How would you respond to the following argument? This talk
Chapter , Problem 9(choose chapter or problem)
How would you respond to the following argument? This talk of sampling distributions is ridiculous! Consider Example A of Section 8.4. The experimenter found the mean number of fibers to be 24.9. How can this be a “random variable” with an associated “probability distribution” when it's just a number? The author of this book is guilty of deliberate mystification!
Unfortunately, we don't have that question answered yet. But you can get it answered in just 5 hours by Logging in or Becoming a subscriber.
Becoming a subscriber
Or look for another answer