Understanding the Global Community
Understanding the Global Community IAS 2003 - 001
Popular in Understanding the Global Community
Popular in IAS
This 3 page Class Notes was uploaded by Michael Pullin on Sunday February 28, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to IAS 2003 - 001 at University of Oklahoma taught by Alan L. McPherson in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 46 views. For similar materials see Understanding the Global Community in IAS at University of Oklahoma.
Reviews for Understanding the Global Community
Report this Material
What is Karma?
Karma is the currency of StudySoup.
You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!
Date Created: 02/28/16
IAS Understanding the Global Community 2/15 IAS last time:kony 2012/race/humanitarianism/racism today: "charitable industrial complex"?/philanthropy and power -Kony 2012 campaign: how it depicted the situation in Africa in white man savior light -trying to raise awareness for issues involving people other than ourselves should be done so taht it doesn't become a colonial or post colonial solution that could complicate the problem further. -supporting local eforts to solve the problem instead of asssuming they are helpless victims -in the video it was only the narrator and not the voices of the people going through those hardships -Main points raised by Buffet? angry at the industrial complex because of their search for profit when doing philathropic projects. What is in it for us? -Main points raised in Buchanan's reply? best way for these places to do good is through philanthropic organizations; make them more efficient so the money goes where it is needed; eliminate extraneous costs. -Do you agree with either, both, or neither and why? I agree with both because I think that many comapanies give to charity only when they are guaranteed a return on their investment but I also think that philanthropic organizations do good in the world however they need to be more efficient in getting all the money to whoever is reveiving it. -other points: charitiy is an industry/business rather than a nonprofit organization, all businesses exist for themselves; heavy focus on returning investments, self perpetuation, administrative bloat -Self interested motives: conscience laundering -philanthropic colonialism: ignorant of the context of the situation; legitimizes/expands power of philanthropists -Buchanan: no solutions from Buffet; dont throw the baby out w/ bath water, relative or absolute growth? -people use philanthropy more as a business -Philanthropy: cause or effect of inequality? -solution to or perpetuator of inequality? 2/17 Last time: humanitarianism, philanthropy, and power -Today: inequality and citizenship -Do we need to reduce social inequality? If so how do we do this? -Local level: community based approaches specific to local needs -Some people expect to do nothing and get the benefits. -Some nordic countries have almost no inequality due to socialist type systems. -Larger countries don't use this b/c of capitalist systems and larger/more diverse populations. -Massive taxes and redistribution as benefits is appealing to many people aka socialism. -Citizenship -Regulatory measures -Interest groups/advocacy groups = collective actions -Public opinion factor -Systemic change -Possible radical factor 2/22 IAS Professor changeover -History repeats itself -History is essential to understanding something -Certain moments in time are turning points. -Zero sum game -Is history a roadmap of progress? - 2/24 IAS Income diparity was relatively similar in the year 1500 but in 2003 income disparity is very dissimilar with western europe at $19,912 and africa at $6,516. -Colonialism: subterfuge/local leaders, external influence (direct), removing native population, resource extraction, cultural control, assimilation, settlers, trade, competition between global powers, -Kinds: settler/non-settler,early colonialism - "god, gold, and glory". -competition between countries and more specifically monarchs -less religious fervor by the 19th century -european powers scramble to claim teritory in africa. -By 1900 Africa is divied up between Britain, France, German, Portugal, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Boer, Turkey. -Mercantilism is falling out of favor and capitalism is on the rise.
Are you sure you want to buy this material for
You're already Subscribed!
Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'