New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Notes on Animal Rights

by: Sara Merkle

Notes on Animal Rights PHI2630

Marketplace > Florida State University > Culture > PHI2630 > Notes on Animal Rights
Sara Merkle
Ethical Issues/Life Choices
Marcela Herdova

Almost Ready


These notes were just uploaded, and will be ready to view shortly.

Purchase these notes here, or revisit this page.

Either way, we'll remind you when they're ready :)

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

These notes are from the 2 articles that were read from the textbook as well as a few notes from lecture.
Ethical Issues/Life Choices
Marcela Herdova
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Ethical Issues/Life Choices

Popular in Culture

This 3 page Class Notes was uploaded by Sara Merkle on Monday September 28, 2015. The Class Notes belongs to PHI2630 at Florida State University taught by Marcela Herdova in Summer 2015. Since its upload, it has received 34 views. For similar materials see Ethical Issues/Life Choices in Culture at Florida State University.

Similar to PHI2630 at FSU


Reviews for Notes on Animal Rights


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 09/28/15
Ethical Issues amp Life Choices Notes written in black are notes taken from the textbook Notes written in pink are notes taken during lecture Red indicates a term that is being defined All Animals are Equal Peter Singer Speciesism is a term used by Singer to describe a prejudice in favor of the interest of members of one s own species and against those of another species Morally equivalent to racism or sexism Similar to the case of women s rights in the 170018005 Saying that animals should have rights equal to those of humans would be irrational however the rights of animals go along with the capabilities that animals have 9T0 say that dogs should have the rights to vote would be comparable to saying a man should have a right to an abortion Comparing Speciesism to racism racism is wrong because skin color gives no insight into someone s morality or intellect EVEN SO possessing a higher intellect then another does not entitle a human to use another for their ends So why shouldn t this principle apply to animals as well Basic questions involving animal rights 1 Do nonhuman animals have rights 2 If so what rights do they have 3 Is it morally permissible to treat nonhuman animals as objects Ieremy Bentham 9Capacity for suffering is vital in giving equality consideration A mouse does not have an interest in being kicked down the road because it will suffer if it is Some claims against animal rights a being must be autonomousquot must be a member of the communityquot must have the ability to respect the rights of othersquot must possess a sense of justicequot animals differ from humans in many waysquot Animals amp Research Most human beings are speciesists by nature Practices today reveal that this is true In Britain experimenters are required to report the number of scientific proceduresquot preformed on animals In 1988 there were 35 million reported cases The Animal Welfare Act was passed which doesn t account for many animals US Office of Technology Assessment OTA estimates that animals used in experiments are about 10 to 100 million annually Ethical Issues amp Life Choices A list of statistical evidence involving animals used in experiments worldwide can be found on page 6 of this article on Blackboard The suffering of animals deserves the same consideration as does parallel suffering of humans Upshot species membership as such cannot determine moral status Sentience is the capacity to experience pain and pleasure This is both necessary and sufficient for having interest A very small portion of animal experiments can be regarded as medical research Mostly animals are used to test cosmetics shampoos dyes etc Experimenters usually do not deny that the animals suffer Proposal experiments serving no direct and urgent purpose stop immediately and in the remaining fields of research we should wherever possible seek to replace experiments that involve animals with alternative methods that do notquot Would we be prepared to let thousands of humans die if they could be saved by a single experiment on a single animal Unfortunately this is never the case and the question at hand is purely hypothetical Are experimenters willing to run experiments on mentally deficient human beings seeing as they are morally equal to animals On those premises an experiment cannot be justified unless it is so important that it would also be carried out on a mentally deficient human as well Only in rare cases does one life save thousands On eatingtorturing animals Consequentially there is no moral difference between eating animals and torturing and killing them for fun If you are dissonant in your thinking you can either embrace both or you can change your stance on one of them Eating meat is socially acceptable many people do so but torture is notquot Fallacy of common practice Eating meat is more naturalquot Fallacy natural does not equal moral Are Zoos Morally Permissible Article by Tom Regan p392 Zoos are not morally permissible here s why Utilitarianism Can animals suffer Interests of animals must figure in the moral assessment of zoos o Interests wild animals have a Freedom of movement a Adequate nutrition Ethical Issues amp Life Choices 9 Appropriate environment To name a few However you must also take into account the interests of those affected by zoos Speculation vs fact a Entirely too much to try and calculate the positive and negative effects on all beings involved The theory requires more knowledge than humans are capable of finding quotThis theory is bull when applied to zoosquot The Rights View 1 Moral assessment of zoos much be carried out against the backdrop of the rights of animals 2 When making this assessment zoos as they exist are not morally permissible Animals are aware of the world and of what happens to them separately from their utility to us They have biological psychological and social needs Should not use humans as means to an end why should we treat animals differently Just as there is no master sex and no master race there is no master species Are animals in zoos treated with appropriate respect Freedom of animals is compromised o Confining an animal to a space is only okay to do as long as it is in their best interest it gets hairy however when it comes to what is considered best interestquot in that situation


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Janice Dongeun University of Washington

"I used the money I made selling my notes & study guides to pay for spring break in Olympia, Washington...which was Sweet!"

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.