IAFF 2190, Week 5 Notes
IAFF 2190, Week 5 Notes IAFF 2190
Popular in Presidents At war
Popular in International Affairs
verified elite notetaker
This 2 page Class Notes was uploaded by Caroline Jok on Thursday September 29, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to IAFF 2190 at George Washington University taught by Dr. Henry Nau in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 2 views. For similar materials see Presidents At war in International Affairs at George Washington University.
Reviews for IAFF 2190, Week 5 Notes
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 09/29/16
Presidents At War 27 September 2016 1. What are the possible criteria for ranking presidents and which criteria does Merry adopt? 2. Which presidents did better by the electorate than by the historians and vice versa? 3. Are historians objective? What did Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. do that annoyed Merry? Is Merry objective? Can performance be separated from partisanship/ideology? Have Jackson and Polk been treated fairly? Merry Takeaway: Criteria to Rank Presidents; • Contemporary judgement of electorate o One term (Polk, Adams) o 2 terms and party succeeds in WH (FDR, Reagan, Grant, VA presidents) • Contemporary judgement of the electorate matters, the future judgment is left out. • Do you think about past presidents when you vote now? § Merry assumes not. o Inherited term, reelected and party succeeds in WH (Lincoln, McKinley, Coolidge) • Collective (not individual) judgement of Historians o Political Bias (Jackson, Madison, Eisenhower, Reagan) o Why not Economist, Political Scientists? • Historians know more (in theory) • Future judgement of Public opinion (Truman) o Influenced by historians and biographers • Difficulty of Historical Circumstances o What about those that each man ran against? How does that play into how their terms played out? o The promises they made? o What they were handed? • Do Merry's criteria avoid partisanship o For Merry there is ultimately no objective stance, so the compromise is the collective judgment of the people • The big argument against that: What if our elections are rigged? Spun? Corrupt? § It validates the quality of our elections.
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'