New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

More State Legislature and The Courts - Week 8 - POLS 2312

by: Sera

More State Legislature and The Courts - Week 8 - POLS 2312 POLS 2312-006

Marketplace > University of Texas at Arlington > History > POLS 2312-006 > More State Legislature and The Courts Week 8 POLS 2312

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

A little bit extra about the State Legislature and The State and US Court systems.
State & Local Government
Daniel D Sledge
Class Notes
state, statelegislature, courts, statecourts, uscourts, supremecourt, legislature, pols, politicalscience, Government, txgoverment, txgov, pols2312
25 ?




Popular in State & Local Government

Popular in History

This 4 page Class Notes was uploaded by Sera on Saturday October 15, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to POLS 2312-006 at University of Texas at Arlington taught by Daniel D Sledge in Fall 2016. Since its upload, it has received 6 views. For similar materials see State & Local Government in History at University of Texas at Arlington.

Similar to POLS 2312-006 at UTA


Reviews for More State Legislature and The Courts - Week 8 - POLS 2312


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 10/15/16
Note taker: Sera POLS 2312 A Little More State Legislature + The Courts  US Congress and a few state legislatures have “professional” legislatures: o High pay o Full time job o Well-staffed  Texas and other states have “amateur” legislatures o Not highly paid o Not a full time job o Not highly staffed  (Texas is not considered fully “amateur” because it is highly staffed) How Bills Become Laws in Texas  The process for a bill to become a law in Texas is very similar to how it works in Congress 1. A member of the Texas State House or Senate introduces a bill (referred to as “throwing it into the hopper”) 2. The bill will be referred to a committee by the Speaker of the House or Lieutenant Governor (depending on where it is introduced) where hearing will be held over it and debates will be held; during this time, it is edited in any way needed 3. The bill is sent out to the House/Senate floor where it is discussed further and then voted on 4. The bill is then sent to the other branch of legislature for the same process 5. Since different changes can be made to the same bill in the House and Senate, leading ultimately to two different bills being passed, a conference committee is formed from members of the House and Senate to discuss and amend the bill together. 6. After the bill is done being edited, it is sent back through the House and Senate to be voted on again 7. The bill is then sent to the Governor who can sign it into law, veto it (almost guaranteeing it will not become a law), or refuse to sign it (it still becomes a law, but sends a message about what the governor thinks of the law) The Filibuster  First used in the US Senate  Gives a great deal of power to individual Senators  “Cloture” – vote to end a filibuster – requires 60 votes (in the US Senate)  South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond holds the record for the longest filibuster at 24 hours 18 minutes while filibustering the Civil Rights Act of 1957  US Senators can talk about whatever they want when filibustering (can read phone books, cook books, etc.)  Filibustering in Texas Note taker: Sera POLS 2312 o Discussion is limited to issues of “germane” to the bill being debated (you must talk about the bill, cannot talk about random things) o Senators cannot eat, drink, or use the bathroom o No sitting or leaning o Senators get a strike every time they violate a rule, at 3 strikes, they must end their filibuster o Wendy Davis filibustered for 11 hours against an anti-abortion bill on the last day of a special session The Courts  “Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the mature of its functions will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.” – The Federalist Papers #78  “Judges and justices are servants of the law, not the other way around. Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules; they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. But it is a limited role. Nobody ever want to a ball game to see them umpire.” – Chief Justice John Roberts, 2005 Famous Cases  Plessy v Ferguson (1896) – legalized segregation  Brown v Board of Education (1954) – segregation declared unconstitutional  Loving v Virginia (1967) – interracial marriage was made legal  Roe v Wade (1973) – abortion is legal  U.S. v Windsor (2013) – federal government must respect state-level marriage State Court Systems  Federal District Courts hear several hundred thousand cases a year- mostly over bankruptcy  Around 100 million cases are filed in state trial courts every year  State courts resolve the vast majority of legal disputes in the US State Court Structure  Trial Courts: an “empty slate”  Justice Courts, Municipal Courts, County-level courts, and state district courts Appellate Courts  Appellate courts do not decide issues of guilt or innocence or ensure that trials were conducted properly  An appeal must argue that prejudicial legal errors (Errors that would have affected the outcome) were made in the original case Note taker: Sera POLS 2312  In some cases, a court may hear an “actual innocence” appeal- actual DNA evidence proving innocence Courts of Last Resort  Hear appeals from the intermediate appellate courts  Texas Supreme Court (9 Justices): has final appellate jurisdiction in civil cases  Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (9 justices): Has final appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases  Texas and Oklahoma are the only two states with two separate supreme courts  Civil Law: often deals with relations between individuals and/or between organizations, state or federal government may take action for violations of regulations or contracts o May face fine or penalty, may have to give up property, but no jail time  Criminal Law: Violations of law. The state takes action against an individual who has broken the law through a prosecutor o Jail is an option State of Texas v Calvin Burdine  Calvin Burdine was charged with murdering a man, there was substantial evidence against him, but during his trial, his defense lawyer appeared to sleep during the entire trial  Burdine was found guilty and got ahold of a high quality lawyer who appealed that they could not incarcerate a man whose lawyer was asleep during the trial  Cockrell v Burdine: Burdine appealed to the federal court system because this was no a 6 amendment issue th o 6 amendment: Right to council was extended to state criminals in the Gideon v Wainwright case  Ruling from the Federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals: “Unconscious council amounts to no council at all”  Burdine’s trial was redone, with conscious council, and he was once again found guilty for murder Federal Court Structure  US District Courts (trial courts)  US Appellate Courts (hears the appeals of District Court decisions)  Supreme Court (decides on the appeals) The United States Supreme Court  9 justices: 8 “associate” justices and one Chief Justice  All judges have equal say and each has one vote  If the Chief Justice is in the majority in a decision, he assigns the writing of the majority opinion; if not, the most senior justice in the majority does it  Article 2, Section 2: “The President shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall… appoint judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Note taker: Sera POLS 2312 Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for…” o All federal justices/judges must be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate  Judges nominated to the Supreme Court must be impartial and unbiased, they cannot take public stances on controversial issues o Robert Bork, in the 80’s, was nominated by Reagan to the Supreme Court, however, because he had taken public stances on controversial issues in the past, he was not confirmed to the Supreme Court by the Senate


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Allison Fischer University of Alabama

"I signed up to be an Elite Notetaker with 2 of my sorority sisters this semester. We just posted our notes weekly and were each making over $600 per month. I LOVE StudySoup!"

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.