New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Evidence 9/15

by: Hannah Notetaker

Evidence 9/15 POLI 3380

Hannah Notetaker

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

TH 3:30
Evidence & Legal Reasoning
Dr. Clifton Perry
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Evidence & Legal Reasoning

Popular in Department

This 2 page Class Notes was uploaded by Hannah Notetaker on Monday September 19, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to POLI 3380 at Auburn University taught by Dr. Clifton Perry in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 14 views.


Reviews for Evidence 9/15


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 09/19/16
9/15/16 Huddleston Case buys and sells B&W tvs charged with buying and selling stolen property argues he didn’t know it was stolen had prior acts of buying from the same individual for cheap and in large qualities 404b requires similarity of the acts need sufficiency to support a finding cheap large quantities all bought from same party who got them through theft not substantiated with bill of sale so the evidence that it was stolen is admissible Rule 406: Habit; routine practice evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice may be admitted to prove that on a particular occasion the person or organization acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice. The court may admit this evidence regardless of whether it is corroborated or whether there was an eyewitness must demonstrate that it almost always happens demonstrate that the individual would have likely done it this time because they habitually do it Rule 407: subsequent remedial measures when measures are taken that would have made an earlier injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in a product or its design, or a need for warning or instruction but the court may admit this evidence for another purpose such as impeachability, proving ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures - aka it is not feasible to do it that way then you prove that you can fix it in that way; or if you sue someone because your banister is broken and they argue they don’t own the banister but they fixed it last time so its their fault 3rd parties note: There is a vender who sells food in student center, AU who discriminates who to let in the student center to sell food, and then there is you, a student. You can go after the vendor or you can go after AU because they did not test the vendor first like they should do. So Student v. AU. The minute the suit comes about then the vendor changes their food to a way that someone can never get sick… so it is a subsequent measure so you cannot bring it up to sue the vendor. However, you can mention the vendor change in your suit against AU. Then, AU will go after the vendor but since the vendor made the changes, they cannot use the change against the vendor. 407 protects the vendor but not AU. Tuer Case 50 year old man need coronary bypass hospital’s process is to give some sort of medicine up to 2 1/2 hours before the operation because this medicine allows for 10% chance that the anesthesiologist could accidentally and negligently hit you can you would bleed out… so they thin the blood just enough doctor doesn’t come by at the time he is supposed to and they ignore this fact and go through with the procedure and the man has cardiac arrest, survives it, but then dies the next day people who did survive him are mad and bring about a wrongful death suit plaintiff sues defendant for wrongful death of victim even if it was in negligence policy said this was proper method - saying it isn’t feasible to do it any other way


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Jennifer McGill UCSF Med School

"Selling my MCAT study guides and notes has been a great source of side revenue while I'm in school. Some months I'm making over $500! Plus, it makes me happy knowing that I'm helping future med students with their MCAT."

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.