Urban population estimation using satellite images. Can

Chapter 12, Problem 149SE

(choose chapter or problem)

Get Unlimited Answers
QUESTION:

Urban population estimation using satellite images. Can the population of an urban area be estimated without taking a census? In Geographical Analysis (January, 2007) geography professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Ohio State University demonstrated the use of satellite image maps for estimating urban population. A portion of Columbus, Ohio, was partitioned into n = 125 census block groups, and satellite imagery was obtained. For each census block, the following variables were measured: population density (y), proportion of block with low-density residential areas \(\left(x_1\right)\), and proportion of block with high-density residential areas \(\left(x_2\right)\). A first-order model for y was fit to the data with the following results:

                                                  \(\hat{y}=-.0304+2.006 x_1+5.006 x_2, R^2=.686\)

a. Give a practical interpretation of each \(\beta\) estimate in the model.

b. Give a practical interpretation of the coefficient of determination, \(R^2\).

c. State \(H_0\) and \(H_{\mathrm{a}}\) for a test of overall model adequacy.

d. Refer to part c. Compute the value of the test statistic.

e. Refer to parts c and d. Make the appropriate conclusion at \(\alpha=.01\).

Questions & Answers

QUESTION:

Urban population estimation using satellite images. Can the population of an urban area be estimated without taking a census? In Geographical Analysis (January, 2007) geography professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Ohio State University demonstrated the use of satellite image maps for estimating urban population. A portion of Columbus, Ohio, was partitioned into n = 125 census block groups, and satellite imagery was obtained. For each census block, the following variables were measured: population density (y), proportion of block with low-density residential areas \(\left(x_1\right)\), and proportion of block with high-density residential areas \(\left(x_2\right)\). A first-order model for y was fit to the data with the following results:

                                                  \(\hat{y}=-.0304+2.006 x_1+5.006 x_2, R^2=.686\)

a. Give a practical interpretation of each \(\beta\) estimate in the model.

b. Give a practical interpretation of the coefficient of determination, \(R^2\).

c. State \(H_0\) and \(H_{\mathrm{a}}\) for a test of overall model adequacy.

d. Refer to part c. Compute the value of the test statistic.

e. Refer to parts c and d. Make the appropriate conclusion at \(\alpha=.01\).

ANSWER:

Step 1 of 7

(a)

Interpretation:

The estimated value of  is –0.0304. Here, the independent variables cannot be implemented whether the proportion of block with low-density residential areas and proportion of block with high-density residential areas are increases or decreases. Thus, the estimated value remains the constant (–0.0304) in the model.

The estimated value of  is 2.006. Here, if the population density is increased for every one unit increase in the proportion of block with low-density residential areas, the proportion of block with high-density residential areas remains constant.

In the given model,  is 5.006, if the population density is increased for every one unit increase in the proportion of block with high-density residential areas, but the proportion of block with low-density residential areas remains constant.

Add to cart


Study Tools You Might Need

Not The Solution You Need? Search for Your Answer Here:

×

Login

Login or Sign up for access to all of our study tools and educational content!

Forgot password?
Register Now

×

Register

Sign up for access to all content on our site!

Or login if you already have an account

×

Reset password

If you have an active account we’ll send you an e-mail for password recovery

Or login if you have your password back