New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

BSB Issues 150, Week 2

by: Wendy Liu

BSB Issues 150, Week 2 01:119:150

Wendy Liu
GPA 4.0

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

Covers ethical/unethical scientific research, reasons for misconduct, etc.
Biology, Society, and Biomedical Issues
Anthony Uzwiak
Class Notes
Biology, sociology, medical sociology
25 ?




Popular in Biology, Society, and Biomedical Issues

Popular in Biological Sciences

This 2 page Class Notes was uploaded by Wendy Liu on Thursday September 22, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to 01:119:150 at Rutgers University taught by Anthony Uzwiak in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 220 views. For similar materials see Biology, Society, and Biomedical Issues in Biological Sciences at Rutgers University.

Similar to 01:119:150 at Rutgers


Reviews for BSB Issues 150, Week 2


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 09/22/16
Week 2: Ethical Scientific Research 19 September 2016, 22 September 2016 Biology, Society, and Biomedical Issues Professor Uzwiak Wendy Liu IF – impact factor – yearly average # of citations to that article/journal; higher # = more influential First author – responsible for intellectual content of paper; first name in list of authors Principal Investigator (PI) – research group leader, lab head, etc.; last name in list of authors Most scientific research is inductive - done in context of what’s already known (not deductive)  Scientists are obligated to know the field first before researching  You can’t accidentally replicate experiment bc you didn’t know that it exists already Retractions – official removal of a previously published paper: the original article should not have been published, it’s data and conclusions should not be used as part of the foundation for future research  Results not contributing to truth  Negatively affecting society  Almost 70% of all retractions are due to misconduct Reason for scientific misconduct: Publications = currency of science  Pressure for publications: o Funding grant proposals o Promotions o Keeping jobs/positions – need to show that you excel at science 3 forms of misconduct 1) Fraud – 50% retractions attributable to fraud a. Fabrication of data b. Falsification of data c. Violation of ethical standards d. Etc. 2) Plagiarism – 10% a. Taking others ideas, being aware of their work, using same methodology/approach, beat them to publication b. Using someone else’s style to write (bc you suck at scientific/technical writing) 3) Duplicate replication – <10% a. Stealing data/info/graphs from your own work b. Recycling data from past papers + republishing it Predictors of committing fraud: 1. History of fraud – people who have committed fraud in the past are likely to repeat in the future a. ~53% of fraudulent papers are written by a first author who are repeat offenders i. only 18% of erroneous papers are written by repeat offenders 2. Geographical location – fraud is more common in USA, Germany, Japan, China, etc. a. Significantly more fraud than error among retracted papers from USA than rest of world b. USA+Germany+Japan+China account for ¾ of retractions due to fraud Characteristics of fraudulent papers:  fraudulent papers have more authors o diffusion of responsibility o collaborators tend to also have retracted papers  fraudulent papers take longer to retract that erroneous papers  fraudulent papers are published in journals with higher IF o one publication in a high IF journal is worth equal to or even more than many publications in lower IF journals Prof. Uzwiak’s solution to unethical scientific research  Currently: no one but the researcher himself gets to see the “real data” o Published data is all condensed forms of the original through statistics  Suggestion #1: whoever funded the grant owns the data set o if requested, researchers must provide the original data to the “owners”  Suggestion #2: make data publicly available & accessible, which should be easer today b/c we have more powerful technology (i.e. the internet)


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Anthony Lee UC Santa Barbara

"I bought an awesome study guide, which helped me get an A in my Math 34B class this quarter!"

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.