New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

Topics in Contemporary Mathematics

by: Braeden Lind

Topics in Contemporary Mathematics MA 103

Marketplace > North Carolina State University > Mathematics (M) > MA 103 > Topics in Contemporary Mathematics
Braeden Lind
GPA 3.93

Chad Mangum

Almost Ready


These notes were just uploaded, and will be ready to view shortly.

Purchase these notes here, or revisit this page.

Either way, we'll remind you when they're ready :)

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

Chad Mangum
Class Notes
25 ?




Popular in Course

Popular in Mathematics (M)

This 3 page Class Notes was uploaded by Braeden Lind on Thursday October 15, 2015. The Class Notes belongs to MA 103 at North Carolina State University taught by Chad Mangum in Fall. Since its upload, it has received 8 views. For similar materials see /class/223699/ma-103-north-carolina-state-university in Mathematics (M) at North Carolina State University.

Similar to MA 103 at NCS

Popular in Mathematics (M)


Reviews for Topics in Contemporary Mathematics


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 10/15/15
Study Guide MA103 Test 1 Test 91012 I Describingapplying 4 voting methods a Plurality Method i Contains plurality candidate ii Definition 1 Determines election winner by picking the plurality candidate iii Satisfies Majority amp Monotonicity iv Violates IIA amp Condorcet V Method only looks at first place votes vi Problem with plurality method manipulation by insincere voting b Borda Count Method i Definition 1 Points are assigned to each ranking in preference schedule ii ADVANTAGE POINT takes into account ENTIRE preference schedule not just 1st place iii Satisfies Monotonicity iv Violates Condorcet Majority IIA v used in many sports votes c MPC Method of Pairwise Comparisons i Definition quotmatch up every candidate against every other candidate individually 1 Whichever candidate wins the match up gets 1 point 2 Whoever has most points in the end wins ii Satisfies Condorcet Majority Monotonicity iii Violates IIA iv can lead to ties 1 tiebreakers situation dependent a 1st way run 2 101 method on preference schedule winner of that method wins tiebreaker b 2 1 way use Extended andor Recursive Method to eliminate last place then run method again c 3ml way many other options 2 Total comparisons in an election ofN candidate N1lNl P Plurality with Elimination Method i Definition 1 Continue to do plurality method several times in a row until PLURALITY CANDIDATE is the MAJORITY CANDIDATE 2 In each round candidate with fewest 1st place votes is eliminated The remaining are retallied ii Satisfies Majority iii Violates Condorcet IIA Monotonicity II Stating 4 fairness criteria a Majority Criterion i If candidate X has majority gt5 0 ofvotes of 1St place votes then candidate X should win b Condorcet Criterion i If candidate X is preferred by votes over each of other candidates headtohead then candidate X should win c IIA Criterion i If candidate X wins an election and in a recount one of the nonwinning candidates is removed then candidate X should win in recount d Monotonicity Criterion i If candidate X wins an election and a reelection has changes that favor candidate X and only candidate X then candidate X should win III Describingapplying extended and recursive methods for ranking rank in 155 2nd 3rd 4th nAth a Extended method i Definition rank candidates after ONE application ofwhichever voting method used ii 1 v Nquotth b Recursive method i Definition applying SAME method OVER AND OVER with different inputs each time In particular the outcome of one application of the method depends on the previous one ii Process 1 Apply chosen method MPC PWE Plurality Borda Count 2 Use it to determine a WINNER REMOVE WINNER and obtain new preference schedule with one fewer candidate Apply same method again to the NEW schedule 539quot 1 5 Pick a quotnew winner 9 aka 2 1 place 6 Continue process IV Key terms a Plurality candidate i The candidate with the most first place votes b Majority candidate i The candidate with a majority of 1st place votes c Preference schedule i Tally ofvotes d Insincere voting i When people vote differently than the way they actually feel usually occurs when people have some knowledge beforehand of the possible outcomes of an election V Knowingstating Arrow s Impossibility Theorem a There does not eXist a voting method that satisfies all fairness criteria VI Knowing the HW a OK VII Knowing the following table 9Criterion Majority Condorcet Monotonicity satisfies violates satisfies Borda Count How to figure out problems for Borda Count Method 0 maximum number ofpoints if voters gave candidate 1st place 4 of voters o 4 being an example 0 minimum number ofpoints 1 ofvoters 0 total points of voters5pts 4pts 3pts 2pts 1pt


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

25 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Janice Dongeun University of Washington

"I used the money I made selling my notes & study guides to pay for spring break in Olympia, Washington...which was Sweet!"

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.