Figure 44-14 shows part of the experimental arrangement in | StudySoup

Textbook Solutions for Fundamentals of Physics

Chapter 44 Problem 49

Question

Figure 44-14 shows part of the experimental arrangement in which antiprotons were discovered in the 1950s. A beam of 6.2 GeV protons emerged from a particle accelerator and collided with nuclei in a copper target. According to theoretical predictions at the time, collisions between protons in the beam and the protons and neutrons in those nuclei should produce antiprotons via the reactions and However, even if these reactions did occur, they would be rare compared to the reactions p ' p : p ' p ' -' ' -# andThus, most of the particles produced by the collisions between the6.2 GeV protons and the copper target were pions.To prove that antiprotons exist and were produced by somelimited number of the collisions, particles leaving the target weresent into a series of magnetic fields and detectors as shown inFig. 44-14. The first magnetic field (M1) curved the path of anycharged particle passing through it; moreover, the field was arranged so that the only particles that emerged from it to reach the second magnetic field (Q1) had to be negatively charged (either a p or a p#) and have a momentum of 1.19 GeV/c. Field Q1 was a special type of magnetic field (a quadrapole field) that focused the particles reaching it into a beam, allowing them to pass through a hole in thick shielding to a scintillation counter S1. The passage of a charged particle through the counter triggered a signal, with each signal indicating the passage of either a 1.19 GeV/c p# or (presumably) a 1.19 GeV/c p . After being refocused by magnetic field Q2, the particles were directed by magnetic field M2 through a second scintillation counter S2 and then through two Cerenkov counters C1 and C2. These latter detectors can be manufactured so that they send a signal only when the particle passing through them is moving with a speed that falls within a certain range. In the experiment, a particle with a speed greater than 0.79c would trigger C1 and a particle with a speed between 0.75c and 0.78c would trigger C2. There were then two ways to distinguish the predicted rare antiprotons from the abundant negative pions. Both ways involved the fact that the speed of a 1.19 GeV/c p differs from that of a 1.19 GeV/c p#: (1) According to calculations, a p would trigger one of the Cerenkov counters and a p# would trigger the other. (2) The time interval )t between signals from S1 and S2, which were separated by 12 m, would have one value for a p and another value for a p#. Thus, if the correct Cerenkov counter were triggered and the time interval )t had the correct value, the experiment would prove the existence of antiprotons. What is the speed of (a) an antiproton with a momentum of 1.19 GeV/c and (b) a negative pion with that same momentum? (The speed of an antiproton through the Cerenkov detectors would actually be slightly less than calculated here because the antiproton would lose a little energy within the detectors.) Which Cerenkov detector was triggered by (c) an antiproton and (d) a negative pion? What time interval )t indicated the passage of (e) an antiproton and (f) a negative pion? [ from O. Chamberlain, E. Segr, C.Wiegand, and T.Ypsilantis,Observation of Antiprotons,Physical Review, Vol. 100, pp. 947950 (1955).]

Solution

Step 1 of 4)

The first step in solving 44 problem number 49 trying to solve the problem we have to refer to the textbook question: Figure 44-14 shows part of the experimental arrangement in which antiprotons were discovered in the 1950s. A beam of 6.2 GeV protons emerged from a particle accelerator and collided with nuclei in a copper target. According to theoretical predictions at the time, collisions between protons in the beam and the protons and neutrons in those nuclei should produce antiprotons via the reactions and However, even if these reactions did occur, they would be rare compared to the reactions p ' p : p ' p ' -' ' -# andThus, most of the particles produced by the collisions between the6.2 GeV protons and the copper target were pions.To prove that antiprotons exist and were produced by somelimited number of the collisions, particles leaving the target weresent into a series of magnetic fields and detectors as shown inFig. 44-14. The first magnetic field (M1) curved the path of anycharged particle passing through it; moreover, the field was arranged so that the only particles that emerged from it to reach the second magnetic field (Q1) had to be negatively charged (either a p or a p#) and have a momentum of 1.19 GeV/c. Field Q1 was a special type of magnetic field (a quadrapole field) that focused the particles reaching it into a beam, allowing them to pass through a hole in thick shielding to a scintillation counter S1. The passage of a charged particle through the counter triggered a signal, with each signal indicating the passage of either a 1.19 GeV/c p# or (presumably) a 1.19 GeV/c p . After being refocused by magnetic field Q2, the particles were directed by magnetic field M2 through a second scintillation counter S2 and then through two Cerenkov counters C1 and C2. These latter detectors can be manufactured so that they send a signal only when the particle passing through them is moving with a speed that falls within a certain range. In the experiment, a particle with a speed greater than 0.79c would trigger C1 and a particle with a speed between 0.75c and 0.78c would trigger C2. There were then two ways to distinguish the predicted rare antiprotons from the abundant negative pions. Both ways involved the fact that the speed of a 1.19 GeV/c p differs from that of a 1.19 GeV/c p#: (1) According to calculations, a p would trigger one of the Cerenkov counters and a p# would trigger the other. (2) The time interval )t between signals from S1 and S2, which were separated by 12 m, would have one value for a p and another value for a p#. Thus, if the correct Cerenkov counter were triggered and the time interval )t had the correct value, the experiment would prove the existence of antiprotons. What is the speed of (a) an antiproton with a momentum of 1.19 GeV/c and (b) a negative pion with that same momentum? (The speed of an antiproton through the Cerenkov detectors would actually be slightly less than calculated here because the antiproton would lose a little energy within the detectors.) Which Cerenkov detector was triggered by (c) an antiproton and (d) a negative pion? What time interval )t indicated the passage of (e) an antiproton and (f) a negative pion? [ from O. Chamberlain, E. Segr, C.Wiegand, and T.Ypsilantis,Observation of Antiprotons,Physical Review, Vol. 100, pp. 947950 (1955).]
From the textbook chapter you will find a few key concepts needed to solve this.

Step 2 of 7)

Visible to paid subscribers only

Step 3 of 7)

Visible to paid subscribers only

Subscribe to view the
full solution

Title Fundamentals of Physics 10 
Author David Halliday; Robert Resnick; Jearl Walker
ISBN 9781118230725

Figure 44-14 shows part of the experimental arrangement in

Chapter 44 textbook questions

×

Login

Organize all study tools for free

Or continue with
×

Register

Sign up for access to all content on our site!

Or continue with

Or login if you already have an account

×

Reset password

If you have an active account we’ll send you an e-mail for password recovery

Or login if you have your password back