New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

PHL 3000 Week One Notes: Aug. 31- Sep. 12

by: Haley Cochran

PHL 3000 Week One Notes: Aug. 31- Sep. 12 PHL 3000

Marketplace > Wright State University > Philosophy > PHL 3000 > PHL 3000 Week One Notes Aug 31 Sep 12
Haley Cochran
GPA 3.89

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

These notes cover class materials and discussions from August 31st to September 12. The notes take a look at #Socrates in #TheApology , and #TheCrito
Critical Thinking
Dr. Scott Wilson
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Critical Thinking

Popular in Philosophy

This 7 page Class Notes was uploaded by Haley Cochran on Friday September 30, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PHL 3000 at Wright State University taught by Dr. Scott Wilson in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 2 views. For similar materials see Critical Thinking in Philosophy at Wright State University.


Reviews for PHL 3000 Week One Notes: Aug. 31- Sep. 12


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 09/30/16
Critical Thinking   August 31, 2016    Why Critical Thinking?  1. General: applies to any possible subject of inquiry.  2. Reflective: thinking about thinking.  3. Critical: questions whether reasoning is good or bad; aim to improve our thinking.  4. Overcome obstacles due to human nature.  Socrates (470­399 B.C.)  ­A “Good” person according to the Greeks:  ­Fit, strong, successful, good looking, wealthy.  ­No relation to morals.  ­A “Bad” person according to the Greeks:  ­Sick, poor, failure.    Contemporary Good vs. Evil > Moral > focuses on what you do.    Socrates was prosecuted for:  1. Corrupting the youth  2. Not believing in the gods of Athens  3. Creating new gods  Historical Context  ● Greco­Persian War (499­449 BC)  a. Persia vs. Greek City States  b. Persia was the larger, stronger force  c. The Greeks won  d. Ushered by the “Golden Era” of Athens  ● Peloponnesian War (431­404 BC)  a. Athens vs. Sparta  b. Athens loses to Sparts  c. Athens was a democracy before the loss  d. After the loss Sparta puts 30 Tyrants in charge  i. Many were Athenians  ii. Many of those were Socrates’s followers                        September 2, 2016  Plato:  ● Wrote dialogues  ○ Early (Socratic)  ○ Middle  ○ Late  ■ The Middle and Late Dialogues are known as Platonic  Socrates (The Apology)  ● Never wrote any texts   ● Philosophy is not a subject matter, like biology, math, etc, but a way of life.  ○ Philos (love) + sophia (wisdom) = Philosophy (love of wisdom)  ● Fully committed to the truth  ● He “goes where the arguments take him”  ● Applies to all subjects  ● Sought the true nature of, or knowledge of:  ○ The Most Important Things in Life**  ■ Is it…  ● Justice  ● Truth  ● Beauty  ● Right and Wrong  ● Good and Bad  *Asked powerful people who professed to know The Most Important Things in Life  ­He ended up embarrassing them  ➔ The Oracle at Delphi:  ◆ Known trickster  ● For hubris (over confident)  ◆ Was asked, “Is anyone wiser than Socrates?”  ● Response: “No, none are wiser.  ○ Socrates: “How can I be wisest when I know nothing?”  Socrates’s Mission from the gods:  ● Going to find one wiser than me  1. Politicians  2. Poets (Artist)  3. Craftsmen  ● Socrates questions the Politicians:  ○ Under questioning, it was shown that they do not know  ■ They have no particular knowledge except flattery  ● Socrates questions the Poets:  ○ Poets have an ability  ○ Cannot explain to others how to gain ability  ○ Believe ability gives them knowledge of Most Important Things.  ● Socrates  questions the Craftsmen:  ○ Have an ability, plus they can explain how  ○ But, they think they also know about the Most Important Things    ​ Question: Are they all equally wise, or is Socrates in fact wiser, why?    Spectrum of Knowledge:      The Official Charges  1. Socrates corrupts the youth of Athens  2. Socrates does not believe in gods (He is an atheist)  3. Socrates creates new gods  ** 2 and 3 contradict each others    Was Socrates an atheist?  ● Socrates did have very unique views about the gods:  ○ Socrates’s view: The gods are good. We should follow them because they are  right, correct, perfect, and worth following.  ○ Popular view: The Gods are powerful. Follow because you do not want to be  hurt.  ● Socrates believed the gods spoke directly to him  ○ Didn’t tell him what to do  ○ Told him to avoid wrong  ○ Beginning of soul?    Did Socrates corrupt the youth?  A. Was he a sophist?  a. Paid teacher  i. 1.5 years salary  b. Could support or destroy any position  c. Concluded: No truth, only power  d. But, he wasn’t one  B. Socrates’s Method  a. Elenchus  i. Ask a professed expert to define a term in their expertise.  1. Ask a series of questions, intending to show this definition  contradicts something else the person believes  C. Socrates would never intentionally corrupt those around him  a. Corrupt people are dangerous people  b. Is it reasonable to believe I alone corrupt?  c. Concludes: That if he corrupts, he should be corrected, not punished  Sentencing Phase  ● They suggest death  ● They expected Socrates to offer a fine or expulsion  ● A series of feast to celebrate Socrates  Was Socrates Good for Athens?  ● Gadfly Analogy  ○ Puts ignorance directly in front of your face  ○ He “benefits” people by publicly showing them their ignorance and hypocrisy  Socrates on the Good  ● The unexamined life is not worth living  ○ Good for you requires you to know what goodness is  ○ If I know X is good, then I will X.  ■ What is good for you is being morally good  ■ What is bad for you is being morally bad  ○ Aiming at your own perfection                                                    September 9, 2016    Eudaimonia  ● Attempts to define  a. Happiness  ■ But happiness is transitory, while Eudaimonia is not  b. Excellence  ■ But understand as non­moral  c. Flourishing**  ■ Compare to plants and animals  Biggest Question of Ancient Ethics  ● What is eudaimonia  ● What does it consist of  a. Hedonism*  ■ Pleasure = the Good  ■ Pain = the Bad  b. Wealth/Power*  c. Reputation/Honor*  d. Being Virtuous  ■ Having your soul (or mind) in order  ● Reason rules over desire  ● You do not want things more than they are worth  ○ Objective truth concerning how much things are worth  *A­C allow for conflict between what is best for you and what is right.    If you want to live a life of eudaimonia (which everyone does), then you must always be virtuous  and do what is right.    Should Socrates Escape From Jail?  ● If you don’t, you will be doing just what your enemies want  ○ Socrates: so what?  ● You won’t support your family anymore  ○ Socrates: never did  ● We will look bad  ○ Socrates: so what  ★ Is it right?                    September 12, 2016  The Crito  Why Socrates Thinks He Should Stay  ● Basic Principles:  ○ One ought never to act unjustly (or do evil)  ○ One ought never to return an injustice for an injustice (don’t do evil in return for  evil)  ○ One must keep their agreement as long as they are just  What Do These Principles Imply About Escaping?  ● Procedural vs. Content Justice  ○ Procedural Justice:​ Following a fair procedure. Results in just due to procedure  ■ Procedure was followed for Socrates  ○ Content Justice​: Did the verdict get it right?  ■ They got it wrong  ○ 3 Arguments to Stay  1. The Parent Argument  2. The Benefactor Argument  3. The Agreement Argument    ➔ The Parent Argument  ◆ The State is (like) a parent to Socrates  ● Acculturation  ● Gives life, food, things needed  ○ Potential Counters:  ◆ Abusive Parents  ◆ Missing, Racist, Criminal, etc. Parents  ◆ Everyone ought to obey their parents  ◆ If Socrates escapes he will disobey his parents (state)  ◆ Therefore, Socrates ought not to escape  ◆ “Forced” into situation, no options. You owe them    ➔ The Benefactor Argument  ◆ The state is Socrates’s benefactor  ◆ Everyone ought to obey their benefactors  ● What about State benefits; Friends also benefit  ● What if the Benefactor tells you to do wrong thing (evil)  ◆ If Socrates were to escape, he would disobey his benefactors  ◆ Therefore, he ought not to escape  ➔ The Agreement Argument  *Passive Agreement, Tacit  ◆ Socrates made an agreement to follow the laws of Athens  ◆ Everyone ought to keep their agreements  ◆ If Socrates escapes he will break his agreement  ◆ Therefore, Socrates ought no escape                             


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Anthony Lee UC Santa Barbara

"I bought an awesome study guide, which helped me get an A in my Math 34B class this quarter!"

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.