New User Special Price Expires in

Let's log you in.

Sign in with Facebook


Don't have a StudySoup account? Create one here!


Create a StudySoup account

Be part of our community, it's free to join!

Sign up with Facebook


Create your account
By creating an account you agree to StudySoup's terms and conditions and privacy policy

Already have a StudySoup account? Login here

chapter 2 review notes

by: Tianyi Zhang

chapter 2 review notes Bus 391

Tianyi Zhang
GPA 3.25
Business Law
Jon Saffold

Almost Ready


These notes were just uploaded, and will be ready to view shortly.

Purchase these notes here, or revisit this page.

Either way, we'll remind you when they're ready :)

Preview These Notes for FREE

Get a free preview of these Notes, just enter your email below.

Unlock Preview
Unlock Preview

Preview these materials now for free

Why put in your email? Get access to more of this material and other relevant free materials for your school

View Preview

About this Document

I fill up the answers of professor's outline of chapter 2
Business Law
Jon Saffold
Test Prep (MCAT, SAT...)
75 ?




Popular in Business Law

Popular in Business Administration

This 7 page Test Prep (MCAT, SAT...) was uploaded by Tianyi Zhang on Monday October 12, 2015. The Test Prep (MCAT, SAT...) belongs to Bus 391 at University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee taught by Jon Saffold in Summer 2015. Since its upload, it has received 63 views. For similar materials see Business Law in Business Administration at University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.

Similar to Bus 391 at UWM


Reviews for chapter 2 review notes


Report this Material


What is Karma?


Karma is the currency of StudySoup.

You can buy or earn more Karma at anytime and redeem it for class notes, study guides, flashcards, and more!

Date Created: 10/12/15
CHAPTER 2 Courts amp Alternative Dispute Resolution Judicial Review The process by which a court decides the constitutionality of legislative enactments and actions by the executive branch Marbury v Madison 1803 It is emphatically the province and duty of the courts to say what the law is So if the law be in opposition to the Constitution the Court must determine which of these con icting rules governs the case This is the very essence of judicial duty JURISDICTION Jurisdiction I I I I I I I The authority of a court to hear and decide a specific action Jurisdiction has many dimensions including Personal Jurisdiction The authority of a court to hear and decide a dispute involving the particular parties before it Subject Matter Jurisdiction The authority of a court to hear and decide the particular dispute before it Original Jurisdiction The authority of a court to hear and decide a dispute in the first instance Generally speaking trial courts are courts of original jurisdiction although the Supreme Court of the United States and the highest courts of many of the states have original jurisdiction over a few types of disputes Appellate Jurisdiction The authority of a court to review a prior decision in the same case made by another court PERSONAL JURISDICTION In Personam Jurisdiction over any person or business that resides in a certain geographic area For example state trail court have jurisdiction over residentsinclude business of a particular area of the state such as county or district A state highest court state supreme court has jurisdiction over all residents within the state Out of State Defendants 0 Longarm statute a court can exercise personal jurisdiction over certain out of state defendants based on activity that took place within the state 0 Sufficient Minimum Contacts the defendants must have enough connection to the state for the judge to conclude that it is fair for the state to exercise power over the defendants For example out od state defendant caused an car accident within the state In Rem Jurisdiction Jurisdiction over the thing A court can also exercise jurisdiction over property that is located its boundaries For example the ownership of a boat in dry dock in orida The boat is owned by ohio resident Book 29 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Limitation on the types of cases a court can hear Defined in the statute or constitution creating the court Limited vs General In both federal and state court system have limited and general jurisdiction A court of general jurisdiction can decide a broad array of issues For example state trail court federal district court Limited jurisdiction probate courts a state court handles only the disposition of a person s assets and obligations after that person s death including the issue of custody and guard ship of children Original amp Appellate Original jurisdiction court of first instance trial court where lawsuit begin trial are take place evidence is presented For example district court Appellate reviewing or appellate Concurrent amp Exclusive Exclusive only one court can hear the case State or federal courts Concurrent more courts can hear the case JURISDICTION OF FEDERAL COURTS Federal Question Jurisdiction Limited power only when a federal questions a person who claim that his constitutional rights have been violatedinvolved and When there is diversity of citizenship Diversity Jurisdiction The plaintiff and defendant are residents of different states The dollar amount in controversy must exceed 75000 For purposes of diversity jurisdiction a corporation is a citizen of both 1 its state of incorporation and 2 the state of its principal place of business if the two are not the same JURISDICTION IN CYBERSPACE Personal jurisdiction is traditionally a function of geography where one or more party resides or where the alleged wrong occurred The Internet makes geographic distinctions difficult and potentially meaningless An increasing number of courts are resolving personal jurisdiction issues by applying a sliding scale that makes it more likely that a court will exercise jurisdiction over a distant defendant the more business that defendant conducts over the Internet and the more interactive its web presence is in the jurisdiction VENUE AND STANDING Venue Most right location for a trial Venue in a civil case is Where the defendant reside but in the criminal case is Where the crime occurred Standing to Sue Sufficient stake in a matter to justify seeking relief through the court system Harm Causationa causal connection between the conduct complained of and the injury Remedy make up for the injury suffered Case or Controversy Ripeness STATE COURT SYSTEMS Trial Courts Trial courts are where all litigation other than that conducted through administrative agencies begins Trial courts have either general jurisdiction meaning that they are empowered to consider any matter before them or limited jurisdiction meaning that they are only empowered to hear certain types of cases or cases in which the amount in controversy is above below or between specified bounds Appellate Courts Every state has at least one appellate court to which a litigant who was unsuccessful at the trial court may appeal for relief 0 Appellate courts limit their review to questions of law rather than questions of fact State Supreme Courts Most state supreme courts like the US Supreme Court have discretionary review ie they decide whether or not to consider the merits of a particular case THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM US District Courts Trial courts of general jurisdiction each state as well as the District of Columbia and certain other US territories and possessions has at least one district and some states have as many as four US Courts of Appeals Appellate courts to which litigants in the US District Courts have an automatic right to appeal ie the court of appeal must consider each appeal on its merits These courts also hear appeals from US Bankruptcy Courts and other specialized courts and in the case of the DC Circuit from federal administrative agency decisions These courts cover twelve geographic regions with a thirteenth court the Federal Circuit empowered to hear appeals from any district court involving patent law cases in which the United States is a defendant and other specified types of cases US Supreme Court The highest court in the land the US Supreme Court exercises discretionary review over all federal appellate courts as well as in some circumstances state supreme and appellate courts Most cases reach the US Supreme Court on writ of certiorari which requires that at least four justices agree the case merits the Court s review ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Negotiation Mediation Arbitration Minitrial Summary Jury Trial


Buy Material

Are you sure you want to buy this material for

75 Karma

Buy Material

BOOM! Enjoy Your Free Notes!

We've added these Notes to your profile, click here to view them now.


You're already Subscribed!

Looks like you've already subscribed to StudySoup, you won't need to purchase another subscription to get this material. To access this material simply click 'View Full Document'

Why people love StudySoup

Steve Martinelli UC Los Angeles

"There's no way I would have passed my Organic Chemistry class this semester without the notes and study guides I got from StudySoup."

Amaris Trozzo George Washington University

"I made $350 in just two days after posting my first study guide."

Jim McGreen Ohio University

"Knowing I can count on the Elite Notetaker in my class allows me to focus on what the professor is saying instead of just scribbling notes the whole time and falling behind."


"Their 'Elite Notetakers' are making over $1,200/month in sales by creating high quality content that helps their classmates in a time of need."

Become an Elite Notetaker and start selling your notes online!

Refund Policy


All subscriptions to StudySoup are paid in full at the time of subscribing. To change your credit card information or to cancel your subscription, go to "Edit Settings". All credit card information will be available there. If you should decide to cancel your subscription, it will continue to be valid until the next payment period, as all payments for the current period were made in advance. For special circumstances, please email


StudySoup has more than 1 million course-specific study resources to help students study smarter. If you’re having trouble finding what you’re looking for, our customer support team can help you find what you need! Feel free to contact them here:

Recurring Subscriptions: If you have canceled your recurring subscription on the day of renewal and have not downloaded any documents, you may request a refund by submitting an email to

Satisfaction Guarantee: If you’re not satisfied with your subscription, you can contact us for further help. Contact must be made within 3 business days of your subscription purchase and your refund request will be subject for review.

Please Note: Refunds can never be provided more than 30 days after the initial purchase date regardless of your activity on the site.