×
Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to Chemistry: The Central Science - 12 Edition - Chapter 10 - Problem 37e
Join StudySoup for FREE
Get Full Access to Chemistry: The Central Science - 12 Edition - Chapter 10 - Problem 37e

Already have an account? Login here
×
Reset your password

The Ideal-Gas Equation (Section)The Goodyear blimps, which

Chemistry: The Central Science | 12th Edition | ISBN: 9780321696724 | Authors: Theodore E. Brown; H. Eugene LeMay; Bruce E. Bursten; Catherine Murphy; Patrick Woodward ISBN: 9780321696724 27

Solution for problem 37E Chapter 10

Chemistry: The Central Science | 12th Edition

  • Textbook Solutions
  • 2901 Step-by-step solutions solved by professors and subject experts
  • Get 24/7 help from StudySoup virtual teaching assistants
Chemistry: The Central Science | 12th Edition | ISBN: 9780321696724 | Authors: Theodore E. Brown; H. Eugene LeMay; Bruce E. Bursten; Catherine Murphy; Patrick Woodward

Chemistry: The Central Science | 12th Edition

4 5 1 382 Reviews
10
5
Problem 37E

Problem 37E

The Ideal-Gas Equation (Section)

The Goodyear blimps, which frequently fly over sporting events, hold approximately 175,000 ft 3 of helium. If the gas is at 23 °C and 1.0 atm, what mass of helium is in a blimp?

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1 of 3

Social Psychology: Chapter 12  How we behave around other people  How we think about/relate to influence one another o Someone present or watching (could be physical or implied presence)  Social Influence o Several different forms o Hitler, Stalin, David Koresh  One person’s impact can have an impact on people o Social norms  Face forward in elevator  Wait in lines  Certain places where you should smoke o Persuasion  Attitudes or beliefs influenced by another person’s communication  Systematic  Appeal to reason  Reasons why best presidential candidate / lay out facts  Heuristic  Appeal to emotion o Conformity  Tendency to what others do just because they are doing it  Why we conform  Normative influence (social norms) o Want to fit it, want others approval  Informative influence o Not sure how to act; look to others to see what to do  Asch’s study of Conformity o Conformity surprisingly high given:  Unambiguous  Strangers  Low stakes for being wrong o 24% participants never conformed  Personality characteristics/ factors  Desire for consistency o Changed either attitudes/beliefs or behavior o Foot in the Door Technique  Agree to small action; comply later with larger one  Safe driver study  17% consented to large, poorly lettered “Drive Carefully” sign  Almost 100% consented to 3-inch “Be a safe driver” sign  76% consented to the large sign  Cognitive Dissonance o Behaviors influence attitudes/beliefs o Cognitive Dissonance Theory  Festinger  Inconsistency leads to discomfort, change in attitude  Menial Task o Group 1 and 2  Tell others it’s fun o Group 1 gets $1 and group 2 gets $20  Which says it’s more enjoyable o Group 1  If unable to justify attitude change how they feel about the task o Obedience  Form of compliance  People follow direct commands, usually authority figure  Milgram Experiment  Test how people are really that evil (WWII and Holocaust time period)  Completely unethical so can’t be used today  26/40 (65%) completed the experiment  Factors that affect obedience o Yale vs. office building (48%) o Multiple “teachers”  Accomplices accepted orders (65%)  Accomplices defied orders (10%)  Group Behavior: 2 extremes  Diffusion of Responsibility o If alone, responsibility is yours, if others present, divided o Smoke filled room  Informational influence o Helping Behavior  People are less likely to help when in a group than when alone  75% help if alone  53% help in a group  Deindividuation o Large groups may increase impulsive, uninhibited behaviors o Less aware of individual values (take on values of the group)  Ex: Riots o Altruism  Behavior that helps other person  Unique to humans  Reciprocal altruism  Expect something in return (seen in animals) o Cooperation  Behavior that leads to mutual benefit  Studied quite a bit  Prisoner’s dilemma (game)  At first both remain silent, eventually one will confess (b/c people are thinking only of themselves  Tit-for-tat (iterative game)  Also one with forgiveness  Watch out for cheaters  Ultimatum game  2 people  offer and accept

Step 2 of 3

Chapter 10, Problem 37E is Solved
Step 3 of 3

Textbook: Chemistry: The Central Science
Edition: 12
Author: Theodore E. Brown; H. Eugene LeMay; Bruce E. Bursten; Catherine Murphy; Patrick Woodward
ISBN: 9780321696724

Other solutions

People also purchased

Related chapters

Unlock Textbook Solution

Enter your email below to unlock your verified solution to:

The Ideal-Gas Equation (Section)The Goodyear blimps, which