New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here


by: Dr. Simeon Wiza


Dr. Simeon Wiza
GPA 3.96


Almost Ready


These notes were just uploaded, and will be ready to view shortly.

Purchase these notes here, or revisit this page.

Either way, we'll remind you when they're ready :)

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Course

Popular in Physics 2

This 11 page Class Notes was uploaded by Dr. Simeon Wiza on Wednesday September 9, 2015. The Class Notes belongs to PHYS 554 at University of Washington taught by Staff in Fall. Since its upload, it has received 24 views. For similar materials see /class/192443/phys-554-university-of-washington in Physics 2 at University of Washington.




Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 09/09/15
Chapter 2 Baryons Cosrnology Dark Matter and Energy 21 Hubble expansion We are all aware that at the present time the universe is expanding However what will be its ultimate fate Will it continue to expand forever or will the expansion slow and nally reverse In order to see what role the constituent matter and energy 7 baryons photons neutrinos and other stuff not yet identi ed 7 of our universe may play in answering this question we explore their effects in an expanding homogeneous and isotropic universe Consider a small test mass m which sits on the surface of a spherical chunk of this universe having radius R If the mean energy density of the universe is p then the mass contained inside the spherical volume is 4 MR gma The potential energy of the test mass as seen by an observer at the center of the sphere is MRm U 7G7 R while its kinetic energy is 2 2 dt By Hubble7s Law the expansion velocity is given by 1 1 dB 2 T 7mv2 7m 1HR where H is the Hubble constant Although the While the size of H has been debated in the past recent deterrninations give a rather precise value of 71 i 4 krnsMpc One parsec 3262 light years The total energy of the test particle is then 1 2 2 8 Etot T U EWR H 7 gan and the fate of the universe depends on the sign of this number or equivalently with the relation of the density to a critical value 3H2 pm 188 gtlt 10 29h2gcrn3 where h N 071 i 004 is today7s Hubble constant in units of 100 krnsMpc This means p g pmt continued cipansion p g pmt ultimate contraction 22 Photon baryon and neutrino contributions to rnassenergy density So how does the measured rnassenergy density of the universe match up to pent We can 1 certainly do one immediate calculation for photons You are probably aware that pho tons remained in thermal equilibrium with the matter as long as there were free protons and electrons But just as we calculated the n p lt gt d y equilibrium we can evaluate the p 6 lt gt H y equilibrium where H denotes the hydrogen atom Given the ioniza tion potential of H of 136 eV one can calculate when the photons cool to the point that photocapture can no longer ef ciently break up newly formed atoms One can show this corresponds to a temperature of about 1 eV and to a time about 380000 years after the Big Bang After this point the photons decouple from the matter as they no longer see free charges to scatter off This decoupled background of photons is now redshifted to microwave energies For the photon number density dgq 1 3 2 3 n 4 2WW 4 23T7r 408cm where 3 120206 is the Riemann zeta function and T7 the today7s cosmic microwave background temperature measured with great accuracy to be about 273 K Similarly for the energy density in photons 1 p 2 2703 expoTn 1 It follows that photons contribute only 00000485 of the closure density sz w N 46 gtlt 10 34gcm3 Now what we did in BBN allows us to estimate the baryonic or nucleonic contribution to the p as well The baryon to photon number density is 77 which either BBN or cosmic microwave background studies nds to be 773 59 i 08 gtlt10 10 770MB 614 i 025 gtlt 1010 So these values are in great agreement Using the CMB value we then nd nmdems nap13717 251 gtlt 10 7cm3 and thus multiplying by the average nucleon mass a detail 7 but we know the np ratio is 17 for doing this average p1 419 gtlt 10 31gcm3 00442th That is baryons provide only 44 of the closure mass Clearly the electron contribution to p p5 6m57mNpb is then neglible about 2 gtlt10 5 of pmt comparable to the photon contribution One can count the visible77 nucleons by integrating over all of the luminous matter in stars and gas clouds and by making some model assumptions that take into account simulations of the behavior of the interstellar medium etc It should be appreciated that our two tests of p17 are from the rst three minutes and from the time of recombination say 400000 y post BBN So it is quite an interesting question to ask where those baryons are now more than 10 by later There is a nice summary of this problem by Joseph Silk which will be posted on the web site It deals with dark matter in general but recounts the baryon number inventory as part of the survey Joe7s estimates are all in units of the closure density About 00026 is in the spheroid stars 7 those in the galactic bulge and surround halo 7 or Population ll stars these are old stars found especially in the stellar halo of the galaxy including globular clusters and isolated binary stars with low metallicity often of the order of 1100 11000 of solar eg typically with compositions by mass of 75 hydrogen 2499 He and 001 metals About 00015 in disk stars 7 the disk is the at wispy spiral structure of our galaxy and others 7 and cold gas These are the Population 1 stars which range from old to young with roughly solar metallicity eg 70 hydrogen 28 He and 2 metals About 00026 in intracluster gas in rich clusters which can be mapped in x rays as being in a cluster with star activities keeps the gas warm About 001 0015 or 24 50 of p17 makes up a warmhot low density intergalactic medium 7 an estimate based both on large scale numerical simulations of the inter galactic medium and by observations of excess soft x ray emission The mechanism warming the gas is gravitational due to shock waves that propagate into the inter galactic medium from the peripheries of galaxies galaxy groups and galaxy clusters Simulations also suggest there may be some cold intergalactic gas 7 this stuff normally would form stars or fall into the gravitational wells of galaxies at least So this would be the residuals remaining in the ISM Theory suggests this contributes no more that 0008 of the closure density So adding up the components one gets totals in the range of 002 003 of the closure density 7 perhaps 50 75 of p17 can be accounted for plausibly Most of the above inventory is in the intergalactic medium Roughly half of the baryons are not visible 7 though whether there is a baryon inventory problem is a matter of whom one talks with Presumably these nucleons are some place 7 perhaps nonluminous gas clouds 7 because we believe BBN and because the BBN prediction for 77 is now con rmed by CMB results This problem is sometimes called the dark baryons problem 7 though there are even more intriguing dark77 problems A second dark problem has to do with large scale gravitational interactions of galaxies7 galaxy clusters7 etc For some time it has been clear that the total p is much larger than that coming from photons and baryons and electrons For example7 Doppler studies of the rotation rates of spiral galaxies indicate that these systems are much more massive than their luminosities seem to suggest prot N 2Opvis This is too large a discrepancy to attribute just to the dark baryons The origin of the dark matter77 responsible for this discrepancy is a matter of current study there are several pos sibilities But regardless of the origin of the dark matter7 it appears that the matterenergy density of our universe is a lot closer to pmt than one would guess from our calculations of pb and p7 Just as we have a OMB7 there will be a relic neutrino spectrum left over from the big bang These neutrinos would have decoupled when temperatures were slightly above 1 MeV Since that rst second of the big bang7 no further interactions have occurred If we had some means to detect these neutrinos7 they would tell us about conditions at that very early time7 eg7 their temperature uctuations probably exceeding tiny over the sky would tell us about the structure of the universe at 1 sec We do the calculation of the neutrino contribution to p making two assumptions First is the assumption that we have three avors thus 6 neutrinos in all7 as the standard model tells us7 all of which are light We will see that this is know from both cosmology7 and from a combination of tritium B decay and recent discoveries of neutrino oscillations The upper bound on the masses of the light neutrinos is about 1 eV With this assumption neutrinos are relativistic when they decoupled It follows that each neutrino avor eg7 V5 and De contributes n 7 g 7 3C3T327r2 V 2703 MaTV 1 It thus follows 3 T 711 llt gt3n7 What about TV In the very early universe electrons7 positrons7 neutrinos7 and photons would all be relativistic and in equilibrium7 characterized by a single temperature Then there is an epoch around 1 MeV when the neutrinos have decoupled7 but the electrons are relativistic and in equilibrium with the photons Let the temperature of this epoch be called T Still sometime later the positrons and electrons annihilate into two ys This will clearly heat the photons It can be shown the constancy of the entropy then relates the new T7 after annihilation to TV by Q 7 Ly3 T7 P3 P f P 4 where the superscripts T tell us to evaluate this at temperature T7 when the electrons were relativistic and in equilibrium with the photons Thus p2 dag 41 e 2773515PMT7 1 8 l It follows that Tyi 4 13 ew Thus today7s cosmic neutrino background temperature is about 192 K It follows 3 4 3 71 7 gin 7 in Now consider today7 when the temperatures are low Nothing has occurred to change 7 If neutrinos were massless7 they would contribute very little to the mass energy7 clearly So lets assume they have a mass We assume that mass is large compared to today7s kinetic energy 7 that7s the only way to make them important On the other hand7 they cannot be so massive to invalidate our assumptions of relativistic neutrinos on decoupling We know this is true experimentally It follows that their contribution to the massenergy is their number density times their mass Summing over three avors pl n7imy 00106218LVVZ We will see later that the maximum of the sum over neutrino masses7 using only laboratory and neutrino oscillations7 is 66 eV And the minimum from the neutrino mass difference measured with atmospheric neutrinos is 0055 eV Using h071 we nd 00011 ngpcm39t g 014 So two things are important about this First7 there is neutrino dark matter Second7 based on laboratory data only7 it could be signi cant7 though never more than 17 the closure density It turns out that the large scale structure of our universe is sensitive to neutrino mass a topic that will likely come up next quarter Current analyses that take into account large scale structure surveys7 the OMB7 and other cosmological tests appear to require that the sum of neutrino masses cannot exceed 1 eV Thus7 while more model dependent7 one concludes 00011 g pVpcn39t g 0026 That is7 neutrinos could be about as important as the visible baryons in the universe7s massenergy budget7 but not more 23 Dark matter We have gone through the calculation of the cosmological density of baryonic matter from the theory of BBN and the measurements of light element abundances in reasonable detail We have also mentioned the CMB constraint on 77 the baryon to photon ratio This comes from an analysis of temperature uctuations in the Cosmic Microwave Background black body spectrum 7 which Eric Agol will likely discuss in detail in his cosmology course7 but we will also summarize below Temperature anisotropies are found at the level of 1 part in 105 and involve a typical angular size of about one degree One can understand the general physics relatively simply First7 the observers very carefully measure the temperature of the black body radiation as a function of solid angle7 plotting the very small variations in this temperature as a function of multipolarity In a Legendre expansion the Z of the multipole maps into distance the higher the Z for a peak in the power spectrum7 the more rapid the variation with change of solid angle The picture of structure formation is that dark matter seeds 7 areas of higher density 7 form the gravitational potential into which ordinary matter falls This picture presumes that there is some spectrum of density uctuations associated with early cosmology Ordi nary or baryonic matter acts differently from the dark matter because it not only responds to gravity7 but also interacts with radiation Gravity causes ordinary matter to ow into potential wells radiation pressure increases in regions of higher density and thus acts to resist strong compression of ordinary matter The result are acoustic oscillations of the or dinary matter that re ect the time scale 7 the time matter has had to ow since the Big Bang There are a couple of processes that connect temperature variations in the CMB to density uctuations7 and thus to the structure ofthe universe at recombination The most important physics7 at least on smaller scales of most interest to us7 is the heating and cooling associated with the interactions between ordinary matter and radiation7 as that matter is acoustically compressed or rare ed lf matter ows into a gravitational potential and achieves a higher density7 some of that kinetic energy associated with the in ow will be converted into heating of the plasma Thus a hot spot in the CMB at small scales indicates a high density region7 while a cold spot indicates a rare ed region There are a couple of other effects that can also alter the temperature One7 the Sachs Wolfe7 effect has to do with the gravitational red shift If a photon comes out of a region of high density 7 and thus from deeper in the gravitational well 7 it will loose more energy 7 opposite ofthe effect describe above This effect becomes more effective on larger scales7 as a large scale overdensity generates a stronger gravitational potential and a larger gravitational red shift Thus it has a different signature Such temperature uctuations7 and their connections to density uctuations7 probe the dy namic processes that govern structure formation The kinetic energy of in ow is transfered to the plasma by processes like Compton scattering This provides a radiation pressure that resists matter ow and can halt that ow Likewise if a ow is reversed motion of matter outward in a gravitational well must lead to a cooling of the plasma by energy conservation The timescale for possible acoustic oscillations 7 compression and rarefaction 7 is governed by the age of the universe at recombination 380000 years This limits the size scale of uctuations if the scale is too large there is insuf cient time for matter at that scale to fully condense It is relatively easy to appreciate intuitively that the largest structures that can be seen must correspond to the largest area that can condense over the lifetime of the universe By condense here we mean reach the density where the radiation pressure just halts the ow It is helpful to think of the process as an oscillator with gravity working to compress the spring and with radiation resisting the compression and becoming more effective as the spring is compressed When a spring oscillates at the points of maximum compression and maximum rarefaction the spring is at rest If one were to 77sample77 the spring during its motion therefore the 77power would collect at these extremes At recombination of course the sampling time is xed at 380000 What varies are the springs 7 the variety of density uctuations that presumably follow some characteristic spec trum A special spring 7 a special size scale 7 are the uctuations that over 380000 years allow matter to reach the point of maximum compression Power will collect in this mode Another special mode corresponds to a size scale about half of this There the matter has time to reach the point of maximum compression be forced outward by the radiation pres sure and then again come to rest as gravity once again overcomes the diminishing radiation pressure These are the 7139 and 27139 peaks in the power spectrum One can continue forming a second compression 37139 etc Figure 2 shows 7 with somewhat diminishing clarity 7 the rst compression second rarefaction and third compression power peaks in the CMB temperature uctuations as measure by WMAP and other CMB probes The rst peak corresponds to an Z of about 200 7 an angular scale of about one degree The second cor responds to an angular size of about half a degree Peaks in the power spectrum are not seen for is much smaller than 200 7 there has not been enough time for large scale regions to compress to high density As the mechanism for the rarefaction is the interaction of radiation with ordinary matter interactions the peak structure must be sensitive to the baryon to photon ratio 77 that we introduced in our BBN discussion The baryons act as a source of inertia in the compres sion and rarefaction It should be clear that if one increases the number of baryons then the amplitudes of the oscillations should increase there is more inertia on infall that the radiation has to resist overcome and reverse This is shown in the third gure Low baryon density tends to reduce the radio of the rst two peaks corresponding to compression and rarefaction The result is in good agreement with the BBN determination as we noted earlier favoring just slightly larger values of 77 In terms of a closure density it corresponds gure 1 The NASAWM pm a the lmpmlure nuke cm swam s vex eumsmengulsxsmlssm ehoulmed yee m sexeanch Mame red s w 1mm Thls mm amny ucmeums at the me 0 1m smattering whmh g m x m umelhe Mme drmnhmeum end elm me energy m a New es mam mm mm ms 0 Mammy 80 Boom98 E CBI Maxima l DASI 1 0 l multipole Figure 2 The measured power spectrum for CMB temperature uctuations From Wayne Hu7s Web page to a plumm of about 00442 Both the OMB and the BBN calculations 7 based on radically different physics governing the universe at very different times 7 give similar results We noted before this implies that about half of the baryonic matter is nonlurninous Among the possible hiding places are MACHOS 7 rnassive cornpact halo objects being probed in gravitational rnicrolensing searches 7 and matter hidden in nonlurninous gas clouds There are also a couple of reliable determinations of the total matter density The height of the rst acoustic peak in the CMB spectrum is quite sensitive to the matter density7 as shown in the fourth gure The position of this peak requires pM N 0268 i 0018 fraction of the critical density This is by far our best measure of the sum of baryonic and nonbaryonic matter in the universe Red shift surveys measurements of the shape of the power spectrum for large scale rnatter inhornogeneities also probe this quantity7 giving pM N 040 i 006 These results are in reasonable agreement with each other7 as well as with the values derived by combining the known baryon density with the baryon to total rnass density ratio in clus ters The sensitivity of the CMB to pM can be understood First7 increasing pM should lead to an increase in the scale over which density perturbations can grow7 until recornbination strengthening the dark rnatter potential wells will allow baryonic matter to be pulled in more quickly and from further away Second7 it should reduce he power in the acoustic peaks vis ible matter will be pulled deeper into the potential well7 where the trarnpoline like rebound from radiation pressure will be stronger Thus increasing pM with mamm5 xed has quite a different effect from increasing plumm with the dark rnatter density xed Distance Type la supernovae can be used as standard candles 7 even at large distances and thus at past times 7 to probe the Hubble expansion These indicate that in addition to dark rnatter7 space the vacuum is characterized by some dark energy This dark energy is a sort of negative pressure working against gravity7 causing the universe to expand more rapidly than it would due to matter along They nd pA 7 pM N 046 Again7 this sensitivity is physically very plausible Matter retards expansion7 dark energy accelerates it Thus the expansion rate should test the difference Actually7 one can ap preciate that things are actually richer7 as cold matter and dark energy evolve differently cosrnologically Since we know how the former evolves as the universe stretches7 careful 12 measurements can determine the equation of state of the dark energy Distant supernovae are the tool for probing the condition of the universe at earlier times Combined cosmological analyses also give p N 10 i 004 That is7 the universe is close to critical density Combined with the above results7 one de duces that pM 0277 again with 0044 of this being baryons visible and otherwise and the rest something beyond the standard model like the lightest stable supersymmetric par ticle The remainder is the dark energy7 pA 073 7 whose nature is simply not understood


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Jennifer McGill UCSF Med School

"Selling my MCAT study guides and notes has been a great source of side revenue while I'm in school. Some months I'm making over $500! Plus, it makes me happy knowing that I'm helping future med students with their MCAT."

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.