/14/16
Social Psychology Week 4 Notes Chapter 4 cont. Why don’t “attitudes” predict behavior? o This assumes “attitudes” are first (causal o But if “attitudes” are part of larger system No obvious reason affect/behavior o Imagine subjects come into the lab, sit down and they are given a peg board with little wooden spools (48). They are told to turn each spool a quarter of a turn, do all and then go back and turn each another quarter of a turn. They do this for 30 minutes. After the RA says “we are doing a study on how expectations lead to feelings about something and you were part of the control group. The next RA didn’t show up so will you play the RA for the next subject? The next subject isn’t in the control group so we need the next subject to expect this to be fun. Can you stay and relay this to the next subject?” Half were told they would be paid $20, the other half were told they would be paid $1. They tell the next subject how exciting the task is and then leave. On the way out, they see someone who says they’re interested in experience in research. They asked how interesting and exciting the study was. Who would be most convinced that the study was exciting? People paid $1. The people paid $1 had insufficient justification o Aronson & Mills study Women invited to join a sex discussion group. 3 conditions: no initiation (control) , mild initiation (had to read material in front of group) and severe initiation (had to read in front of males). Mild and severs were told they need to make sure the group will work so test you out and make sure you can engage in discussion. They told them they needed to show how the discussion group would work. They listened to a recording that made sex as boring as it can be. After listening they are asked how excited they are to be joining this group. Who is most excited? Severe because they had to work harder. Their experience doesn’t match belief so they say that it is exciting because of the experience they had reading Cognitive dissonance theory (Festingergenius) People want harmony in attitudinal system Discrepancies generate distressing arousal= dissonance We must fit it if we can’t change behavior, then change attitude Caveats: must be aware of discrepancy (especially in public), contr action must have been our choice Modes of dissonance reduction If behavior is unchangeable, change attitude Change behavior to be consistent (if possible) Aronson water reduction study: talk to people before they go to rec and ask them about water reduction, second research assistant gives survey to make them see hypocrisy in their behaviors (said they care about water reduction but don’t always do everything), third RA saw how long of showers each person took. They ended up taking shorter showers if they felt like hypocrites. Add consonant elements/beliefs: when prophecy failsthe seekers Alcoholic drugs Selfperception theory (D. Bem) o Likes “magic” and ESP o Dislikes “other people” o Ben said he had no selfinsight; thinks when asked o We are often asked attitudes about things we haven’t thought about o To answer questions, we consider out actions. Thus, actions cause attitudes o Study: survey A “occasionally” (occasionally attend church) Survey B: “always”. Rated religiousness. People taking survey A rated themselves as more religious. You answer based on your behavior The man on the moon video o How does this relate to social psychology? We need social interaction because we aren’t the same people without it. Perspective: we were looking at things from his perspective and we didn’t realize how small he was until the human stepped on him. We make dispositional attributions. Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment (on exam 2) o Don’t need to know details about study, just the big picture o Background: Class project: social psychology of institutions Prison group brought guest o Set up mock prison with help: 3, 6x9 cells in basement(cot, mattress, sheet, pillow) o 24 Ss recruited from campus paid for 2 week study of prison life, none were friends, all were tested for psychological health o Random assignment: half prisoners and half guards (12 and 12) o Set up: Guards worked 8 hour shifts, do counts/roll call at beginning, maintain order (4 guards for 12 people) Write diary at end of shift No physical aggression Prisoners= picked up from home via PA police, fingerprinted, blindfolded and brought to psych Given uniform(smock, sandals, chain around 1 ankle, a number) Remained in custody continuously 2 hrs for reading, 2 visiting periods per week, 3 toilet visits, 3 bland meals per day o Outcomes: Started smoothly, rebellion in 24 hours leader excused in 36hrs and others punished Prisoners: became passive and nonconforming, did less and less on own, referred to selves by number, day 6 a mock parole hearing (asked to give up pay to be let out they said yes) went back to cell Guards: became demeaning and degrading, after rebellion they took sheets off of bed, locked one up for refusing to eat and made others tease him about it o Stopped after 6 days due to Z’s girlfriend o 10yrs of followups= no ill effects o What does this study teach us? The important of social rolls Conformity conforming to the guard roll or the prisoner roll(refer by number) Power is corrupting? People can be cruel? There is evidence that social power gives entitlement Most important lesson: the power of the situation situations often come with rules (expectations for how to act) that serve as powerful and even overwhelming guides to behavior Role determines behavior (& perspective/attributions) Taking over independently of pacifistic identity o Why are such rules (roles) good? Dispositions are a more limited factor than we expect. the situation is what overwhelmed them Remove ambiguity of how to behave (actor) Give perception of predictability/fairness(observer) real guards who follow rules are seen as fair o Why are rules bad? Potential for “dehumanization” Rules impose an impersonal structure on relations
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'