New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Case No. A99A1899

by: Varsha Mandiga

Case No. A99A1899 BUSA 2106

Varsha Mandiga
GPA 4.0

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

Case Briefs
Legal Environment Of Business
Class Notes
BUSA, 2106, GSU, Ryan
25 ?




Popular in Legal Environment Of Business

Popular in Department

This 2 page Class Notes was uploaded by Varsha Mandiga on Thursday March 10, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to BUSA 2106 at Georgia State University taught by Grelecki in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 55 views.


Reviews for Case No. A99A1899


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 03/10/16
Varsha Mandiga KMART CORPORATION v. LARSEN et al. FACTS Case No. A99A1899. When: Decided: September 28, 1999 Where: Court of Appeals of Georgia. Who: Appellant ­ Kinney, Kemp, Sponcler, Joiner & Tharpe, F. Gregory Melton, Dalton      Appellees – Willis, McKenzie & Long, Charles J. Willis, LaGrange     BLACKBURN, Judge.  What: In this premises liability action, Kmart Corporation appeals, following a jury trial, from a              judgment in favor of Kathryn and Vernon Larsen, contending the trial court erred by charging              the jury on res ipsa loquitur. We affirm  ISSUE(S)  The jury was presented two theories of the case.   The shelves fell either as a result of Ms.  Larsen, who was 85 years old, having bumped into them or as a result of Kmart's negligence  which was inferred by res ipsa loquitur. The evidence showed that the Larsens were shopping at a Kmart store in LaGrange.    Ms. Larsen had turned back down the aisle, she felt something hit her on the head, and  shelving fell down on and around her. Ms. Larsen suffered various injuries as a result.   Ms.  Larsen could not recall whether she bumped into the shelving, but she did not think she had.  The trial court charged the jury on premises liability, negligence, res ipsa loquitur, and  plaintiff's duty of care.  RULE(S)  Res ipsa loquitur ­ Cases where there is no evidence of consequence showing negligence on  the part of the defendant. ANAYLSIS   The doctrine authorizes, but does not require, the jury to infer facts from the circumstances in which the injury occurred, thereby filling the evidentiary gap.  o A charge on res ipsa loquitur is not precluded by an unsupported contention that the  plaintiff was negligent.   No evidence was produced from which a jury could infer that Ms. Larsen contributed to the  incident. Moreover, the shelving was in the exclusive control of Brenda, the Kmart employee  who was rearranging the shelves at that very moment. Brenda did not testify at trial.   Res  ipsa loquitur is appropriate here as, ordinarily, a person walking down an aisle is not struck  by falling shelves unless someone was negligent.  CONCLUSION  The res ipsa loquitur charge did not prevent the jury from considering Kmart's theory that Ms. Larsen caused her own injuries. Kmart's theory was supported by a charge on the plaintiff's  duty of ordinary care. The jury determined that the evidence did not support Kmart's theory.   The trial court properly charged the jury on res ipsa loquitur.  ­ Judgment affirmed. 2


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Jennifer McGill UCSF Med School

"Selling my MCAT study guides and notes has been a great source of side revenue while I'm in school. Some months I'm making over $500! Plus, it makes me happy knowing that I'm helping future med students with their MCAT."

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.