Make up to $500 this semester by taking notes for StudySoup as an Elite Notetaker Apply Now

The article “Application of Radial Basis Function Neural

Statistics for Engineers and Scientists | 4th Edition | ISBN: 9780073401331 | Authors: William Navidi

Problem 8E Chapter 7.3

Statistics for Engineers and Scientists | 4th Edition

  • 2901 Step-by-step solutions solved by professors and subject experts
  • Get 24/7 help from StudySoup virtual teaching assistants
Statistics for Engineers and Scientists | 4th Edition | ISBN: 9780073401331 | Authors: William Navidi

Statistics for Engineers and Scientists | 4th Edition

4 5 0 319 Reviews
25
3
Problem 8E

The article “Application of Radial Basis Function Neural Networks in Optimization of Hard Turning of AISID2 Cold- Worked Tool Steel With a Ceramic Tool” (S. Basak. U. Dixit, and J. Davim, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2007:987-998) presents the results of an experiment in which the surface roughness (in µm) was measured for 27 D2 steel specimens and compared with the roughness predicted by a neural network model. The results are presented in the following table.

True

Value (X)

Predicted

Value (Y)

True

Value (X)

Predicted

Value (Y)

True

Value (X)

Predicted

Value (Y)

0.45

0.42

0.52

0.51

0.57

0.55

0.82

0.70

1.02

0.91

1.14

1.01

0.54

0.52

0.60

0.71

0.74

0.81

0.41

0.39

0.58

0.50

0.62

0.66

0.77

0.74

0.87

0.91

1.15

1.06

0.79

0.78

1.06

1.04

1.27

1.31

0.25

0.27

0.45

0.52

1.31

1.40

0.62

0.60

1.09

0.97

1.33

1.41

0.91

0.87

1.35

1.29

1.46

1.46

To check the accuracy of the prediction method, the linear model y = β0 + β1 x + ε is fit. If the prediction method is accurate, the value of β0 will be 0 and the value of β1 will be 1.

a. Compute the least-squares estimates  and .

b. Can you reject the null hypothesis H0: β0 = 0?

c. Can you reject the null hypothesis H0: β1 = 1?

d. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the prediction method is not accurate?

e. Compute a 95% confidence interval for the mean prediction when the true roughness is 0.8 µm.

f. Someone claims that when the true roughness is 0.8 µm, the mean prediction is only 0.75 µm. Do these data provide sufficient evidence for you to conclude that this claim is false? Explain.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1 of 3

January 17, 2017 The Nature of Reality Itself What is the nature of reality  Ontology o Realism: the position that nature has an underlying structure independent of human observation  Werner Heisenberg pointed out that the very nature of observing a phenomenon changes the very nature of the phenomenon...

Step 2 of 3

Chapter 7.3, Problem 8E is Solved
Step 3 of 3

Textbook: Statistics for Engineers and Scientists
Edition: 4th
Author: William Navidi
ISBN: 9780073401331

×
Log in to StudySoup
Get Full Access to Statistics For Engineers And Scientists - 4th Edition - Chapter 7.3 - Problem 8e

Forgot password? Reset password here

Join StudySoup for FREE
Get Full Access to Statistics For Engineers And Scientists - 4th Edition - Chapter 7.3 - Problem 8e
Join with Email
Already have an account? Login here
Reset your password

I don't want to reset my password

Need help? Contact support

Need an Account? Is not associated with an account
Sign up
We're here to help

Having trouble accessing your account? Let us help you, contact support at +1(510) 944-1054 or support@studysoup.com

Got it, thanks!
Password Reset Request Sent An email has been sent to the email address associated to your account. Follow the link in the email to reset your password. If you're having trouble finding our email please check your spam folder
Got it, thanks!
Already have an Account? Is already in use
Log in
Incorrect Password The password used to log in with this account is incorrect
Try Again

Forgot password? Reset it here