In a study of the causes of bearing wear, a machine was
Chapter 8, Problem 11E(choose chapter or problem)
In a study of the causes of bearing wear, a machine was run 24 times, with various loads (denoted \(x_1\)), oil viscosities \((x_2)\), and ambient temperatures \((x_3)\). The wear, denoted y, was modeled as \(y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\beta_{3} x_{3}+\beta_{4} x_{1} x_{2}+\beta_{5} x_{1} x_{3}+\beta_{6} x_{2} x_{3}+\varepsilon\). When this model was fit to the data, the sum of squares for error was SSE = 9.37. Then the reduced model \(y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\beta_{3} x_{3}\) was fit, and the sum of squares for error was SSE = 27.49. Is it reasonable to use the reduced model, rather than the model containing all the interactions, to predict wear? Explain.
Equation Transcription:
Text Transcription:
x_1
(x_2)
(x_3)
y=beta_0+beta_1x_1+beta_2x_2+beta_3x_3+beta_4x_1x_2+beta_5x_1x_3+beta_6x_2x_3+varepsilon
SSE=9.37
y=beta_0+beta_1x_1+beta_2x_2+beta_3x_3
SSE=27.49
Unfortunately, we don't have that question answered yet. But you can get it answered in just 5 hours by Logging in or Becoming a subscriber.
Becoming a subscriber
Or look for another answer