New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Markets/Morals and Immanuel Kant

by: Thomas nelson

Markets/Morals and Immanuel Kant PHL 2008

Marketplace > High Point University > PHIL-Philosophy > PHL 2008 > Markets Morals and Immanuel Kant
Thomas nelson

GPA 3.5

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

These notes cover the week of March 13th.
Social Ethics
Thaddeus M. Ostrowski
Class Notes
Social Ethics
25 ?




Popular in Social Ethics

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy

This 2 page Class Notes was uploaded by Thomas nelson on Friday March 18, 2016. The Class Notes belongs to PHL 2008 at High Point University taught by Thaddeus M. Ostrowski in Spring 2016. Since its upload, it has received 20 views. For similar materials see Social Ethics in PHIL-Philosophy at High Point University.

Similar to PHL 2008 at

Popular in PHIL-Philosophy


Reviews for Markets/Morals and Immanuel Kant


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 03/18/16
Thomas Nelson  2 arguments in favor of free market 1) Utilitarianism – Maximizing happiness (consequentialist argument) 2) Libertarian – Respect rights and self­ownership of people involved (non­ consequentialist argument)  2 arguments against free market 1) Free market isn’t free or fair  You have to be informed beforehand 2) Degradation of “higher goods”  Certain things shouldn’t be for sale  Children, self/body/labor of body  2 ways Locke “disappoints” Libertarians 1) Rights are inalienable (we don’t own ourselves absolutely) 2) Social contracts   What is Enlightenment? o Emerging from immaturity o Thinking for yourself o Having the courage to use your own reason o “Dare to know!”  3 major works (critiques) o Critiques of Pure Reason (metaphysics, the true) o Critique of Practical Reason (ethics, the good) o Critique of Judgments (aesthetic, the beautiful)  Also wrote “The Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” (excerpt)  What gives an act moral worth? o We are responsible for our motive, not consequences – they are beyond our  control (we can only control what we do and why we do it) o The belief that people are autonomous, rational beings with intrinsic value → So  people shouldn’t be used  To be “autonomous” is to be “a law unto oneself” o “Auto” means “self” and “nomos” means “law” o Free or “self­legislating” (acting on laws one gives oneself)  “Heteronomous” is opposite – controlled by something outside o Slave to desire/inclination, follow the crowd, or blindly obey rules/law  To be autonomous is not to do whatever you want, it is to be able to step back from  desires or inclinations and choose how to act (or on which to get)  Bentham was wrong that pleasure and pain are our “sovereign masters”  What is the right motive? o It is acting out of duty, a concern or respect for the objective moral law o It is doing something because it is the right thing to do  He does not trust people’s feelings because they come and go (aren’t constant) Thomas Nelson  Shopkeeper and child shopper example → Did duty for the wrong reason (to protect his  reputation, not because it is the right thing to do)  Contrasts with Utilitarianism both in what it names as an intrinsic good o Happiness (Pleasure) vs. Human person   Non­consequentialist or Deontological theory MOTIVE ACT CONSEQUENCES JOHN STUART  Greater good MILL IMMANUEL  Act out of duty Act according to duty (in  KANT conformity with duty)  The Categorical Imperative o Necessary or required in moral sense → command  Hypothetical vs. Categorical  o Hypothetical is conditional takes form of an “if… then” statement (instrumental,  extrinsic) o Categorical is absolute (intrinsic)  2 forms of the Categorical Imperative 1) “Act only on that maxim that you can will as a universal law”  Not about consequences, but  Avoiding making oneself and exception  Avoiding contradicting oneself or acting in a self­defeating way  Not the “golden rule” (that is a hypothetical imperative)  Ex: Lying to spare someone’s feelings (maxim) → People would lie all the time, so people couldn’t trust anything people said, therefore, people’s  feelings would not be spared 2) “Always treat humanity, whether in your own person or that of another, never  simply as a means but always at the same time as an end”  Always respect people as beings of intrinsic worth (don’t treat oneself or  anything else as things)  No prostitution


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Bentley McCaw University of Florida

"I was shooting for a perfect 4.0 GPA this semester. Having StudySoup as a study aid was critical to helping me achieve my goal...and I nailed it!"

Anthony Lee UC Santa Barbara

"I bought an awesome study guide, which helped me get an A in my Math 34B class this quarter!"

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."

Parker Thompson 500 Startups

"It's a great way for students to improve their educational experience and it seemed like a product that everybody wants, so all the people participating are winning."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.